Category: Essay Help

Assignment InstructionsPlease address one of the following questions in a 3-4 page research paper, complete with bibliography and citations. Be sure to demonstrate your command of the content, reasoning and logic, and above all you need a single main point in your introduction that is then substantiated and defended in the body of your paper. Please make your paper as professional as possible, with citations, cover page, etc.Answer ONE of the questions below.What ought to be the proper role of Congress in Strategic Intelligence? Is there a proper role in oversight of strategic intelligence activities, in ensuring that the policy expressed in budget and appropriations laws is being followed, in ensuring that the will of the people and the necessity of national security is being carried out properly by the executive branch of government?OR:Describe and explain the Church Committee hearings in the 1970s. What impact did it have on the U.S. Intelligence Community? If you choose this topic, here is one reference to consider: Schwarz, Frederick A. O. 2007. “The Church Committee and a New Era of Intelligence Oversight.” Intelligence and National Security 22 (2): 270-97. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1080/02684520701303881 OR:Congressional investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election created significant issues and controversies. House and Senate investigations seemed to come to different conclusions. Develop and analyze the main issues with these investigations, what went wrong, and what can be done to improve such oversight activities of the IC in the future. Also, please review the attached literacy information tools to help with your research and writing of this paper. Please follow the below requirements:General Requirements1. Document Format.a. MS Word documentb. One-inch (1”) margins (double-spaced)c. Times New Roman Fontd. Twelve (12) pitch2. Citation Format: The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017 available online at: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html The Author-Date system is recommended.3. Graphics are allowed and encouraged (but they don’t count on length).4. Students must (1) employ imaginative approaches to answer the question being asked; (2) display an impressive command of the subject matter beyond the immediately obvious; (3) demonstrate a high level of critical thinking and reflecting on current and world views, and genuine intellectual development; and (4) excel in explaining all major points using multiple examples from the course readings or individual research.

For your initial post, discuss the two topics below Describe Cybersecurity Training programs at your own organization (frequency, use of automation, certification after finishing, etc). How is cybersecurity training at your organization designed to successfully overcome resistance to changing users’ poor cybersecurity habits? Should cybersecurity training be designed to correspond to different categories for individual roles and responsibilities in an organization? Explain your answer.

Article review:https://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=138267802&S=R&D=aph&EbscoContent=dGJyMMvl7ESep684y9f3OLCmsEiep7ZSsai4TbWWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGsrkyyrrJKuePfgeyx44Dt6fIABriefly summarize the study. Analysis could go beyond this summary. Consider the following questions in the analysis.Why was this study undertaken?What was known at the time that it was published?What was the question being addressed?How was it addressed, and what were the results?Are the results sufficient for the author(s)’ stated conclusions, and why or why not?How might you improve on the study?

Instructions:I need propose 3 topics below for a friendly class-wide dialogue regarding your ideas.oAnecdotal accounts (personal stories) are fun and useful in small doses. Still, factual support and logic are irreplaceable.oProvide quotations and links from reputable sources. Forceful argumentation is built on solid data.oUse the rhetorical techniques from our class, including concessio (acknowledging the other side’s validity), dubitatio (expressing doubt or objective skepticism about your own position), eunoi (having a fair-minded character), decorum, inductive reasoning, and so on. •BTW, my role here is to encourage, play the devil’s advocate, offer alternative POVs, sometimes take up an unpopular position just to give it representation, and generally try to keep things fun and collegial! oTopics: 1-How about a debate on the reopening of our state parks for outdoor exercise in light of COVID-19?2-Let’s debate whether audio-books are better than reading physical books. 3-Let’s debate whether sex work should be legal!

address one of the following questions in a 3-4 page research paper, complete with bibliography and citations. Be sure to demonstrate your command of the content, reasoning and logic, and above all you need a single main point in your introduction that is then substantiated and defended in the body of your paper. Please make your paper as professional as possible, with citations, cover page, etc.Answer ONE of the questions below.What ought to be the proper role of Congress in Strategic Intelligence? Is there a proper role in oversight of strategic intelligence activities, in ensuring that the policy expressed in budget and appropriations laws is being followed, in ensuring that the will of the people and the necessity of national security is being carried out properly by the executive branch of government?OR:Describe and explain the Church Committee hearings in the 1970s. What impact did it have on the U.S. Intelligence Community? If you choose this topic, here is one reference to consider: Schwarz, Frederick A. O. 2007. “The Church Committee and a New Era of Intelligence Oversight.” Intelligence and National Security 22 (2): 270-97. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1080/02684520701303881 OR:Congressional investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election created significant issues and controversies. House and Senate investigations seemed to come to different conclusions. Develop and analyze the main issues with these investigations, what went wrong, and what can be done to improve such oversight activities of the IC in the future. Also, please review the attached literacy information tools to help with your research and writing of this paper. Please follow the below requirements:General Requirements1. Document Format.a. MS Word documentb. One-inch (1”) margins (double-spaced)c. Times New Roman Fontd. Twelve (12) pitch2. Citation Format: The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017 available online at: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html The Author-Date system is recommended.3. Graphics are allowed and encouraged (but they don’t count on length).4. Students must (1) employ imaginative approaches to answer the question being asked; (2) display an impressive command of the subject matter beyond the immediately obvious; (3) demonstrate a high level of critical thinking and reflecting on current and world views, and genuine intellectual development; and (4) excel in explaining all major points using multiple examples from the course readings or individual research.

