Why does he think the ‘Supernaturalist’ position is better?

– 1500 words, Word limit may only be 10% over or under the specified number to fall within the requirements of the task. – Students must not use non-academic sources. An academic source is a peer-reviewed piece of writing, written by an expert in the field, and made available by a recognized publishing house. This excludes blog posts, social media posts, online dictionaries, online (non-academic) encyclopaedias and general websites (even university and government websites).  – 12 point, Times New Roman.  – 1.5 or 2.0 spaced on A4 paper. – In-text citations are present and sources of information or data are acknowledged.  – Components of in-text citations are correct.  – Where quotes are used, they are identified as quotes. Topic i have picked:  Topic 3 – Philosophy and religion In his work, Miracles, C.S. Lewis argues for the rationality of belief in some miracles. After reading this work, write an essay consisting of two main parts. The first part (between 500 and 750 words) should be devoted to answering these questions: what is the difference between Lewis’ ‘Supernaturalist’ view and the ‘Naturalist’ view? Why does he think the ‘Supernaturalist’ position is better? And how does he use the distinction between these two views to defend the possibility and probability of some miracles? The second part of the essay (between 750 to 1000 words) should be devoted to either defending or arguing against Lewis’ position. In order to be considered acceptable, your essay must incorporate at least two (ideally three to four) other academic sources in addition to the Miracles. Non-academic blogs and websites must not be used and your paper must not be constructed from other persons’ summaries of Lewis’ book. Lewis’ work can be found here: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.260876/page/n1