Discuss at least 4 long term and 3 short term goals for therapy with this client based on assisting the client with the diagnosis and problems/issues/characteristics discussed in Sections 1 and 2.

Signature Assignment: Clinical Application Paper Advanced Individual Counseling– Implement theory and techniques from multiple orientations to therapeutic problems of individuals. Overview of the Assignment: Students will be given a number of vignettes from which to choose to use for this paper. Students will choose one vignette and write a paper that details ALL the items listed below. Be sure to completely and thoroughly complete all items in order to receive full-points. Use headings for each section. Review the rubric before beginning this paper in order to thoroughly understand the basis upon which this paper will be graded. This paper is worth 160 points. Note: You may also want to review the Sample Assessment/Treatment Plan Paper provided under the Course Information tab, as the tasks for this paper are very similar. Instructions: First, carefully review the vignette, then write a paper that includes all of the following information. Be sure to complete all six sections thoroughly and completely. 1) Diagnosis: a) Provide client’s diagnosis using DSM-5. Include all modifiers and/or specifiers. Provide at least 4 symptoms that the client meets for the diagnosis you chose. 2) Other therapeutic issues: a) Description and discussion of at least 6 other relevant therapeutic issues/problems and client characteristics (in addition to their diagnosis) such as relationship, occupational, financial, legal, ethical, social or other related life stressor or issues, ethnicity, race, religion, family/marital status, sexual orientation, age, gender identification, strengths, or other biopsychosocial or environmental factors and/or client characteristics that may be highly relevant to therapy with this client. b) Discussion of how the issues/characteristics you describe may potentially impact therapy either positively, negatively, or both. 3) Referrals: a) Description of at least 2 referrals you would make for this client and why. 4) Goals: a) Discuss at least 4 long term and 3 short term goals for therapy with this client based on assisting the client with the diagnosis and problems/issues/characteristics discussed in Sections 1 and 2. b) Describe why you chose these goals. 5) Therapies: a) Description and brief discussion of two evidence-based /empirically validated theoretical orientations covered in this class (i.e. ACT, IPT or DBT), b) Discuss how each of the two orientations could be used with this client based on client’s diagnosis/problems/issues and personal characteristics. Complete sections a and b for each orientation separately. You must use a minimum of 2 references for each orientation in this section. 6) Treatment Plans: Create two separate treatment plans to meet the goals you described in Section Four using the two different theoretical orientations you used to answer Section Five. For each orientation the plan should include the following: a) name and describe at least one intervention/technique from the orientation that you would use to help the client accomplish each goal. (There should be at least one intervention/technique discussed for each goal from Section 4.), b) provide an example of how you would use each of the named interventions/techniques with this particular client to meet each goal, c) discuss how using each of the named interventions/techniques would help the client to reach the goal. Note: For this section you may use the same technique to meet more than one goal, but be sure to separately provide an example for how the technique would be used to meet each goal and how it would help the client to reach the goal. Additional Information and Requirements: This paper should be between 10 and 15 pages in APA format, not including title and reference pages. You do not need to include an abstract for this paper. Be sure to cite and reference (7) any sources you use. Not citing or referencing sources is a form of plagiarism, so be sure to cite and reference ALL sources. You are allowed to use portions of other assignments you have completed for this course ONLY to complete this paper (i.e. you may use work you did for the vignette assignments on Blackboard or the Assessment/Treatment Plan papers you wrote in this course in this paper.) You may not use work from other courses. I WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH THE VIGNETTE WHEN YOU ACCEPT THE JOB.

Write a review on Friday Night Lights by: Buzz Bissinger.

