The Black Lives Matter movement is important, real, significant, and valuable.Missed Mark? Or Over Sensitivity?

Clearly the controversy was real, and clearly it was fueled by media such as this news coverage, but was the controversy warranted? What do you think? Before you respond, please consider the following statements (any of which you are free to reference or challenge in your response): Television news shows are *for profit* businesses. They exist to make money. Television shows (including the news) make money by getting your attention. (That’s why you will never see a news story about the seven billion people who made it home safe and sound last night. Too boring!) The more attention a show gets, the more money it can charge its advertisers. Television news need to be sensationalized to turn heads.They find a “hot” button and they push it. You turn your head and look. You “pay” with your attention. Also: television news is a 24/7 thing these days, that means they have to “find” (or manufacture) a lot of hot buttons, and milk each one until no one is looking anymore. The Black Lives Matter movement is important, real, significant, and valuable. It exists to forward social change. Like all social movements, the Black Lives Matter movement needs media coverage in order to be taken seriously, stay on the public agenda, and further its cause. People jump on bandwagons when they see, hear, or read in the media that a.) there is a bandwagon to jump on, and b.) a lot of other people are jumping on that bandwagon. In this case, was there genuine insensitivity on the part of Pepsi? Or did the news media throw Pepsi under the bus to get your attention and make a profit? Or did Pepsi do something tone-deaf on purpose to get news coverage? And were people honestly offended? Or did the Black Lives Matter movement (perhaps wisely) take advantage of a genuine media opportunity to further its cause? And did most people even see the ad before reacting? Or were they responding to the rising tide of social outcry from everyone else, which was amplified by the media? And what about YOU? Did you see the ad and feel it was offensive or culturally tone deaf before becoming aware of any related news coverage? Did you conclude that Pepsi had made a blunder before you even saw the ad?

Explain how the theory (Criminology)relates to crime.Criminology

This unit reviewed the biological school of crime. For this scholarly activity, you will explain two theories of crime based on body chemistry theories and two theories of crime based on psychological theories. Examples include chemistry theories like atavism, low blood sugar, or high levels of testosterone and psychological theories like personality characteristics, moral development, or psychosis. In your explanation of each theory, include responses to the following bullets: Explain the basic concepts of each theory. Explain how the theory relates to crime. Is there research to substantiate this theory? Explain whether or not you personally feel the theory is acceptable as a potential reason for crime.

Identify the key roles and organizational issues through a brief introductory paragraph

•Identify the key roles and organizational issues through a brief introductory paragraph (this is not the abstract page).•Integrate specific theories from the attached textbook material for the type of organization. •Provide your personal perspective on the case, applying theories, perspectives, and structures you along with alternatives that could be best integrated to address the participant’s concerns.

Write a Pygmalion Essay discussing the expectations of women’s manners and behaviour differ between classes, as seen through Eliza’s transformation.

To practice analyzing literature using critical theory, and to show an understanding of the work read.1.In the play Pygmalion, G. B. Shaw discusses the importance of social class in English society in the early 20th century, focusing on accent as a key marker of socioeconomic class. Discuss one or more of the following topics. c.The expectations of women’s manners and behaviour differ between classes, as seen through Eliza’s transformation.

Provide an overview of the technical and social terminology for organizations today.

1.Provide an overview of the technical and social terminology for organizations today. Within the discussion be sure to address the following areas:2.How do each of these apply to the three perspectives (natural, rational, and open)?3.What areas of technology are an issue for participants?4.What are the issues with organizational boundaries for participants?5.Personal perspectives6.Include any theoretical viewpoints for each of these areas. (natural, rational, and open)Link to textbook: https://1drv.ms/b/s!AiUgUX70FawcvwwOkQlpIliKiWKBTextbook: Scott, W. R., Davis, G. F. (2015). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives. United States: Taylor & Francis.