Analyze the excerpt from the Bhagavad Gita in our text, and break down, into separate points, Krishna’s definition of wisdom.

Write an essay on the topic listed below. The essay should be in 12 point font, double spaced, typed, and conform to MLA formatting requirements. Remember to develop and support your argument using specific examples and quotes from the texts.

Do not use research. Use only your own analysis of the specific elements of text.

Analyze the portrayal of women in Oedipus the King, Antigone, Medea, and Lysistrata and write a paper that explains, based on the four plays only, how women are perceived.

Analyze the excerpt from the Bhagavad Gita in our text, and break down, into separate points, Krishna’s definition of wisdom.

Pick the work that you have found most compelling over the course of the semester and write an essay explaining why. Make sure to refer to specific elements in the text.

Compare the excerpt from the Bhagavad Gita in our text to the aspects of Daoism (Using the excerpts in out text) and/or Buddhism (as presented on the following website: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Buddhism (Links to an external site.)

Describe what you learned from some of the feedback your writing specialist provided as explanations.

Purpose: The primary goal of this weekly assignment is to enable you to understand the revision process and revise your paper with the help of a writing specialist.

Prepare:

Step 1: Prepare a shortened version of your Final Paper (at least four pages) by including the following:

Introduction paragraph and thesis statement you developed for your Week 3 Assignment.
Background information of the global societal issue you have chosen.
Brief argument supporting at least two solutions to the global societal issue.
Conclusion paragraph.
Must document any information used from at least five scholarly sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) Note that you will need at least eight scholarly sources for your Final Paper in Week 5.
Step 2: After you have completed a rough draft of your paper, submit that draft to the Ashford Writing Center by using the instructions found in the Paper Review (Links to an external site.) page. Your paper will be returned within 24 hours, so give yourself enough time to complete and submit it prior to the due date.

Reflect: Carefully review the revision letter and the margin comments that you see on your returned paper. Consider each of the suggestions provided to help you to revise your paper.

Write:

What You Need to Submit to Waypoint:

Upload the PDF document that contains the feedback from the Writing Center specialist.
Submit the journal assignment answering the following questions in at least 400 words:
Identify the top three issues your writing specialist focused on in your rough draft (e.g., paragraph structure, proper use of quotations, thesis statement, etc.).
In what ways were those issues surprising?
Describe what you learned from some of the feedback your writing specialist provided as explanations.
Was this feedback helpful?
Evaluate the usefulness of the paper review tool.
In what ways did this activity improve your academic writing skills?
Will you use the Ashford Writing Center to review your work in the future? Why or why not?
Identify Writing Center Video Tutorials (Links to an external site.) that you find most useful and explain why. Also, identify tutorial(s) you found least useful and explain why.

Explain the advantage and disadvantages to switching to a JIT system, and why this would or would not be the best system for this company and its products at this time.

You are a partner at a major consulting firm that has won a competitive bid to provide Logistics consulting services to a large, world-class maker of cellular phones, tablets, and laptops. This client is the market leader in the design, manufacture, and marketing, of their tablet products. However, technological advancements and competitive pressure in the tablet market have combined to compel the client to continue to innovate, and to do so quickly, to ensure that they are not left behind. A major concern is that the client has stockpiled an enormous quantity of tablets that are no longer in demand.

Sales are now lower than expected, and client senior management has decided to to switch their product to state-of-the-art hardware and digital technology and equally importantly, to move to a JIT manufacturing model until the client is certain that the new tablet will be competitive and can enter the worldwide market. In your Logistics consulting role for the company, you are required to:

1) Recommend a way to reduce inventory. Our class readings share several ways that inventory can be reduced. Choose the best one and explain why this would be cost effective and beneficial for the company.

2) Explain the advantage and disadvantages to switching to a JIT system, and why this would or would not be the best system for this company and its products at this time. What are other considerations that might adversely influence the decision to transition to a JIT system?

3) Given that the JIT system is chosen, in what way will the supplier relationships change or improve? How should the company now work with their suppliers?

4) [Safety stock is held as a buffer to protect against shortages that may arise owing to uncertainties in demand, lead time, and supply. Improving forecast accuracy to reduce uncertainties in demand, reducing replenishment lead time, and working with more reliable suppliers are some of the approaches to reduce safety stock levels.] What risks would the company run up against if no safety stocks are present and how can they compensate for these risks if they choose the JIT system?

