Category: Essay Help

In this assignment, you will utilize the techniques practiced to source five scholarly sources for literature review. Research Topic would be: How the Coronavirus impacted students’ motivation for success while using technology. In addition, you will provide a two-paragraph discussion of any challenges or barriers you faced in the selection of these five relevant sources. For example, did you find few peer-reviewed articles for the keywords and phrases used, or did you find it challenging to narrow the sources returned in your searches? Was it a challenge to five sources that related to specific research studies?

John Locke’s life and contribution to American enlightenment. How did he influence society and how does it affect us as Americans today. How can we see Locke’s argument with out current global crisis?

Written AssignmentInstructions: Answer the following questions in essays that comprehensively discuss the issues raised by each question. Your answers should be written with correct punctuation, grammar, and citations. Your answers also should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate your knowledge of the topics raised by the question. To formulate your responses be sure to utilize your text and research at least two other sources for additional insight and assistance in creating real-world scenarios where applicable.Leadership and Organizational ConflictDiscuss Fiedler’s original Model of Leadership and then compare this with his later development of Cognitive Resource Theory.What type of leader characteristic (more intelligent versus more experienced) is most suited for high-stress incidents? What type of leader (more intelligent versus more experienced) is best suited for low-stress, planned incidents? When giving your answers provide a detailed example of a police leadership position that would fit the leadership style of a more intelligent leader and a more experienced leader.Next, in your own words, define, discuss, and provide a scenario in a criminal justice organization of Transactional Leadership, Transformational Leadership, and Visionary Leadership.Compare and contrast the Traditional View, the Human Relations View, and the Interactionist View of organizational conflict.Provide an example of a criminal justice agency in the midst of functional conflict.

Beginning on page 909 of the Finnemore and Sikkink (1998) reading, they discuss the conflicts and potential linkages between the study of norms and, broadly and somewhat roughly speaking, rational-choice theory (they use the world “rationality”), which has been the basis of most political science thought over the last 50 or so years. They identify four issues that have created the most conflict between “norms scholars” and rational-choice scholars: materialism, utilitarianism, choice, and persuasion.I find their observations and arguments about utility maximization and choice to be the particularly interesting and convincing. First, by utility maximization, they simply mean a circumstance in which an actor pursues the course of action that they determine to be most likely to get them the most of what they want, i.e. rational behavior; here, the implicit, albeit somewhat straw-man, rational-choice argument is that actors will only construct and adhere to norms if it helps them to “get what they want.” I think that it’s pretty easy to view this logic through a realist or liberal lens: actors (i.e. states) will construct norms and adhere to norms out of self interest if doing so is the most efficient way to get the most of what they want. On the other hand, a constructivist perspective might suggest that states don’t necessarily create and adhere to “logics of appropriateness” out of material conceptions of self-interested utility maximization, but, rather, that “actors internalize roles and rules as scripts to which they conform, not for instrumental reasons–to get what they want–but because they understand the behavior to be good, desirable, and appropriate. Habit, duty, sense of obligation and responsibility, as well as principled belief may all be powerful motivators for people and underpin significant episodes of world politics” (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998, 912). ***This raises the first set of issues that we’ll discuss. First, do you think that international actors (here, primarily states) construct and adhere to norms for entirely instrumental reasons, i.e. to get what they want? Second, is it possible that, if international actors do in fact adhere to norms because they understand the resulting “behavior to be good, desirable, and appropriate” that they are nonetheless behaving in accordance with good old fashioned rational-choice utility maximization? Put another way, is it possible that states sometimes derive utility from behaving in “good” and “appropriate” ways as the end themselves, as opposed to using that behavior as a means to some other utility-maximizing end, say, adhering to a norm that a great power created in order to curry favor from that power? Most importantly, why or why not? Furthermore, on page 913. The authors cite research that argues that “When norms become internalized in actors, actors are no longer choosing to conform to them in any meaningful way…Yet, as we survey the norms research that emphasizes appropriateness logic in IR, very little of it looks deterministic. Indeed, most [of this research] emphasizes the highly contingent and contested nature of normative change and normative influence” (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998, 913-914). ***This raises the second set of issues that we’ll discuss. First, do you think that norms do in fact become internalized, meaning that they develop a taken-for-granted character and are no longer subject to debate? If not, how do we explain norms like slavery, or perhaps (though I’m on the fence as to whether this norm is fully internalized) the norm against using chemical weapons against one’s own citizens; if you do think that norms become internalized, do you think that these norms become deterministic, meaning that actors don’t exercise any decision-making behavior when adhering to them, i.e. that adherence is a fait accompli? These are really difficult, highly abstract questions, but they also lend themselves very well to carefully ordered, logical thinking, which is one of the most important skills that studying the liberal arts helps us to develop. Given that, I’m especially interested in hearing what you all have to say about this! 100 words minimum

