Category: Essay Help

What is Philosophy?

Montreaux Chocolate USA: Are Americans Ready for Healthy Dark Chocolate?

(Please note:  This case is comprised of two parts,.  Please be sure to address questions related to both parts separately in your paper.  This can be designated through the use of headings/subheadings, such as Responses to Part 1; Responses to Part 2): **Be sure to read and follow the instructions outlined below, as well as the additional instructions listed for this assignment in the course syllabus. MSM 6633 Writing Assignment Case Part 1 Karen, the New Manager Introduction: Karen was recently promoted to a first level supervisor from her team leader position. Karen was promoted into a position in which she would manage coders, engineers, systems developers and a clerk. In all, the group numbers 14 plus the clerks. Karen was looking forward to this opportunity. Although she was used to working with programmers and systems engineers in a software development company, this would be her first opportunity to work as an “official” manager. Helpful Background/Case Information: The mission of the organization (and Karen’s software team):  We provide quality software solutions to improve the performance of our customers. Organizational goals:  1) To lead industry standards for high quality software  2) To interact effectively with our customers and with each other, focusing on strong working relationships and effective communication  3) To have the right people in the right places at the right time for effective processes, procedures and outcomes  4) To be ethical in all of our transactions The composition of Karen’s team, even before she started, was one of skilled individuals who are brought in to do specific functions; this is common in software development where people have different roles/specializations. Typically, these roles are not interchangeable, however, people do often learn about the other functions and are able to some extent to help people in other roles to a small extent. The culture Karen has started to build includes more collaboration, friendlier working relationships and improved information exchanges so people have a better sense of what is going on throughout the organization in terms of work, deadlines, and progress – none of this was available before because everybody worked as an individual with no overlap. Her team members have appreciated the changes and like their one-on-one sessions where they can voice opinions and make suggestions, and have found Karen is more than willing to implement their suggestions whenever possible, and she allows the team input into decision making as often as she can. Morale has improved somewhat as has job satisfaction since Karen took over the team. Case-Part 1: Karen was anxious about her first day at work, because she had worked for this company for 10 years but was moving into a new department and didn’t know anyone in her new group very well. She had a nodding acquaintance with some of the members as she passed them at the water fountain, going to lunch and getting coffee, but knew that she had to effectively start over in some areas and establish herself and her leadership. She knew from casual conversation with other employees that there were issues with morale and job satisfaction, partly because of the lack of trust with the previous supervisor. One of the concerns that she had prior to her promotion and based on the company grapevine was that the previous supervisor of her new team had moved on because of something that happened in the group. Employees who knew about an event that had precipitated the departure of the supervisor were few, and there were multiple stories circulating about why the previous supervisor left. However, Karen understood that information from the grapevine can be unreliable, so she will wait to see if this is an issue. Once she became the supervisor, one of Karen’s concerns was that the majority of the group consisted of people her age (40) or older. While the clerks are in their 20s, everyone else was over 40, except for the four employees brought in recently. She knew she was looking at employees with different priorities, because they were at different places in their careers. The group was also somewhat diverse, and this included an even mix of men and women. Most were US citizens, and the rest had lived in the US for many years. More recent two arrivals included a man and a woman from India, and one arrival from the UK and another from China, both of whom were men who had been brought in on visas for specialized work within the last year. In the first two weeks, Karen held one-on-one discussions with each team member so she could get to know each of one and ask them about what each person felt the team did well and what areas needed improvement. This helped her focus on each employee’s specific skills and areas in which they could contribute as well as giving her a full picture of problem areas. She felt positive this was the right approach after the interviews. However, when asked in a meeting, nobody was aware of the company mission. While some of the team members knew there was a company mission, they didn’t know what it was. Karen established weekly team meetings and noticed the first week there was little conversation between the team members. She attributed this to the fact that she was new, and they had to get to know her. When this continued in weeks two, three and four, Karen decided there was something else going on, because she had no sense of “team” from the members or that they supported each other based on the conversations in the team meetings. Not only this, team members appeared to have little understanding of how their work fit into the “big picture” of the company and even less information about how their projects contributed to the company goals. Now, foremost in Karen’s mind, is the need to improve collaboration and cohesion and to develop a team that is capable of performing at high levels because of the contracts and deadlines looming within the next 12 months. Part of this task includes the need to share information about how the team supports organizational goals. As a result, she is determined to make sure team members understand their roles in the company’s success. She is also intent on building trust and cohesion, both of which will enhance morale and job satisfaction according to some of the articles that she has read. She wants to lay out a plan to help coach her employees into becoming a high performing team. Karen will begin with information about the mission and the goals followed by a focus on developing trust and cohesion. Karen wonders how she is going to accomplish all of this without sacrificing productivity. Writing Assignment Part 1: Assume you are Karen. Your assignment is to develop a plan to present to your manager to improve the team’s performance.  1. Identify and describe (in detail) 3 to 5 major issues with the team that you think might be adversely impacting the overall performance of the group. 2. Develop and describe (in detail) a specific strategy you would utilize to address each of the 3-5 major issues you’ve identified. These strategies should specifically address how you would plan to develop trust and cohesion IMPORTANT NOTE: In completing this section of the writing assignment, you should use information from course materials including, but not limited to, text, articles, and videos as they relate to trust and cohesion, and check the Library Guide for reading, or look in the library for other articles. What else was mentioned that needs to be included in your plans/activities?   