5) Distinguish between recycling, re-manufacturing and refurbishing. Give an example of how this company may use each, and which (any, all, or none) of these would be effective with the tablet product.

Describe the conditions that led to the enactment of each of the following laws or government policies.

Describe the conditions that led to the enactment of each of the following laws or government policies.
Explain the provisions of each of these laws.
Identify the person(s) associated with each enactment.
In your opinion, were these acts justifiable?Explain.
1.The Alien and Sedition Act (1798)
2.The Sedition Act (1918)
3.The “Red Scare” and (Mitchell) Palmer Raide (1921)
4.The Smith Act (1940)
5.The Interment Of Japanese Americans during WWWII
6.The McCarran Act (1950)
7.The Joseph McCarthy Congressional Hearing (1950’s)
8. The Patriot Act (2001)

Describe the diagram you have created, what metrics are used to evaluate the workflow, what are the areas for improvement, and conclusion. Include a copy of the workflow diagram in the paper.

Workflow analysis is not an optional part of clinical implementations, but rather a necessity for safe patient care supported by technology. The ultimate goal of workflow analysis is not to “pave the cow path,” but rather to create a future-state solution that maximizes the use of technology and eliminates non–value-added activities.
1) Review the workflow diagram of the assigned topic above
2)Diagram the workflow for the procedure
3)Have you included all of the steps?
4)Assess each of the steps in the diagram and determine if they are value-added steps or non-value added steps. Is the non-value added steps necessary—i.e. required by accreditors or by law?
Write a paper describing the workflow process you have chosen. Describe the diagram you have created, what metrics are used to evaluate the workflow, what are the areas for improvement, and conclusion. Include a copy of the workflow diagram in the paper.

Kant and many other philosophers hold that one has duties to oneself, including a duty to refrain from harmful activities. Can there be duties that one owes to oneself? If not, why not? If so, is refraining from smoking (tobacco) one of them?

1. Do we have an obligation to incur risk for others in need of assistance? Why or why not?
2. Is safety superior to freedom? Are you willing to exchange freedom and civil liberties in favor of greater “safety”?
3. When should public officials refrain from paternalistic interference according to Goodin?
4. Kant and many other philosophers hold that one has duties to oneself, including a duty to refrain from harmful activities. Can there be duties that one owes to oneself? If not, why not? If so, is refraining from smoking (tobacco) one of them?

Using one of Egan’s planning frameworks, Describe an evaluation that can measure the extent to which the content has been learned.

P: Using one of Egan’s planning frameworks,
write a lesson in a subject matter you plan to teach for students in the age group you would most
like to work with. Say what makes you choose that framework for your lesson

1. Identifying importance: State what is affectively engaging about the topic. Say why it is important.

2. Finding binary opposites: Describe some set(s) of binary opposites that best capture the affective importance of the topic. Say what makes them an effective choice.

3. Organizing the content into a story form: Say what content most dramatically embodies the binary concepts. Describe an image that best captures that content and its dramatic contrast. Say why the image is a good choice. Say why the image is useful in articulating the content in story form.

4. Conclusion: Say what is the best way of resolving the conflict inherent in the binary concepts. Say why that’s a good way to resolve the opposition expressed in the content.

5. Evaluation: Describe an evaluation that can measure the extent to which the content has been learned. Say how that evaluation will do its job.

Criticize the paper or methodology. Decide if you agree or disagree with the general content of the paper. Explain why or why not and what you might do differently.

Section 1 (20pts): Given the article or methodology uploaded to CANVAS, give an abstract or summary of the article or methodology in your own words.

Section 2: Explain 3 methodologies, or explain 3 protocols, or explain 2 points covered in the paper given for that week’s lab report reference.

Section 3 (20pts): Using the 3 techniques, or methods, or protocols mentioned in section 2, explain the importance of each technique or the purpose they serve in science, why are they important? How would you personally assume or utilize each technique?

Section 4 : Criticize the paper or methodology. Decide if you agree or disagree with the general content of the paper. Explain why or why not and what you might do differently.