Review the book Friday Night LIghts by Buzz Bissinger Please submit your review in a Word document. Please make sure that your review is in one document consisting of a Cover Page, your review (about 3 pages), and a Works Cited page. Please see details in Supplemental Information for my grading rubric Writing an Historical Book Review Writing a book review as an assignment in a history course is designed to promote at least four important objectives: (1) effective writing, (2)) substantive knowledge about a particular historical topic, (3) the development of a historical perspective and an understanding of the nature and use of historical research, and (4) an ability to think critically about the work of others. A typical summary “book report” can at best teach only the first two objectives. A critical book review goes beyond mere summary to inquire into the overall worth of the work. There are six steps to preparing a review of a historical work. With some modifications, these steps also apply to writing reviews of other nonfiction works. NOTE: All submissions are subject to being checked for plagiarism using the software program “Turn-It In.” This program checks each submission against a host of sources including previously submitted papers on the subject at Lone Star College. Academic integrity is a serious matter. If you have a question on this item review the college policy outlined in the syllabus. 1. Select a book. Three books have been selected to augment the text book for this course. Each additional reading should be read and reviewed during its respective unit of the course as outlined in the syllabus. 2. Determine the purpose of the book and the intended audience. The best place to determine both purpose and audience is usually in the preface, foreword, or introduction. What demand did the author intend to fulfill with the book? Did the author write because there was no satisfactory work available on the subject? Did the writer feel that he or she had a new point of view on a well-worn topic? Perhaps the author wrote a popular account of a subject about which previous works had been dull and dry. Ascertaining the author’s purpose is important. The writer should be judged by whether he or she achieved what he or she set out to accomplish. Also determine the audience for which the work is intended. Was the work directed mainly at professional historians, college students, or the general public? 3. Learn the author’s qualifications and viewpoint. Find out the author’s academic background. Is the author a journalist, a professor, or a professional writer? Has this writer published other books on related topics? Consult your library catalog; check Who’s Who in America, Contemporary Authors, Directory of American Scholars, or other directories. Viewpoint, however, is generally more important than credentials, since an author must be judged mainly by the quality of the particular work you are examining. A Pulitzer Prize winner may later write an undistinguished book. But many first books, often derived from the author’s doctoral dissertations, are outstanding. Knowing the author’s point of view, however, may put a reader on guard for certain biases. A Marxist historian will often write from a predictable perspective, as will an extreme rightist. Biographers are often biased for or against their subjects. For example, after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, many of his intimates, most notably Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. wrote biographical works. A reviewer could not adequately analyze Schlesinger’s Thousand Days without knowing something about his close relationship with the slain president. Look for information on point of view in prefatory materials, in the body of the book, and in reference works with entries about the author. The best place to find information on authors is in the Contemporary Authors database by Gale. Here’s how to get there: From Lone Star College Homepage click on Library. Next click Find. Next select Article Databases. Next Databases listed in Alphabetical Order. Next Contemporary Authors. You will then be asked for your library card number and once you enter it you will be in the database. Once in the database simply fill in the author’s name and you will receive a wealth of info about him/her. 4. Read the book. Read critically and analytically. Be sure to identify the author’s thesis — the main argument of the book. Look for secondary theses and other important points. See how the author uses evidence and examples to support arguments. Are his or her sources adequate and convincing? Does the author rely mainly on primary — firsthand, documentary — sources or on secondary sources? Consider the author’s style and presentation. Is the book well organized? Is the prose lively, direct, and clear? Take notes as you read so that you can return to particularly important passages or especially revealing quotations. Remember that being critical means being rational and thoughtful, not necessarily negative. 5. Outline the review. The following outline is only a suggestion; it is not a model that you should necessarily follow for all reviews. You may find it appropriate to add, combine, separate, eliminate, or rearrange some points. Your paper should be in essay format (not showing this outline). I. Introduction A. Purpose of the book B. Author’s qualifications and viewpoint II. Critical summary A. Thesis of the book B. Summary of contents, indicating how the thesis is developed (Use examples. While this will generally be the longest part of the review, you should make sure that your paper does not become a mere summary without critical analysis.) C. Author’s use of evidence to support the thesis and secondary points (avoid numerous direct quotes in a short essay.) III. Style and presentation A. Organization of the book B. Writing style (word choice, paragraph structure, wit, readability, length, etc.) IV. Conclusion A. Historical contribution of the book (How does the book fit into the prevailing interpretation of the topic? Does it break new ground? Does it answer a troublesome question? Does it revise older interpretations? Does it merely clarify and simplify the standard point of view? You may need to consult other sources when considering this point.) B. Overall worth of the book (Would you recommend it? For what type of audience would it be best suited? Did the author accomplish the intended purpose?) 6. Book Review Information Sources The Lone Star College library has two great data bases available on line which are great aids for this. To access these databases first go to http://www.lonestar.edu/library/ and in the left column click on List of Databases. In the next window in the right column click on History and you will see several databases that can be used in exploring history subjects. There are two data bases in this list which are especially useful for viewing professionally written book reviews they are: (1) EBSCO Academic Search Premier and (2) JSTOR. To use EBSCO click on it. If logging in from home you will be asked for your library card number and once you enter it you will be directed to the database. Once in the database click on Advanced Search at the top of the page. In the next window look for the FIND: block type your book title. In the next block to the right (a pull down menu) select TI Title. In the second line block which has a pull down menu select PS Reviews and Products. Next click Search and a list of available reviews will appear. Select the ones you wish to review and you will get some ideas of how a good review should look. To use JSTOR click on it. Again if logging in from home you will be asked to enter your library card number and once you enter it you will be directed to the database. Once in the database click on Search. Next, click on Advanced Search. In the next window in the block for all of these words type your book title. Next narrow your search by checking the box for Title. In the next line click the box for Review. Next scroll down the page and check the box for History – 15 Journals. To start the search, scroll to the bottom of the page and click on Search. Next a list of all the