MSM 6633 Writing Assignment Case-Part 2 Karen, the New Supervisor Karen proposed her plan for teambuilding approximately six months ago and her manager approved the entire plan, allowing the equivalent of eight hours (one workday) once a month for the activities detailed in the plan for a maximum of six days. She implemented her plan about four months ago, after arranging the necessary time off from work, meeting with an internal consultant from Human Resources, developing goals, reviewing the content of the teambuilding sessions and deciding how to measure outcomes. So far she has used three days for teambuilding. For each day of teambuilding, Karen has used a simple questionnaire that everybody completes, it consists of three questions which focus specifically on the activities for that day. Those three questions are: 1. What went well? 2. What could be improved? 3. What else should be included? She decided to use the questionnaires for the training days so she would have a record of what everybody said, even though she does not request they put their names on the one-page form. After three training days she has received mostly positive comments related to getting to know other people better. Karen has also observed that this is reflected in the workplace behaviors, as her team members do interact more, ask questions of each other and offer solutions. Karen has also noticed that the team members will discuss the results that are posted on the walls and they check these at least once a week, and these results come up in the weekly team meetings as part of the normal conversation. Team members started to help each other meet deadlines so the charge would reflect positive progress for the entire group; she felt this was a positive step in the right direction for the team. One of the contracts assigned to the team was completed after the second teambuilding day. Karen requested feedback from the business unit that received the product which consisted of the same three questions she used for the teambuilding sessions, as well as confirmation that the delivery date was met and the product was working as required. For this particular contract, the actual delivery date missed the due date requested by two days but this was not a problem for the customer because their internal dates had changed due to requirements beyond their control. As a result, the feedback was mostly positive with a note about the missed due date. Karen is very encouraged by this, as this is one of the first measures received since she has been the supervisor and it is the first time any measure has been taken to evaluate customer satisfaction. Karen decides that she is going to use a survey she found on the Internet that evaluates team effectiveness at the halfway point in the teambuilding sessions. This means she will hand out the survey (team members do not have to sign their names) before the next teambuilding day which will be day four. She also plans to hand out this survey after they have completed all six of the teambuilding days and then compare the results. Along with this information, the feedback from the customers and her training feedback (three questions), Karen believes she has adequate information to assess team performance. With this performance information she can more accurately determine if other training is needed, if other areas need attention, and she has a way to track performance improvement for her team by using these measures as well as the weekly charts the clerks post on the walls. The results for the Team Effectiveness questionnaire are tabulated by clerk, and Karen sees that although many of the areas are either positive or close to positive, she notices that there may be some weaknesses around areas A, F and G, with one weak item in C; she is determined to find out specifically what the issues might be in this area so she can support the team to make improvements. All of the team member responses were grouped around certain areas, there were no ‘outliers’. As a result, Karen told the clerk to consolidate all of the information into the completed Team Effectiveness Survey so the areas could be easily identified and shared with the team. In this way the team can provide discussion and input into the content of the teambuilding sessions before they are completed and the survey is distributed again. Team Effectiveness Survey Results for Writing Assignment.docx Writing Assignment Part 2: Using the information from Part 1 as necessary, analyze the survey data (attached) and determine what needs to be addressed in the three remaining teambuilding sessions. Support your analysis with information provided in the case. 1. Based on the Team Effectiveness survey data (attached), present and support an analysis of what the team’s strengths are and where improvements can be made. Use the data provided on the completed Team Effectiveness Survey, (summary data is provided below). Justify why you feel that these issues or areas in need of improvement should be priorities for the team. (Note: Please focus on the root causes of issues in the team and not on symptoms. A focus on symptoms will not address the basic problems). 2. Based on the course information (text, videos, articles), propose a specific strategy or method (in detail) you would use in addressing each of priorities for improvement you’ve identified. In your response, please include rationale or justification for why you feel that each of the strategies you’ve identified will be effective. 3. Organizations and senior leadership have a responsibility to support and encourage team leaders in their respective roles in an effort to promote effective team performance. In this specific case, identify 2 or 3 specific things the organization or Karen’s direct leader/supervisor could have done to support Karen in her role as a new team leader. Please justify each of these suggestions by supporting why or how you think each could have been valuable to Karen and the overall performance of the team. IMPORTANT NOTE: In completing this section of the writing assignment, you should use information from course materials including, but not limited to, text, articles, and videos as they relate to trust and cohesion, and check the Library Guide for reading, or look in the library for other articles. What else was mentioned that needs to be included in your plans/activities? General Information to keep in mind: When working with teams, there is no “silver bullet” answer or one right way to do everything, because it depends on the leadership, the employees, the situation, and even what has happened in the past. This is why, when a plan is developed, we need to consider the literature, prior experiences, and the experiences/wisdom of others. We also need to consider the given situation as well as the culture of the organization, the style of the group leader and the culture of the team. For example, what appears to be a great idea may not fit with the style of the team leader or with the culture of the group or organization. Team Effectiveness Survey Results for Writing Assignment.docx

