Discuss the findings and recommendations and if the aircraft incident could have been prevented.

For this Internet research assignment, research an aircraft incident related to the fuel system. The incident could be while in flight or on the ground. Explain the design of the fuel system, what caused the incident, whether or not the design of the fuel system contributed to the incident and/or any other problems associated with the fuel system (e.g. fuel imbalance). Discuss the findings and recommendations and if the aircraft incident could have been prevented. This is a general assignment but intended to get you familiar with the resources available pertaining to aviation maintenance as well as to broaden your knowledge of aircraft fuel systems. Below are some recommended resources to get you started: • General Aviation News (Links to an external site.) • Aviation Week (Links to an external site.) • AVM Magazine (Links to an external site.) • DOM Magazine (Links to an external site.) • Hunt Library (Links to an external site.)

Discuss how managers will play a role in the effectiveness of training and how leadership is necessary to help get employee buy-in for the training.

The industrial plant where you work is expanding its operations and building a facility that will employ 200 new workers. Management has tasked you with creating a training program for the new workers. They want you to investigate a specific hazard or safety topic and create a PowerPoint presentation explaining the hazard/topic and how you will handle training the employees. Choose one of the following hazards/topics and prepare a PowerPoint presentation for management: hearing protection; the use of half-mask air purifying respirators (APRs); lock-out/tag-out of a hydraulic press; or HazCom for a location that just uses acetone, toluene, and isopropyl alcohol. As part of this scenario, you are free to include additional details about the hazard/topic you choose. For instance, if you choose hearing protection, you can include information about the manufacturing equipment and the decibel levels in the area. Include the following components in your PowerPoint presentation. Evaluate the hazard, and discuss any regulations pertaining to the hazard/environment. Explain any additional hazard abatement strategies and safety and health management strategies that were taken to mitigate the effects of the hazard (e.g., substitution, engineering controls). Prepare a brief description of steps you will take to involve the students in the training. Discuss if you will use any hands-on training and how you will perform the hands-on training if you use it. Create two slides that you will use in your actual training program with employees. Explain these to management to convince them that the training is beneficial. Discuss how managers will play a role in the effectiveness of training and how leadership is necessary to help get employee buy-in for the training. Discuss how you will evaluate the effectiveness of the training. Use the speaker notes section to explain the material that you present on each of the slides.

Discuss the types of people who attended concerts in the Baroque era and modern times, and why people attended concerts in the Baroque era versus today.

Choose two excerpts of a concert, one of a pop or rock concert from modern times and one of a performance of Baroque music. (The Baroque performance would by necessity be a performance of Baroque music performed in modern times.) Each excerpt should be approximately 10 minutes in length. After viewing the concert excerpts, construct a comparison of these two concerts and address the following: 1. Explain why you did or did not enjoy the concerts. 2. Evaluate similarities and differences between music in the Baroque era and modern times. 3. Discuss the types of people who attended concerts in the Baroque era and modern times, and why people attended concerts in the Baroque era versus today. 4. Analyze how new technologies, such as digital media and the internet, change the ways music is experienced.

Assess the ideal of branding and rebranding through “positioning” and “frame of reference.”

After reviewing this module’s resources, compare and contrast Rory Sutherland’s concept of “frame of reference” marketing to that of expensive and magnificent solutions. Assess the ideal of branding and rebranding through “positioning” and “frame of reference.”

Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size? In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected. To Prepare: Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment. Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available. Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research. The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project) Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. By Day 7 of Week 5 Submit Part 3 of your Evidence-Based Project. Excellent Good Fair Poor Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. 81 (81%) – 90 (90%) The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest.

How did the documentary relate to material covered in the class? Explain how the ideas from the documentary connect to ideas and theories that we’ve discussed so far.

Description View Against All Odds: The Fight for a Black Middle Class, and then craft a critical essay using the questions below to guide your writing. 1) Using a maximum of two sentences, state the main idea or the thesis driving this documentary. 2) Briefly summarize the documentary. What evidence is used to support the theories/arguments put forth? In other words, discuss the arguments put forth using the language and main concepts from the documentary. Explain with specific examples. 3) How did the documentary relate to material covered in the class? Explain how the ideas from the documentary connect to ideas and theories that we’ve discussed so far. Be sure you make specific references to authors, concepts, and theories from our readings, citing the chapters you discuss. You must incorporate at least 5 of the assigned chapters from the unit. 4) Did you enjoy the documentary? Hate it? Explain. Here is your chance to vent (or let me know that this is the best thing you’ve ever watched)! Tell me why you think this is a masterpiece or disaster. Did the filmmaker make points that you agree with? Disagree with? 5) Write three discussion questions about this documentary. What would you like to ask the filmmaker? Do you have any questions for any of the people in the documentary? Remember to answer each question fully, providing details and rich explanations of your views.Inequality in the 21st century: a reader. Boulder, Co: Westview Press. Please use the link below for the video. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/chasing-the-dream/films/against-all-odds/

Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice.

