Category: Essay Help

magine you work in a correctional institution and have been asked to create a strategy plan for working with specific correctional populations. Your supervisor would like you to create an executive summary of your strategy.Select 1 correctional population to focus on.Write a 525- to 700-word executive summary in which you:Describe elements in the classification process. Explain the importance of proper classification.Discuss what challenges are associated with special populations, such as mental ill and elderly, in the prison system. Provide examples.Explain strategies or considerations that are used to service special populations.

magine you work in a correctional institution and have been asked to create a strategy plan for working with specific correctional populations. Your supervisor would like you to create an executive summary of your strategy.Select 1 correctional population to focus on.Write a 525- to 700-word executive summary in which you:Describe elements in the classification process. Explain the importance of proper classification.Discuss what challenges are associated with special populations, such as mental ill and elderly, in the prison system. Provide examples.Explain strategies or considerations that are used to service special populations.

magine you work in a correctional institution and have been asked to create a strategy plan for working with specific correctional populations. Your supervisor would like you to create an executive summary of your strategy.Select 1 correctional population to focus on.Write a 525- to 700-word executive summary in which you:Describe elements in the classification process. Explain the importance of proper classification.Discuss what challenges are associated with special populations, such as mental ill and elderly, in the prison system. Provide examples.Explain strategies or considerations that are used to service special populations.

ANALYZING DIFFERENT SIDES OF AN ISSUEFor each of the following issues, identify reasons that support each side of the issue. Issue:Issue:1. Multiple choice and true/false exams should be given in collegelevel courses.Multiple choice and true/false exams should not be given in college-level courses.Issue:2. Immigration quotas should be reduced.Immigration quotas should be increased.Issue:3. The best way to deal with crime is to give long prison sentences.Long prison sentences will not reduce crime.Issue:4. When a couple divorces, the children should choose the parent with whom they wish to live.When a couple divorces, the court should decide all custody issues regarding the children

In your final paper, you were required to evaluate the morality of Aeneas’ killing of Turnus in light of Stoic ethics, Stoicism being the closest thing to real religion the Roman upper class of Vergil’s time would acknowledge. In so doing, you were to review various possible sources for inspiration. Now, in this final examination question, I am slightly reversing the terms. Vergil intended, at least in part, to portray Aeneas as the embodiment of all that was great among the Romans. For your final exam, consider if Aeneas was, in fact, a good Roman, and would he have been a good emperor. Remember, when Vergil died, there had only been an emperor for 8 years or so, too little time to provide an adequate comparison base.For material on which to base your answer, look to Horace’s Roman Odes (sent earlier), works that in various ways defined a good Roman; the Centennial Hymn; the lives of M. Antoninus and Trajan, two of the greatest Roman emperors; and Augustus’ own political testament, the Res Gestae, (which achieved final form around 14 A.D.). All these should offer suitable material for comparison. The life of Commodus provides a negative example. You should address in your answer at least some of the following: was Aeneas a great general; did he lead and inspire his men; was he really pious; did he, like Augustus, strive for long-lasting results; did he show true Roman virtus, which has as its first definition courage, but also encompasses all the things that make a man, as the Romans understood the word (vir being the Latin word for husband and, by extension, father as well); was he a builder; does the evidence suggest he would have been famous on his own, or did he need Vergil to make him famous? You can also employ the relevant sections of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Livy, and the Origo to answer the question. You must cite relevant sections of the Odes, the Res Gestae, and the Lives, as well as the Aeneid, to justify your arguments. If you use Livy, Dionysius, or the Origo, you must cite those as well.For Horace, cite by book, poem and line #, e.g., Odes 3.5 and then line.For the Res Gestae, Res.Ges. or R.G. and section number.For the lives, the standard is the name of the emperor and, in this case, the page # (not quite the way scholars would do it, but the translation lacks the true section numbers found In the Latin version).For Livy, Dionysius, and Origo, you already know, or should.

Watch : Michael Moore Presents: Planet of the Humans | Full Documentary | Directed by Jeff GibbsUse three supporting evidence from the film and the article to answer the following: Is the film dangerous because it supports climate denial, or, does the film honestly expose the problems with renewable energy and the corporate takeover of the environmental agenda?

The three principles of control are: 1. The buck stops with the project manager2. Project managers need accurate, timely information3. Many eyes are better than two, and many brains are better than oneFrom your research, what new information could be added to one of the three principles? Which principle can you relate to most readily, due to your experience in the workplace?

The paper must be no more than two pages long, and your questions are based on questions that you have already answered in the discussion forum. You must cite two sources in your answer: one has to be a work of historical scholarship that we have read in class, while the other can be either a primary source, or another secondary source from our class readings. Please use footnotes. Question:1.What can we learn from the massive size and scope of the Holocaust? What does it teach us about: a.The scale of prejudice and indifference, andb.The fatal potential of our own institutional structures today?

Part 1: Watch the movieWatch the film The Matrix.

Part 2: Write a paperWrite a 2 page paper (double spaced) in which you do the following:Briefly discuss 2-3 philosophical themes in the film. When doing so, briefly discuss (1) the theme and (2) how the theme appears in the film. Be sure to refer to specific scenes, dialogue (if possible), and characters.Philosophical themes discussed thus far that might have appeared in the film:–Whether the unexamined life is not worth living
-Whether you would rather live an examined or unexamined life
-Whether God exists
-Whether pleasure/happiness is the ultimate good
-Whether a life of ignorance and happiness is more worthwhile than a life of
truth and unhappiness
-Whether humans can have knowledge of anything
-Whether the way the world appears to us (through our senses) is how the world
really is
-Whether our senses can provide us with knowledge of the world
-Whether human have free will

Roland Barthes and MythologiesPlease read the following sections in Roland Barthes’s Mythologies:8 – 105107 – 136.Note: Do not follow the PDF numbers. Please read the page numbers written in the book.Please read the following JSTOR article:Paul De Man, “Roland Barthes and the Limits of Structuralism.”https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/roland-barthes-myths-we-dont-outgrowPlease read the following article:Marco Roth, “Roland Barthes: Myths We Don’t Outgrow.”For this discussion, respond to two of the five prompts below:1. Regarding the “Myth Today” section of the text, discuss Barthes and his assessment of how mythmaking happens at the institutional, cultural, social, and individual levels. How do these elements function both individually and in conjunction? What is the value of myth-as-speech with respect to these four discrete distinctions? Explain.2. Select any two myths Barthes discussed in the “Mythologies” section of the text, and evaluate his individual assessments from a contemporary perspective. What elements of these myths strike the contemporary reader as significant, and why? Explain.3. Barthes assessed elements of popular culture in Mythologies that fix his evaluation in a specific place and time. While the time between the publication of his work and the present is significant, there are noteworthy overlaps regarding his subject matter and a contemporary perspective. Select any two individual myths that maintain a relative topicality, and explain how this continuity exists.4. Summarize the primary arguments in Paul De Man’s article “Roland Barthes and the Limits of Structuralism” and in Marco Roth’s article assessment of Barthes and his influence. Is the overall assessment of each positive, negative, or neutral?5. How does Campbell’s position on the message of myth differ from Barthes’s? Select one specific example, and discuss why this example matters to your larger understanding of myth.