In an essay, create an argument that explains which of the two Cinderella texts, Grimms’ or Perrault’s, Susan Douglas would refuse to read to her daughter. In creating this essay, you will need to FOCUS on her THEORIES from her article, and you will need to be able to *partially quote* from these theories and apply them to the Cinderella text you have chosen to discuss or critique.htmlhttps://www.pitt.edu/~dash/perrault06.htmlYou should avoid lots of summary of Cinderella because we’ve all read Cinderella. Instead, think of the necessary background and context your reader will need to understand how the arguments of Douglas show one tale to be particularly bad when considered via her theories. Organize the paper by your points of your argument, *NOT* chronologically through the tale. This will help you group your evidence by points instead of by scene.You might benefit from using the MEAL paragraph development plan in your body paragraphs (Main idea to start, Evidence and Analysis of this idea, and some manner of Linking your point to the thesis found here: https://twp.duke.edu/sites/twp.duke.edu/files/file-attachments/meal-plan.original.pdf).Each point will need specific proof from both texts to satisfy the reader, and you should be ready to explain in detail how Douglas’s ideas about advertisements apply to folk tales from before the Industrial Revolution.Specifically, you should be able to demonstrate working knowledge several aspects of Douglas’s text: Of how narcissism and liberation works in her article, how advertisers are using feminist goals against women’s liberation, how achievement has been modified by advertisers to mean something different for women, how the catfight among women works, how unrealistic ideals keep women focused on less useful concepts of success, etc. Whatever you use from her article, you are responsible for explaining and connecting to the tale.

Critically discuss how organisational performance is measured at the different levels of the organisation.

Why it is important to invest money while a person is at a young age versus investing at an older age?

In the Week 1 discussion forum you had an opportunity to present a potential problem and an innovative solution specific to your role specialization. In addition, you have reviewed the literature to identify qualitative and quantitative research articles and submitted annotated bibliographies to provide evidence supporting the problem.

Considering the feedback provided to you by the faculty member it is now time to prepare your problem statement, research purpose, and research question.

First share your refined problem and proposed solution (given your review of literature this may have changed depending on the evidence you were able to provide). Next, follow the steps to help define your research question.

Craft the problem statement and research purpose.
Design your research question aimed at solving (a part of) the problem and include the following components which will focus the literature review.
PICOT Question:
Patient, Population or Problem

What are the characteristics of the patient or population?
What is the condition or disease you are interested in?
Intervention or exposure

What do you want to do with this patient (e.g. treat, diagnose, observe)?
Comparison

What is the alternative to the intervention (e.g. placebo, different drug, surgery)?
Outcome

What are the relevant outcomes (e.g. morbidity, death, complications)?
Ensure that the research question is answerable, feasible and clinically relevant
The next step in Submissions Area will be to develop a research hypothesis from the research question.

Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience PaperThe RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.Note: This is an individual assignment. In an essay, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations.

Question #1 (5 points):List the six types of real property and provide an example of each. Note that there is a formatting issue in the textbook. One bullet point includes three types of real property. Pay attention to what is in each bullet point (or better yet, go to the lecture). Question #2 (5 points):1. How do local jurisdictions use zoning laws to regulate building and land use? What are the three primary zones used?2. How do local jurisdictions use eminent domain laws?3. What are the issues that each can cause for the owners of the property subject to the zoning or eminent domain?Question #3 (5 points):What are the three primary things that you have learned in this course?