Assignment: The Impact of Standardized Nursing Terminology Among the Resources in this module is the Rutherford (2008) article Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice? In this article, the author recounts a visit to a local hospital to view the recent implementation of a new coding system. During the visit, one of the nurses commented to her, “We document our care using standardized nursing languages but we don’t fully understand why we do” (Rutherford, 2008, para. 1). How would you respond to a comment such as this one? To Prepare: Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources, particularly Rutherford, M. (2008) Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice? Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker. Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed. Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies. Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library. By Day 7 of Week 5 Excellent Good Fair Poor In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following: · Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies. · Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples. · Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library. 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as others, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies. The responses accurately and thoroughly describe in detail the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice, with sufficient supporting evidence and detailed examples. Responses are fully supported as evidenced by 3 or more accurate, peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing terminologies. 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) The responses accurately explain how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as other, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies. The responses accurately describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice, with some supporting evidence and examples. Response are supported as evidenced by 2 or more accurate, peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing terminologies. 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) The responses explaining how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as others, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies are vague or inaccurate. The responses describing the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice are vague or inaccurate. Responses may include some support as evidenced by 1-2 peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing terminologies. 0 (0%) – 59 (59%) The responses explaining how to inform the nurse in the scenario, as well as others, on the importance of standardized nursing terminologies are vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The responses describing the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice are vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Responses include no peer-reviewed research sources on standardized nursing terminologies. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization.

Based on your findings in the literature, what did you discover that will help you address your practice problem?

Practice Problem Evidence based practice is essential to effective social work practice. For this assignment, you are required to (a) identify a current practice problem relevant in your current agency (i.e., working with resistant clients, engaging clients when they don’t talk much, having negative perceptions about your client, counter transference, etc.), (b) after identifying your practice problem, conduct an extensive literature search as it relates to your practice problem that provides you with a complete understanding of the practice problem. Based on your findings in the literature, what did you discover that will help you address your practice problem? How might your research guide your work in your field agency? After reviewing the literature/research and comparing it to the practice problem, the student is expected to do the following: By Day 7 Submit a reflection paper that: Briefly discusses the literature Briefly identifies the practice problem Briefly explains how the literature will be used to address the practice problem while engaging in the agency.

Discuss the limitations the article identified with the sample and how those limitations affect the reliability or credibility.

Research Design and Sampling Using the empirical research article that your instructor approved in the Week 5 assignment, ask yourself: “Is this a quantitative research article or a qualitative research article?” Remember, in quantitative research, the emphasis is on measuring social phenomenon because it is assumed that everything can be observed, measured, and quantified. On the other hand, in qualitative research, it is assumed that social phenomenon cannot be easily reduced and broken down into concepts that can be measured and quantified. Instead, there may be different meanings to phenomenon and experiences. Often in qualitative research, researchers use interviews, focus groups and observations to gather data and then report their findings using words and quotations. Consider how these different methods affect the sampling design and recruitment strategy, and ask yourself how the recruitment of research participants will affect the findings. For this Assignment, submit a 3-4 page paper. Complete the following: Read your selected empirical research article, and identify whether the study is a quantitative or qualitative study. Justify the reasons why you believe it is a quantitative or qualitative study. (Your instructor will indicate to you if you are correct in identifying the research design. This will point you to whether you will use the “Quantitative Article and Review Critique” or the “Qualitative Article and Review Critique” guidelines for the final assignment in week 10.) Using the empirical research article, focus on the sampling method in the study and begin to evaluate the sampling method by answering the following: Describe the sampling methods in your own words (paraphrase, do not quote from the article). Describe the generalizability or the transferability of the research finding based on the sampling method. Discuss the limitations the article identified with the sample and how those limitations affect the reliability or credibility. Explain one recommendation you would make to improve the sampling plan of the study that would address these limitations in future research.