Should focus on recommendations, B. be clear on alternatives considered, and C. Must discuss and support the analysis and/or the recommendations based on theory relevant to the case that we have discussed and/or read (integration of textbook chapters previously discussed and assigned for that day & outside sources)Question: 1. What conflicts must foreign oil companies resolve in deciding whether or not to invest in Ecuador?2. What objectives and whose interests appear to be carrying the most weight in this case? Which should dominate?3. Is there a strategy that makes sense for a firm to continue to pursue upstream oil business in Ecuador? What would you – as an “external consultant” – recommend the protagonist of the case to do?