reviews available will appear. You can click on Review to get an onscreen view of the review but if your internet connection is the least bit slow this can be time consuming. Another way to get the info is by clicking on Download in the last line of each review listed. This will bring up a window for you to select the format for the download. I recommend selecting PDF Economy. This will call up the file using Adobe Reader and you can read, print or save the review. Note however this function will require that Adobe Reader software be installed on your computer but it is a free download from the adobe.com web site. A good book review should contain information about the author to establish his/her credibility. The review should include something about the author’s education, examples of other works published, awards received, organizational memberships and current position. This information is readily available from other databases from the Tomball library. To find these databases go to the library homepage at http://www.lonestar.edu/library/ and in the left column click on List of Databases (Alphabetical). In the next window under the column titled Databases by title click on C and select Contemporary Authors. In the next window you enter your authors name in the box for Authors Name and click Search. Next you will be given a list of authors if more than one is available. Select your authors name and you will be given a wealth of information about the individual. 7. Write the review Follow your outline. Use standard written English. When in doubt, consult The McGraw-Hill College Handbook or similar reference. Most historical works use the Chicago format rather than MLA. I. Some guidance on how to submit your book reviews. Write your review in a word processor like Microsoft WORD. Save your work in a rich text format (.rtf file). After saving your work, enter the course and locate the Turnitin.com drop box for that book. Create a title with your last name and the title of the book. I will grade the work and leave comments in My Grades. Please review the rubric below for my grading policy. II. The cover page should contain in the center of the page the title of the work under review. (Reviews seldom have titles of their own.) Below the title should appear your name. Toward the bottom of the page should be your course number (History 1301, 1302, or 2301), and the date submitted. III. The review should be printed double-spaced using Arial style 12 point type and the left and right margins should be set at 1.25 inches. The typical review should be no longer than three pages plus your cover sheet and Works Cited page. IV. If you quote from the book under review, simply follow the quotation with the page number(s) in parentheses. For example: “The author makes the incredible assertion, ‘Jefferson turned out to be America’s worst president’ (p. 345).” Avoid numerous direct quotes in a short paper. V. If you properly research the author’s background information or cite other sources for quotations, points of view, or facts, use a standard citation style. If you use any outside sources, be sure to include a Works Cited page. In other words, if you looked it up, you must cite it. Please be sure to read Avoiding Plagiarism located under Supplemental information. If it is not your own work, then cite your source! Go to Purdue Owl.com – Chicago Style to see examples of citations – click on the media file sample paper and scroll down to learn about proper citations. https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/717/11/ VI. Don’t be afraid to be critical of the book because your professor has selected it to read or you are intimidated by the credentials of the author. If you don’t like the book say so but be sure to explain why you don’t like the book. VII. Writing this review is not difficult. You can do well on the assignment if you follow the basic guidelines above. You may find it helpful to read published book reviews as a guide to the preparation of your own review. Most historical journals, including the American Historical Review and the Journal of American History, publish many short reviews at the end of each issue. Reviews in American History, which prints longer reviews, is especially useful. To determine where reviews of the particular book you have chosen have been published, consult the Book Review Digest or the Book Review Index. Assume that your audience is college educated and well read, but do not assume that your hypothetical reader has an in-depth knowledge about the subject of the book under review. Lone Star College has several services available to help you prepare an excellent assignment. The first is the Extended Learning Centers (ELC) located on each of our campuses. Each ELC has a section strictly devoted to writing. For the Cy-Fair Campus Learning Center go to: http://www.lonestar.edu/tlclabs.htm or distance learning students who may not have ready access to one of these services an on-line aid is available called SMARTHINKING. For access to this aid, go to: http://online.lonestar.edu/121620/. Links to the Writing Center and SMARTHINKING are located in the “My Tools” section of the class. 8. The Rubric The table below is a rubric that I will use to grade your review. You can also use the rubric before you submit your assignment to “self-grade” your own review. Accomplishing this step will prevent you from overlooking one of the requirements for the assignment. Objective/ Criteria Performance Indicators Not Acceptable Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceptional Total Points Cover Sheet No cover sheet (0 pts) Cover Sheet is included as outlined in the assignment requirements (5 pts) Required Font Required font not used (0 pts) Arial, 12 pt font is used as outlined in the assignment requirements (5 pts) Author Background Information; Properly Cited in Review & Works Cited Page Biographical information is minimal or missing entirely. (0 pts) Biographical information does not include two of these categories – education, other historical works or career achievements.(5 pts) Biographical information does not include one of these categories – education, other historical works or career achievements.(10 pts) Biographical information is provided including education, other historical works and career achievements.(15 pts) Theme/Thesis Author’s thesis or presentation of the biographical subject is not stated (0 pts) Author’s thesis or presentation of the biographical subject is not clearly stated (5 pts) Author’s thesis or presentation of the biographical subject is somewhat clearly stated (10 pts) Author’s thesis or presentation of the biographical subject is clearly stated (15 pts) Spelling The review contains an abundance of spelling errors that detract the reader from the content. (0 pts) The review contains several spelling errors. (5 pts) The review contains a few spelling errors. (10 pts) The review contains no spelling errors. (15 pts) Grammar The review contains an abundance of grammatical errors that detract the reader from the content. (0 pts) The review contains several grammatical errors. (5 pts) The review contains a few grammatical errors. 10 pts) The review contains no grammatical errors. (15 pts) Style/Readability Big problems in sentence structure, grammar and diction. Frequent major errors in punctuation, citation style and spelling. May have many run-on sentences and comma splices. (0 pts) Problems in sentence structure, grammar and diction. Errors in punctuation, citation style and spelling. May have several run-on sentences or comma splices. (5 pts) Sentence structure, grammar and diction strong despite occasional lapses. Punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some (minor) spelling errors; May have one run-on sentence or comma splice. (10 pts) Sentence structure, grammar and diction excellent; correct use of punctuation and citation style; minimal to no spelling errors; no run-on sentences or comma splices. (15 pts) Recommendation No recommendation given. (0 pts) Recommendation given with no explanation. (5 pts) Recommendation given with limited explanation. (10 pts) Recommendation given with clear and complete explanation. (15 pts)

