Please I need an expert with a business HR background to address the following comments to make this article accepted for HR journal Scopus Q2-3. Also, the article can be reduced a few more pages. ( please do anything you think is needed from the title to the conclusion) Cut delete anything I would like to briefly note that in order to be accepted for publication in HRM, a manuscript must be judged (1) to make a significant theoretical contribution to the HR literature, or (2) to provide new practical insight and guidance that is likely to be highly valued by our readers… In our view, the submitted manuscript does not meet these criteria.” a clear statement on the contributions of the paper and the significance of the study is missing. “It needs to add innovative issues in managing diversity at the workplace in small businesses to develop future research areas that are more attractive to the readers” “the significance of the study is missing due to the lack of theorization” “it lacks the depth of analysis and innovative ideas that links the theory with the argued facts concerning the Saudi small business work environment” It is imperative for the authors to address such concerns about the manuscript through revisions as a novelty, significance statement, establishing a well-supported central outcome of the study are critical to improving the quality of the manuscript and its chances of a successful publication.