on the article “The English-Only Movement:Myths, Reality and Implications on Psychology”

Each entry of the bibliography should include around a paragraph on the following: (1) Summary: The topic(s) included in the source, relevant details about these topics, and the authors arguments about them. This portion is technically a summary because it explicitly discusses author and text. However, it should basically follow the guidelines of paraphrasing. (2) Critical Evaluation: The overall usefulness, dependability, and scholarship of the resource, in your own estimation and relative to other materials in your bibliography. This portion explains whether the source should be treated as reliable, generally objective research vs. highly subjective, biased opinion. Both can be useful, but evaluating them requires a critical approach. (3) Practical Discussion: How do you see this resource working in your research? Does it provide specific examples or quotes? Or is it more useful for a general narrative? How does the authors argument contribute to the argument you will make in your own writing?