Discuss Leadership and Management in Healthcare Administration.

In this discussion, post a single 3- or 4-paragraph response that addresses the following prompts: Analyze the difference between leadership and management. Discuss why understanding the difference between the two is critical to a healthcare professional’s success. Examine some of the competencies that are required of leaders and managers in a healthcare setting. Discuss whether you consider yourself a leader or manager in your current position.

In addition, review the Points to Ponder Scenario in the Unit VII Lesson for additional information as well as Chapter 6 in the textbook.

Section I As you make suggestions to improve the fire protection system, identify the components and accessories common to fire pump installations needed for the rebuild of the warehouse. Refer back to the background information, if needed, to provide you with the necessary material to identify the basic components common to fire protection for the City of Washington Distribution Warehouse. In addition, review the Points to Ponder Scenario in the Unit VII Lesson for additional information as well as Chapter 6 in the textbook. This assignment is not looking for compliance with building codes nor expecting you to be a fire protection system designer. However, the purpose of this assignment is for you to apply the concepts and knowledge you learned in this unit as you begin writing your final project covering protection systems that will detect, contain, control, and extinguish a fire. In addition, this assignment provides you with the opportunity to use your skills, expertise, and experience to enrich your response. Prepare a well-organized narrative addressing fire pumps and including your recommendations after reviewing the background information and the information above. Your discussion will consist of your evaluation of the previous fire pump and recommendations for the rebuild of the warehouse, based on information from the textbook and any additional research. Section II As we saw in the Points to Ponder Scenario in the unit lesson, electrical surge protection devices could have mitigated damage or even loss to the pump driver. Describe the benefits that surge protection devices provide for fire pump components and systems against the damages of voltage surges. For this assignment, you will write a two-page narrative (one page per section) supporting your position.

