Author: custom-essay

Your grade will depend upon the presentation of your analysis and research, the quality of the work presented – whether you give a detailed presentation or a vague overview, whether you addressed all parts of the question asked, and how you support your argument/discussion – as well as the citing of a variety of sources/use of references and whether you met the mandatory minimum page requirement.

Choice 1: Discuss the goals of a victim-witness program. In what ways are they complex or conflicting? In what ways do some goals serve as constraints? Now consider those goals in the context of where in the organization the program is located. Will they differ if the program is attached to the prosecutor’s office or if it is an independent unit? How would you design a victim-witness program?

Textbook: Criminal Justice Organizations-Administration & Management, 6th edition
Authors: Stojkovic, Kalinich and Klofas
Publisher: Thompson/Wadsworth
ISBN: 978-1-285-45901-1

Identifies/states what literature search/what others are saying about different areas of your subject.

Topic/Area of literature research 1
Reference/Finding #1
Reference/Finding #2
Reference/Finding #3
Interview (optional):
Who, what, when, and where and results (if applicable, if not interviewing anyone, skip this step).
Theory:
Explain and connect to the issue you have researched
What you think the connections are among the actual issue, the lit search, the theory, and the interview.

Compare and contrast the relationship of the individual with the larger society as reflected by Achilles and Beowulf.

Chapter 5: Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities…
Describe the response to the intervention model for identifying learning disabilities, and include concerns about the model.

chapter 6: Understanding Students with Communication Disorders…
Explain the importance of collaboration when providing services for students with communication disorders in the context of facilitative language strategies.

Required Resources:
• Shogren, K., Turnbull, A., Trunbull, R., &Wehmeyer, M. (2016). Exceptional Live: Special Education in Today’s Schools. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Critique the way in which Texas politics interacts with US governmental politics.

Texas politicians and the Texas political system are very unique. We operate in a way unlike any other state. Review and critique the way in which Texas operates based on its role in federalism. Do we cooperate, do we assist, or do we only provide difficulties? Utilize recent/current event examples to showcase how Texas has interacted with federal government in the past few years. Discuss how that has gone – has it been successful, did Texas shine in a positive light, did we appear to be the “cowboys” that everyone thinks us to be?
While including research and examples, you can reflect on your personal perception of Texas in national politics and how influential we may or may not be. Also, determine if you feel, or the research suggests, that we as Texas may set the mood for the nation on certain topics. Are we that influential? Or do we just believe we are?

1.Define analogous and homologous traits and provide an example for each.

2.Explain the differences and similarities between microevolution and macroevolution ,giving an example for each one.

3.Which primate traits are likely to be adaptions to arboreal lifestyles?

4.List five traits that distinguish Lemurs and Lorises from the anthropoids

To answer these questions you must use the text book :Introduction to physical anthropology (2013-2014 edition) by Robert Jurmain and outside source.

Reviewing Appendix B in Butts, choose two of the Nine Tenets of the Code of Ethics for Nurses and describe how you will personally apply each tenet in the practice setting with your patients. Describe in detail the purpose of the tenet and provide examples of the tenet applied in practice. Explain why it is important to uphold the tenet in maximizing the quality of patient care, and identify how it enhances your own practice as a nurse.

In Week 3, you created an annotated bibliography on a set of topics. For this assignment, use that information to write a thorough literature review. Develop a paper from the information you collected as well as what you learned from your course and text readings. To supplement your literature review for this paper, find two more scholarly journal articles related to any of the topics here (added to the six articles you reviewed in Week 3, for a total of at least eight articles; see article criteria from W3 Assignment 2):

Criteria: Clearly identify and describe your chosen disorder. Include the following:
The typical age of onset of the disorder
Symptoms or criteria for diagnosis
The typical course or progression of the disorder, causes, and multicultural and diversity factors (including gender)
Associated problems or disorders that tend to co-occur
History: Describe the history of the disorder. (Explain how our understanding of the causes and treatment of the disorder has changed over time.)
Theories: Compare at least two psychological theories that seek to explain the causes and symptoms of the disorder.
Treatments: Identify and describe three of the most effective (on the basis of your research findings) treatments for the disorder. Provide information from your sources to back up your statements.
Write a paper in Microsoft Word document, adhering to the following guidelines:

The length of the paper should be 12–14 double-spaced pages (including the title and reference pages).
The paper should have the following sections:
A title page
Introduction: This should be 1–2 pages in length. The introduction provides a brief overview of what will be covered and the purpose of the paper.
Literature review: The literature review should be based on the information you gathered and analyzed in Week 3, in addition to at least two additional articles. In total, you should be including at least eight academic journal articles in this paper.
Discussion and conclusion sections: The difference between a great paper and a marginal one is the depth and originality of the discussion and conclusion sections. This is where you bring together what you learned from the literature review (as well as through the course) in your concluding remarks regarding your topic.