Read the assigned article, essay, or text section and then take a moment to think about what you’ve read. In 400 words or more, express your thoughts and response to the reading. This response should be an exercise in critical-thinking about the text. Direction: write 400 words exactly or more.  And please include Include at least “1 Direct Quote” from the reading. You may choose any Quote that stood out to you and emphasize on it through the reading or just express your thoughts and response to the reading in your own words. What did you think of it? Why is it significant? Did you agree or disagree with the message(s) found in it? Why? What was the message or purpose of this reading? Do you see any connections between this reading and other readings and/or your portfolio topic (or potential topics)?   Note! at the end of the Essay, please conclude and include this sentence, please write “that this reading had a connection to my portfolio/topic. That this reading is also relevant today as my topic is also relevant today which is Technology and Technology strives man kind to keep working and keep moving forward”.   Notes:  Please Do not Forget to include “1 Direct Quote” from the reading” and  Do not Forget to include to add my sentence i wrote above that you must add to the end of the essay.   And No Do Not Forget to include “Work  Cited” page   Also I will provided the file in Word file that has the reading material, just be aware “both files are the same”.  I provided 2 files incase the link is broken for the reading. you may use any file i provided.

This assignment consists of both an interview and a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation. Assessment/Interview Select a community of interest in your region. Perform a physical assessment of the community. 1.     Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.” 2.     Interview a community health and public health provider regarding that person’s role and experiences within the community. Interview Guidelines Interviews can take place by phone, or by Skype. Develop interview questions to gather information about the role of the provider in the community and the health issues faced by the chosen community. Compile key findings from the interview, including the interview questions used, and submit these with the presentation. PowerPoint Presentation Create a PowerPoint presentation of 15-20 slides (slide count does not include title and references slide) describing the chosen community interest. Include the following in your presentation: 1.     Description of community and community boundaries: the people and the geographic, geopolitical, financial, educational level; ethnic and phenomenological features of the community, as well as types of social interactions; common goals and interests; and barriers, and challenges, including any identified social determinates of health. 2.     Summary of community assessment: (a) funding sources and (b) partnerships. 3.     Summary of interview with community health/public health provider. 4.     Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion. 5.     A conclusion summarizing your key findings and a discussion of your impressions of the general health of the community.

