Author: custom-essay

Mr. Nguyen is a 58-year-old patient that had septic shock and developed Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. He is orally intubated and on a mechanical ventilator. He is paralyzed and sedated. What manifestations might you observe for a patient with ARDS? What complications can Mr. Nguyen develop from being mechanically ventilated? List priority nursing interventions to prevent complications associated with ventilatory support. What interventions can be implemented specifically to prevent the development of Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia (VAP)? You are orienting in the ICU, the nurse you are working with is not implementing the VAP interventions. What would you do?

Instructions For this scholarly activity, develop a supporting human resource (HR) plan for an organizational strategy by completing the following tasks: Research a company that has undergone (or attempted to undergo) a shift in organization or culture within the past five years. This shift must have been a result of innovation. Some examples of companies that have gone through this change are Apple, General Motors, Marvel, Delta Airlines, Starbucks, Old Spice, J. Crew, CBS, Pabst Blue Ribbon, Nintendo, Converse, Lego, and Lacoste. Describe the organization or culture before and after the shift. Has the shift been successful (e.g., made the company more profitable or influenced the employees to be more productive employees), or did the shift fail? Layout the human resource plan you would suggest for the company you have chosen. Explain your choices. Your analysis of a company and proposed HR plan should consist of a minimum of three pages (maximum of four) of text. You are required to use at least one outside source to support your explanation and plan. Your scholarly submission should be formatted in accordance with APA style.

Imagine you are an advisory board member for a Fortune 500 organization, representing the Information Technology Division. Your organization is looking forward to expanding its mobile software development platform and optimizing software project management practices. Specific organizational goals include minimizing software development costs and improving the reliability of mobile applications. As a member, you are asked to qualify methodologies and recommend best practices for optimizing software development. Research frameworks that may be used for meeting the organization’s goals and consider best practices for software project management strategies for this project. Write 5 pages paper in which: 1. Describe how the development-process framework provides opportunities for streamlining software development, increasing quality, and minimizing risk. Explain the distinct focus areas that exist within system engineering and software development. Note: Refer to Figure 2.1B, see attached. 2. Compare and contrast at least two (2) traditional software development process models with respect to iterative-development process models. Provide details on the various benefits and challenges that each method offers for an aggressive mobile development strategy. 3. Determine at least three (3) risks that may occur if the requirements engineering process is not properly followed. Speculate on how failing to perform these processes may lead to project failure. Include examples to support your answer. 4. Develop a software project management plan for the organization described within the scenario above. Describe the minimum level of detail that should be included within each section of the plan. Include at least two (2) scenarios that may occur if a project is improperly planned. 5. Recommend at least three (3) best practices for software project management strategies for this project. 6. Use at least 5 quality resources in this assignment.

Please watch the video below. Then summarize the similarities & the differences between international and domestic corporate finance. Please elaborate and illustrate with your own example(s) where appropriate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ds5BPkzTDw&list=PLKmyivlcwsOL1FBQTXjKYyVCwuvV2A1-i&index=2

This final conference deals with the final issue any computer forensics examiner, or any other witness to an event will face – testifying under oath to what you know. Each person who testifies is a witness and as we discussed several weeks ago will present testimonial evidence. As an expert witness, which is how a computer forensic examiner will be generally be presented, you are not providing eye-witness testimony to a crime, but are testifying about what you as an expert found or did not find during your collection, preservation, and examination of physical evidence. When you testify on behalf of the government (normally this would be a prosecutor or district attorney), or could be the defense counsel, you will first testify on direct examination – that means the attorney who called you to the stand has to lay certain groundwork to get your testimony about your examination of the evidence before the jury as an expert (known as Voir Dire). Once the preliminary questions have been asked and answered, the attorney handling the direct examination will then turn over examination to the defense. This is often done before you are allowed to answer questions about the actual evidence or case before the court. The reason this is done in this matter is that you are first being presented to the court as an expert in some field. The opposing counsel gets to cross-examine you (Voir Dire) to try to defeat your being named as an expert. In cases where you have already been determined to be an expert by the court on previous occasions and testimony, there is less of a chance the opposing counsel will be successful in discrediting your testimony admissible as an expert. But, for a new examiner, the first couple of times before the court will be more demanding as to your expertise. After both sides had a chance to question your bone fides as an expert, the counsel wishing you to be accepted will make a motion that you be accepted as an expert. Once that is complete, you will be asked about the matter at hand, and will testify to your collection, preservation, and examination of physical evidence. This is also where the opposing counsel will be especially alert for any weakness or contradictions in your testimony. For this week’s discussion, complete the following questions below in detail. Please discuss thoroughly and substantively in your post. Additionally, respond in a thorough, substantive, intelligent way to at least one of your fellow classmates that adds to our discussion and learning of this week’s topic! 1) What are some questions you think that you would be asked initially on direct examination being qualified to testify as an expert? 2) What kind of questions do you think the opposing counsel during Voir Dire will ask you? Remember on cross examination, opposing counsel can ask leading questions to challenge your expertise. 3) Describe why it is important, and how you would testify to limit any contradictions?

Review the video below and address the following questions: 1. What are the main points that you took away from the presentation? 2. Based on your knowledge of the subject, what information could have been included, but was not covered in the presentation?

Discuss irony (dramatic, situational, verbal) in Oedipus Rex by Sophocles. Assume that the audience has already read and discussed the story (no summary of story needed). Two of the outside sources may come from an authoritative web site, but at least one source must come from a juried or peer reviewed print work (book, journal article, or essay) or article from a library database.

There are four actors involved in the budget proposal process. Discuss which of the four actors appear to play the greatest role in the process? Why? Justify your responses with examples

Write an essay describing which of the following statements you think best describes the character of Alice, the second wife. Provide the letter of your choice and briefly defend it. Use at least one example from the selection to support your ideas. a. She is thoughtful person beginning to question the wisdom of her decision. b. She is shallow person easily swayed away by the opinions of others. c. She is happily married person exhibiting natural curiosity. d. Other-Describe Alice in your own words and then defend your statement.