Discuss how the past informs the present in relation to the following issues: Nurses practicing to the full extent of their education and experiences (Institute of Medicine Report – Future of Nursing)Diversity in gender, race, and class in the nursing profession
Explore the operation and supply chain of an organisation and a specific product or service of your choice.
What is (at least) one major difference between quantitative and qualitative approaches?What types of research questions are better studied using quantitative approaches and what types are better studied with qualitative approaches?Good research convinces us that something is true. Discuss why researchers often build their arguments using BOTH correlational evidence (showing an IV and DV co-vary across cases) and process-tracing evidence (showing the logical sequence of events by which changes in an IV cause changes in a DV).
1: What is the role of the artist today?Discussion 2: Is this a pipe? Why or Why not? :(I will attach the picture)Discussion 3: Yoko Ono, Dollar Piece (1963), Pick a dollar amount. A. List all the things you can buy with that amount. B. List all the things you cannot buy with that amount.Discussion 4: How do you think digital media will impact art?
Dawkins represents Paley’s type of reasoning in his analogy with the Boeing 747 created by Junkyard assembled randomly by a hurricane. Explains Paley’s Watchmaker argument. Explains Dawkins Boeing 747 argument and explain why you favor Paley or Dawking.N.B I favor Paley’s argument.
An essay on how the CoronaVirus is impacting and has impacted college sports and the NCAA. How will the recruiting be affected for all sports. How will coaches salaries be affected. How will Universities athletic budgets be affected. Also does the NCAA have a competitive advantage and future strategy with the Coronavirus. Talk about what sports were like in 2019 before the CoronaVirus outbreak, what it was in 2020 as the CoronaVirus was just hitting in the U.S., what it is going to be like in 2021 in the future.
Case Study 2: National Collegiate Athletic Association Ethics and Compliance ProgramDue Week 6 and worth 200 pointsRead “Case Study 6: National Collegiate Athletic Association Ethics and Compliance Program,” located on page 444 of the textbook.Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you: Determine the fundamental ways in which the NCAA’s ethics program failed to prevent the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Alaska. Support your response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals. Examine the principal ways in which the leadership of the NCAA contributed to the ethical violations of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Alaska. Support your response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals. Predict the key differences in the scenarios that occurred at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Alaska if an effective ethics program was in place. Provide a rationale for your response. Postulate on two (2) actions that the NCAA leadership should take in order to regain the trust and confidence of students and stakeholders. Recommend two (2) measures that the HR departments of colleges and universities should take to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Provide a rationale for your response. Go to https://research.strayer.edu to locate at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Describe the business ethics issues and definitions, theories, and frameworks important to organizational ethical decision making and the role of a human resource professional. Determine the role of stakeholder interests, the interrelationship of ethics and social responsibility, and the role of corporate governance in ethics. Analyze scenarios to determine the ethical character of decisions made and the related impact on the organization. Write clearly and concisely about issues in ethics and advocacy for HR professionals using correct grammar and mechanics. Use technology and information resources to research issues in business ethics and advocacy for HR professionals.Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, the logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.
The Gorgias is a Platonic dialogue dealing with the relationship between rhetoric and philosophy.Your task is to answer a deceptively simple question:What do you take to be the relationship between rhetoric (communicating to persuade) and philosophy (communicating to tell the truth) in the Gorgias? What should the relationship be in actual practice?
Write a research papeon Genetic and biological determinants of disease and the health profession response.
It’s a texual analysis. Analyse, compare and contrast the following two texts. Include comments on the similarities and differences between the texts and the significance of context, audience, purpose, and formal and stylistic features.From Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion (Court Opinion by William J. Brennan) &American Flag Stands for Tolerance (Newspaper Editorial by Ronald J. Allen)