Discuss Fidel Castro’s importance during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Assignment InstructionsPlease address one of the following questions in a 3-4 page research paper, complete with bibliography and citations. Be sure to demonstrate your command of the content, reasoning and logic, and above all you need a single main point in your introduction that is then substantiated and defended in the body of your paper. Please make your paper as professional as possible, with citations, cover page, etc.Answer ONE of the questions below.What ought to be the proper role of Congress in Strategic Intelligence? Is there a proper role in oversight of strategic intelligence activities, in ensuring that the policy expressed in budget and appropriations laws is being followed, in ensuring that the will of the people and the necessity of national security is being carried out properly by the executive branch of government?OR:Describe and explain the Church Committee hearings in the 1970s. What impact did it have on the U.S. Intelligence Community? If you choose this topic, here is one reference to consider: Schwarz, Frederick A. O. 2007. “The Church Committee and a New Era of Intelligence Oversight.” Intelligence and National Security 22 (2): 270-97. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1080/02684520701303881 OR:Congressional investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election created significant issues and controversies. House and Senate investigations seemed to come to different conclusions. Develop and analyze the main issues with these investigations, what went wrong, and what can be done to improve such oversight activities of the IC in the future. Also, please review the attached literacy information tools to help with your research and writing of this paper. Please follow the below requirements:General Requirements1. Document Format.a. MS Word documentb. One-inch (1”) margins (double-spaced)c. Times New Roman Fontd. Twelve (12) pitch2. Citation Format: The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017 available online at: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html The Author-Date system is recommended.3. Graphics are allowed and encouraged (but they don’t count on length).4. Students must (1) employ imaginative approaches to answer the question being asked; (2) display an impressive command of the subject matter beyond the immediately obvious; (3) demonstrate a high level of critical thinking and reflecting on current and world views, and genuine intellectual development; and (4) excel in explaining all major points using multiple examples from the course readings or individual research.

organization and community of dogism created by our group which is used to encourage the protection of dog and gathering of people who love dog. The paper needs to describe the component, fitness, comparison with current religion and globalization of dogism organization and community.

Citing to and elaborating upon three cases we’ve studied and discussed during the course from the Case List provided on the day and time of the exam (Thursday, May 14 at 1-2pm), and strictly following the Rules for Writing, make as strong an argument as you can in the form of a persuasive essay in which you AGREE OR DISAGREE with the statement below. Your essay will be proportionally graded on how well you formulate the issue in each case you select, how well you summarize the rule and reasoning supporting the rule and any relevant exceptions to the rule in each case you select, how well you lay out the court’s analysis in each case you select, how well you state the conclusion of the court in each case you select and how well you have used each case you select to support your argument, pro or con. Judges should always favor the principle of grantor sovereignty (carrying out the grantor’s intent) over free alienability (making sure the property is marketable and free from unreasonable restraints on alienability) in deciding property rights cases. cases Pierson v. Post Popov v. Hayashi Moore v. Regents Intel Corporation v. Hamidi Graduate Johnson v. McIntosh Graduate Howard v. Kunto Graduate Gruen v. Gruen Graduate Cole v. Steinlauf Moore v. Phillips Murphy v. Financial Development Corporation Duncan v. Vassaur State ex rel. Thornton v. Hay Neponsit Property Owners’ Ass’n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank Sanborn v. McLean Shelley v Kraemer Boomer v. Atlantic Spur and Prah Euclid v. Ambler Kelo v. City of New Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon Penn Central Station v. New York City Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Commission Commonwealth Building Corp. v. Hirschfield Blackett v. Olanoff Javins v. First National Realty Co. Walls v. Oxford Management Co. Problem of the Day Foundation Development Corporation v. Loehmann’s Inc. Merchants Row Corp. v. Merchants Row Inc. quarian Foundation v Sholom House

Discuss Race in social justice system.