Explore several websites related to prenatal health education and complete the following:  1. Provide the web address of one website that would be useful to you if you were preparing an educational program for expectant couples. Please be certain that it is a reputable site such as March of Dimes, CDC, NIH/other federal government site, or academic medical center.  2. Describe the main focus or purpose of the information that is provided on this website.  3. Explain why you believe the information provided on this website is based on science and not just on “opinion”.  4. Give three reasons why you believe the information provided would be helpful in preparing an educational program for expectant parents.

As a leader in your nursing department, you must review the registered nurse practice act for the state in which you work—the guideline for each nurse who works in that state.  Part 1: Locate your own state’s nurse practice act, and summarize it. In your own words, post what the act says about the nurses’ responsibility when delegating care to unlicensed assistive personnel.  What does the delegation language mean to you in regard to your own delegation of care to unlicensed assistive personnel? Part 2: Describe a change that recently occurred in your workplace. What resources were used to implement the change? How did the staff react? From your perspective, what steps could the leadership team have taken to better implement the change?

Directly reflect on the  following from this week’s readings.  A short link is provided with helpful details.   Link  (Links to an external site.) Minimize Video “The overthrow of the shah of Iran in 1979 resulted in the loss of an important Western ally in the region, though the ensuing militant Islamic government was hostile to both superpowers.”    Describe the impact of this event to international relations, how you think it affects the world order to this day and what should be done with the current Iranian regime – take a British, Russian or Chinese perspective and not American when responding.   Identify drivers from your country and what type of relationship you want with Iran.  Would this antagonize the West?  How would you mitigate?  Are your ideas currently found in the world right now? Remember the goal is not to create form papers but insightful, personally observant and creative ponderings about world events, how the world works or some other angle you found in your journey that week.  Each paper is to be 3-4 pages long with a minimum of 3 outside sources. READING ATTACHED Previous Next

Part One Winnicott described “early processes” including integration, personalization, and realization. Which of these do you believe to be the most significant? Why? (250 words with reference)   Part Two Watts and Erguner-Tekinalp (2017) discussed how several Neo-Freudian approaches have been influenced by Alfred Adler’s theory. Does this rise of positive psychology signal the beginning of the decline of psychoanalytic theory? Why or why not? (250 words with reference)

What caused the Salem witch trials? In the readings, you will have seen several theories: genuine religious beliefs, interpersonal and financial disputes among the people living in Salem Town and Salem Village, medical disorders, ergot poisoning, Puritan beliefs about women, violent battles between the colonists and Native Americans, etc. Write 2 pages on which of these explanations you believe is the most persuasive. Cite sources from the course to support your argument. In 1692, several young girls became mysteriously ill, appearing to suffer from seizures and claiming to see ghostly specters pinching and prodding them. Soon, the girls began to accuse neighbors of using witchcraft to harm them. Over the next year, nearly 200 people in Salem would be accused of witch craft, and 19 would be executed for the crime. In this unit, you will see primary and secondary sources related to the Salem witch trials. If these terms are not familiar, read this guide and watch this video on primary and secondary sources and how to approach them. Begin with the link labeled “Tituba” below. Tituba was an enslaved Caribbean woman working in the household of Salem’s resident preacher and was among the first to be accused of witchcraft.  After this, you may read in any order you like. The “overview” document will give you a general outline of the events at Salem and some of the theories that have been put forward about what happened and why. As you read each document on Perusall (clicking the links will open a new window that will take you to our course’s Perusall site), you will see comments from me that will add context to the readings and provide links to additional readings that may interest you.  As you read, keep in mind that you will write a 2-page paper at the end of the unit on why you think the Salem witch trials happened. Throughout the readings, you will see explanations ranging from religion to ergot poisoning to financial disputes between the townspeople, and so on. It may be helpful to annotate the readings on Perusall whenever you encounter a new explanation. You may then refer back to these annotations as you are writing your paper.  Once you have turned in your paper to the eLearn dropbox linked below, we will schedule a Zoom call to discuss the unit and your perspectives.