Category: Essay Help

B.1. Explain how each of the following affects the bid-rent function/size of the city. •Increase P •Increase w •Increase k •Increase t •Increase a See Figure 1 B.2. According to Census Journey to Work data, which three counties are top destinations for commuters from Santa Clara County – not including Santa Clara County? Please list in order and list the estimated commuters based on 2011-2015 5-Year ACS Commuting Flows. B.3. Describe two kinds of scale economies. What different implications do the two kinds of scale economies have for regional economic development? PART C: Answer question C.1. This part is worth 55% of the exam. will be a longer essay. Answers in this part will range in length between five to seven paragraphs. C.1. Describe the central economic concept you addressed in your term project and what insight it gave you on the basic policy issue addressed in the reading you reported on.

Summarize the poem “God Says Yes To Me” and discuss how does this resonate with your own life?

From your selected health promotion topic from week one; what are the genetic implications for your Healthy People2020 Objective? What role do you as a nurse have in genetic assessments related to the implications identified above? Name two specific health education needs for individuals concerning genetic influences and your chosen Healthy People 2020 Objective.

“Is Torvald Helmer a tyrant or a victim or something else? Is he the play’s antagonist or not? How does Ibsen reveal his traits in the play, where, and why? How does Torvald contribute to Nora’s story? Does he develop and change or not? How does Ibsen intend us to react to him. Make two lists of Torvald’s positive and negative traits. Then locate play passages that illustrate these traits. Is Ibsen using him to comment on marriage or society as well?”. There are five sources that must be used, which include: one from the play itself, one from one of these sources 1. (“Bentley, Eric. “Ibsen: Pro and Con.”)2. (Hemmer, Bjorn. “Freedom, Truth, and Society—Rhetoric and Reality.”)3. (Tysdahl, Bjørn. “Ibsen: The Significance of Swear-Words.”Ibsen Studies.), and the last three sources from any of these 1. (Brooks, Daniel J. “Infection: The Motivating Factor Behind Nora’s Flight in A DOLL HOUSE.”Explicator.)2. (Hartmann, Ellen. “Ibsen’s Motherless Women.”Ibsen Studies.)3. (Shideler, Ross.”Ibsen and the name-of-the-father.”Scandinavian Studies.)4. (Templeton, Joan. “Ibsen’s Feminist Characters.” From “The Doll House Backlash: Criticism, Feminism, and Ibsen.”)5. (Wang, Quan. “Before Marriage, Within Marriage, and After Marriage—Kristine Linde in A DOLL HOUSE.”Explicator.)6. (Witham, Barry, and John Lutterbie. From “A Marxist Approach to A Doll House.”)

You might want to argue, for example, that Leonardo DiCaprio is a good actor, but would any reasonable person disagree? Probably not. The man has an Oscar! Tom Cruise, on the other hand? Now that’s debatable. Whatever your subject, you must assert yourself by making a strong claim about its value or success. This claim will drive your thesis sentence. Your next step will be to come up with valid criteria for your evaluation. These are fair and appropriate standards for judging your subject, and they should go beyond the obvious. When people think about what makes a good breakfast, for example, usually they think of nutrition. That’s one good criterion, but don’t we also judge breakfasts on taste, convenience, and price? If so, then those are all necessary criteria. These criteria should give you a good outline for your argument. You must now prove that your subject does (or does not) adequately fulfill the criteria. That means using strong rhetorical techniques to support your ideas. The best arguments will use a variety of techniques from all three appeals to support each criterion: • Provide good evidence through data, facts, examples, and reasoning (logos). • Show you’re trustworthy through personal expertise, quotes from experts, research, and respect for the opposition (ethos). • Make it interesting with stories, vivid imagery, or humor (pathos). You should imagine your argument is an opinion column in the The Daily Barometer. While you will need to remain professional, you might also consider the content and style that would appeal to your audience: other students at OSU. Use your knowledge of this audience’s values and interests to craft the most convincing argument you can. Please see the next page for guidance on choosing a topic. Evaluation Topics Fruitful Places to Check • Controversies in the news: Issues of evaluation are often embedded in them • Your area of study: Most disciplines are always pushing their boundaries into new areas that evoke evaluative disagreements • Other areas that interest you: You might already know the evaluative controversies within them Other Potential Areas for Topic Ideas The point is not to evaluate an entire area but to search the area for a specific subject to evaluate—i.e., Tom Cruise as an actor, not entertainment as a whole. 1. Campus Life 2. Education & Career 3. Entertainment & Music 4. Art & Literature 5. Food & Health 6. Sports & Games 7. Politicians & Laws 8. Science & Conservation 9. Products & Technology 10. Whatever won or didn’t win your favorite award • Bob Dylan got the Nobel Prize in Literature? What a joke! Don’t Do This: Common Problems Don’t choose a subject that’s overly broad. It will be hard to argue that action stars are good or bad actors, or that breakfast is a good or bad meal. There are too many action stars and breakfasts to adequately cover them all. Instead, choose one action star (i.e., Tom Cruise) or one breakfast (i.e., plain oatmeal) to evaluate. Don’t write a proposal. That is, don’t argue what readers should do about it, such as eating more oatmeal or watching more art house cinema. If you advocate for action, you’ll write a different kind of argument that won’t meet the standards for this essay. (This applies to the topic only, not the conclusion or other parts of the essay.) Don’t use criteria that are unfair, such as “winning Academy Awards.” Can’t an actor be good even if they haven’t won this award? Better to figure out why actors win Academy Awards and use that as your criteria. In fact, that’s exactly what the Academy does to distribute its awards! (Awards, however, might support the idea that your subject meets a criterion, such as being respected by colleagues.)

