Write a persuasive research paper that expands on a historical content area and relates the historical struggle to current events.

Write a short essay about how the virus attaches to, enters, disrupts, and exits cells.This should also address what you learned about how the virus biology relates to symptoms and disease (pathology). Your essay should address the following questions (in no particular order, as long as it’s logical for you):
1. How does the virus attach to a cell, exactly? I mean:
2. What molecule(s) does it attach to?
3. What is the normal function of that molecule (is it a receptor? If so, what pathway is it involved in and what does that normally do (ex: insulin receptors are expressed on most cells and trigger the release of extra glucose transporters in the target cells). If it’s a cell adhesion molecule, what does it normally bind to (from the other cell) and what type of adhesion molecule is this? [This type of information is covered in more depth in these last 2 chapters of course material. You may want or need to look ahead.]
What cells of the body express that molecule? (You’ll have to do some internet research, but I did provide helpful links).
4. How, exactly, does the virus get into the cell once it has bound? (Passive transport? Active transport? Endocytosis? Pinocytosis? Receptor-mediated endocytosis? Clathrin-coated pits?
What happens to the virus AFTER is it engulfed by the cell, specifically? Is it degraded in a lysosome? Transported in an endosome? Just dumped loose in the cytoplasm?
How are the physical/structural and genomic components of the virus assembled and where in the cell does this occur?
3. How to the structural and genomic components of the virus come together?
6. How do the assembled virions get out of the host cell?
7. Based on the tissues that this virus can bind to, how does this correspond to symptoms reported for COVID-19?
8. Are there any weird symptoms that do NOT correspond to what you learned? Do you think they’re legit? Why or why not?
This essay requires in-text citations for your sources. References should follow the format of the journal Cell (since this class is Cell Biology). References do NOT count toward your word or page length. If your reference does not appear as an in-text citation, it should not be in your references list. DO NOT use MLA or APA format. Science and medical journals actually rarely use those formats, so it is good for you to branch out some and get some experience. I’m including two good ways to do this:
https://www.citethisforme.com/guides/cell/how-to-cite-a-journal
https://paperpile.com/s/cell-citation-style/
Marketing Strategy (White Swan brand)
Brand website: http://www.whiteswanmeta.net/
For the big idea, required to prepare marketing strategy to introduce White swan Brands for medical scrubs to Saudi Market. This should reflect the market Mix and the the barnd eqiity should be emphesise in the assignment. The assginement should link the brand to the Saudi market,
Why this selection? Currently I have franchise shape with Cherokee Scrubs, and welling to expand the business.
1. Executive Summary
2. Brand Overview
Describe the current status of the brand with a brief historical background. Also define the brand’s current and future state on the Product Life Cycle. (the brand is mature) – objective of each product life cycle. Finally discuss the universe of brand performance market mix and market equity.
3. Competition Overview –
– Define competition
– How is the Competitors: Cherokee Scrubs, Gray’s Anatomy, Barco, Kio, Wonder wink (all in KSA available) Beside some local tailor shops ( Meshmar, Al- Khamis, Lab Coat)
– Link it with brand equity, macroenvironment, and value concept and exceptions.
– discuss the customers
4. Target Market –
Define who is being targeted, specify the target market.
Discuss the successive sets involved consumer decision making
Why we chose the target?
5. Segmentation
Geographic, Demographic, Behaviour, Psychographic
Which of these did you use to segment the market? How? Why?
Show how you would use these marketing tools
Describe one of the primary themes found in Catholic Social teachings as explored in the course readings (in the CST course pack). You may choose from any of the themes that we read about, Dignity, the Common Good, Moral Economics, Dignified Labor, etc. Use the primary sources from the course pack to explain the heart of what the teaching is all about, given examples from the text in the form of quotations. Here I am looking for your ability to adequately summarize information you’ve read and that you’ve understood a specific teaching in the Catholic moral tradition.
Section two – Analysis: Explore some challenge people are facing due to COVID-19. This could be any element of the crisis, e.g., health care during a pandemic, business losses, unemployment. Do whatever research possible on the internet to explain the problem and demonstrate how real people are suffering amidst the crisis. Reference any news sites your use and as best you can discern useful from poor journalism. Here I am looking for your informed perspective on what’s going on in real lives based on the limited information available to you.
Section three – Construction: Apply your theme of CST to the problem to offer a concrete solution to the issue. What would a dignified health care system look like? What are the economic responsibilities of a small business owner to their employees during the crisis? How would the federal government ensure the common good in the face of millions of unemployment claims? Here I am looking for the most depth in your thought – if you’re interested in healthcare, show your understanding of the current system and how other proposals concretely function; if you’re interested in federal responses, show some knowledge of the currently CARE act and what you think is needed in future acts. Show some evidence that you’ve done research into concrete practice or policy and so that you can realistically wrestle with ethics can potentially shape political action.
Drawing specific examples from the assigned reading and interview, write a paper (1,000 – 1.250 words) explaining how second-wave feminism affected American views on women in the workforce.
Begin by briefly explaining the the historical context in which second wave feminism emerged. Then, analyze the documents and explain how they illustrate the influence of feminism (or not) on the debate about women in the workforce.
Conclude with a discussion of how the documents provide evidence (or not) of change over time in attitudes toward women.
Prepare
To prepare for this assignment, carefully read Brown and Shannon, Going to the Source, vol. 2 CAPSTONE: Organizing Their Lives: Women, Work, and Family, 1950– 2000. Complete the source table to help you analyze the documents before you write. If you need additional sources, use the resources listed under “To Find Out More” at the end of the chapter. IMPORTANT: You may not use any other outside sources except those specifically listed in the chapter.
Chapter 6 briefly discusses judicial interpretivists and strict constructionists. For more discussion on the issue read “How does the Supreme Court decide what the Constitution means?” How does a strict constructionist (originalist) interpret the Constitution compared to a judicial interpretivist (non-originalist)? Do you think the Constitution should be interpreted literally or is it an evolving document that needs to be interpreted differently over time? Why? Use examples of potential (or real) cases and demonstrate how a strict constructionaist and a judicial interpretivist would rule in these cases.
How does the Supreme Court decide what the Constitution means?