Describe Personality disorders vs. mood disorders.

include one peer-reviewed source from our Schools library database Naugatuck Valley Community College http://nvcc.libguides.com/databasesplease select Psychology and Behavioral Scienceslisted under the Health, Science, and Social Sciences

Artist Manager Checklist / Artist Profile

You’ll be doing research on an up-and-coming ARTIST (singer), her name is Gabriela Bee.The necessary research to complete the requirements of the Assignment will be on the documents attached. You will have to include;GENERAL INFORMATION on the Artist, IMAGE, TARGET AUDIENCE, and ADDITIONAL Information about websites, social media, available music, licensed materials, merchandise, affiliations, etc.PLEASE BE SURE TO READ THE INSTRUCTIONS on the Assignment. And NO need to include the cover page.

Principles of Sustainable Tourism Final – Stakeholder Immersion – B&B

You are being assigned a role in a hypothetical town faced with an unexpected explosion of tourism. Please read through the entire assignment carefully before beginning.You will be writing this paper in the first person, assuming the role of your assigned stakeholder.Setting the Stage – The Current Situation in Destiny, ArizonaThe town of Destiny, Arizona has existed quietly outside of Flagstaff near the Grand Canyon National Park for many years. Recently, though, a very well-known celebrity vacationed at the small Destiny Inn B&B in the town and pictures of their wonderful vacation emerged in magazines and websites everywhere. Business is now booming for everyone and the town is overrun with tourists. While the influx of spending is great, it has become clear that growth is quickly on the way and some actions need to be taken to manage it.Land has already been purchased on the edge of town by a large national hotel chain, and they have proposed the building of a large 200-room “eco-friendly” luxury resort and conference center. The potential tax income could provide desperately needed improvements in local schools and infrastructure such as roads and a water treatment plant, and will significantly increase the marketing budget of the local tourism marketing office.To build this resort, though, a great deal of land will undergo construction and clearing, and the property will be located alongside the Destiny River, which is very popular with kayakers.In addition, the Destiny Riverside Nature Preserve is a 300-acre wildlife preserve with a few rudimentary trails that is exactly opposite the proposed resort on the other side of the river. The resort has proposed a footbridge across the river to access the Nature Preserve, but has offered no funding or assistance with improving the trails or preparing for an influx of new tourists from the resort. The Nature Preserve gets a small annual stipend from the Town to pay for a director and maintenance/upkeep, and it does not currently charge any admission fees or have any other source of revenue.Many of the residents of the Town of Destiny are older; some who have retired there from other locations and some who have lived their entire lives there. Residents are very polarized on the issue of the resort – some see the value of the increased tax income and business growth, some moved to Destiny for its small-town charm and don’t want to see that destroyed, and some are extremely concerned with the potential environmental impact that a large resort will have on the beautiful yet fragile local natural environment.An outside sustainable development specialist has been hired to moderate a major stakeholder meeting which will gain input from key local stakeholders involved in this development decision.Each stakeholder will bring a different agenda to the table, based on their interests and responsibilities to their own stakeholders (e.g. voting public, business investors, guests, etc.).Amazingly it just so happens that all of them have, at some point, studied sustainable tourism in college!The stakeholders at this table are:* Director of the Destiny Riverside Nature Preserve* Corporate Manager in charge of the Destiny Luxury Eco Resort development* Mayor of Destiny, Arizona* Resident of Destiny and current chair of the Destiny Rotary Club* Director ofDestination Destiny, the local tourism marketing officeAnd YOU, who are assuming the role of Owner of the Destiny Inn B&B.The specialist has asked that you prepare a short (up to 3-page) document stating:1) Your position on the development of the Destiny Luxury Eco Resort2) Concerns you may have about the impact (if any), and3) What your best case scenario/outcome is based on the role you represent.Finally, he asks that you consider the long-term sustainability of the project (and community as a whole) and the likely concerns of the other stakeholders at the table. In your conclusion, indicate some compromises you’re willing to make (if any) to address the long-term sustainability of Destiny, Arizona as a tourism destination.