For your Unit 2 assignment, you identified a community (city, county, et cetera) budget to use for your course assignments. It is important to note that if your score on the Unit 2 assignment was reduced because the budget was not suitable in terms of detail, using the same budget in this assignment will increase the probability of significant grade reductions. This assignment requires access to a comprehensive budget document.In this assignment, the focus is on the city or county budget, not the budget of the individual departments. If you are working with a nonprofit agency or special task district, your focus will be solely on that entity. Complete the following for this assignment, focusing on the city or county budget, not the budget of the individual department.Identify the types of revenue present, evaluating them in terms of sufficiency and sustainability.Evaluate the capacity of the budget process to identify and integrate the needs and expectations of the community.Recall the media piece Riverbend City: Public Opinion and Priorities you completed in Unit 3. This piece provides insight into one means for gathering community input and identifying budgeting priorities.Evaluate the budget creation process in relation to identified best practices.Evaluate the formal process for monitoring and evaluating the budget in relation to identified best practices.Recommend a minimum of five strategies for improving the budget process for the community, framing the recommendations on identified best practices.

Write a case study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative.

Write a research paper on “She’s Come Undone” book by Wally Lamb.

•Action: “we should do X” •Cause & Effect: “X causes/caused/is causing Y” •Compare & Contrast: “X is better than Y because…” •Definition: “Is X an/like an A a/like a B?” Research Requirements – 8 sources minimum •Four of the sources (regardless of where they come from—internet, database, scholarly source, etc.) may be the same as the ones from the annotated bib. All other sources must be printed out and marked for quotes •One must be a new scholarly source from the JSTOR or Academic Search Complete databases (note: all sources in JSTOR are scholarly – only some sources in ASC are scholarly, so be careful and check with me if you are unsure at ALL). •One can be either any scholarly source or a long-form journalism piece from any source. •Additional sources are fine as long as they are reliable sources. What kinds of sources are okay to use? Unacceptable internet sources include Wikipedia or any wiki; Ehow, About.com, Howstuffworks or other linkbait/content farm sources; Britannica or encyclopedias, dictionaries, or basic reference books; Enotes, Sparknotes, or any other “study guide” sites; any sites providing sample essays or reference lists for common essay topics; and personal blogs or personal websites (except those run by someone who is an acknowledged expert in his/her field). Unacceptable internet sources will be counted as a missing source. Acceptable internet sources include advocacy group websites (note they will take a side and have a bias); government websites (.gov); large news organization websites such as CNN, Reuters, Associated Press, BBC, ABC/NBC/CBS (not Fox or HuffPo); newspapers of record such as Washington Post, New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal; major print magazines such as Time, Newsweek, Wired, Discover, Harper’s, Atlantic Monthly, National Geographic, etc. (avoid fashion, decorating, regional, and celebrity magazines, as their articles are usually too short); and professional blogs with editors (Gawker.com sites, TheAwl.com sites, The Rumpus, etc.; blogs run by newspapers or magazines; blogs written by experts in a field). Unacceptable book sources include anything in a “for dummies” or “for idiots” series; Cliffs Notes or any other study guide text; encyclopedias , dictionaries and other basic reference texts; or any “What are the Issues?” and/or “Exploring the Issues” types of texts that collects a number of (basic) sources on a controversial topic under one cover for the use of students. The following terms are used throughout this guide to refer to specific writing and research concepts. Please refer to this sheet if there are any questions throughout the research process. Bibliographic Information: the address for your source. ideas found in a source and writing them with the original text. Quotations must be surrounded by quotation marks. Revising: the process of changing the structure and ideas in a paper. Thesis: the articulated point of your essay. The thesis expresses your opinion about the topic and states what your essay is seeking to prove. Topic Sentence: a sentence that clearly defines the point of a specific paragraph. Each body paragraph needs to begin with a topic sentence. The topic sentence relates directly to and supports the thesis statement. Transitional Sentence: a sentence that helps bring a paragraph to a close and then leads the reader into the next paragraph. •What are the author’s education and experience? Look for information about the author in the publication itself. •Who is the audience for the publication (scholarly or general)? •Is the publication primary or secondary in nature? •Does it provide general background information or in-depth information on a specific topic? Which do you need? •How extensive is the bibliography? Can you use these references to find more information?

Write a paper discussing the barriers working and breastfeeding mothers face.