Why do you think Maiguru, despite her higher education, seems so subservient to Babamukuru?

Why do you think Tambu is resistant to Babamukuru’s demand that her parents get married? Why do you think Maiguru, despite her higher education, seems so subservient to Babamukuru? Why is Nyasha disappointed when her mother returns home after her major disagreement with Babamukuru? Link may help: https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Nervous-Conditions/chapter-8-summary/https://www.studypool.com/studyGuides/Nervous_Conditions/Chapter_Summaries/Chapter_8-10https://www.litcharts.com/lit/nervous-conditions/chapter-eight

Review the nature and structure of geography in at least one Australian university (UQ), present and discuss the data from your chosen case studies in the context of the two readings.

The focus for this assignment is Geography in universities.The papers by Holmes (2002) and Gibson (2007) (on Blackboard) examine Geography in Australian universities ‐ where Geography is located in terms of its disciplinary linkages and relationships, prominence on campus, how these things have changed over time, and what the implications may be for the future of the discipline.The same volume of Australian Geographical Studies (now Geographical Research) in which Holmes’ (2002) paper appeared also contains other articles on the topic which you might like to consult. These papers are high quality but a bit dated, you will want to also hunt up later reviews. The question is to see how Gibson’s observations and Holmes’ predictions have played out in Australian Universities over the following years.Using these papers as a base, the next part of the task is to review the nature and structure of geography in at least one Australian university (UQ) as well as other universities with which you may be familiar. The focus of the analysis should be an appraisal and assessment of how your chosen cases fit with the models, outcomes and predictions presented by Holmes and Gibson. Your analysis should be based on your own experience at UQ and on available data for other Universities as gleaned from appropriate websites and any other sources as available. Analysis of the assigned papers4. Review the nature and structure of geography in at least one Australian university (UQ), present and discuss the data from your chosen case studies in the context of the two readings5.

Write about how Christopher Marlowe and Sir walter waleigh we’re influential during the Renessaince period and provide examples from their poems and compare and contrast.

Use research and provide information on why christopher marlowe and sir walter raleigh we’re influential during renessaince period give evidence from their poems.Write about how Christopher Marlowe and Sir walter waleigh we’re influential during the Renessaince period and provide examples from their poems and compare and contrast.

Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.Part II – WritingWrite at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the samelink to .http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf

Write a paper on climate change.

An effective researched argument does more than just relate information–and it goes beyond simply summarizing and reviewing articles and/or stringing together a bunch of quotes from sources. Instead, you need to put forth your own educated opinion – expressed as a clear claim supported by valid reasons – and incorporate your synthesized research to create a cohesive, articulate argument intended to persuade a target audience who is also participating in the conversation.Conventions: Because the purpose of this essay is to persuade your readers to agree with your claim, your researched argument should:• Establish the context of your conversation and the importance of the topic under consideration.• Address a particular audience of readers invested in the topic and are possibly already participating in the conversation you’ve entered.• Use the most effective rhetorical approach to reach your intended audience. Such an approach might include any or all of the following:1. convincing your audience to consider the validity of your position.2. broadening your audience’s perception on the topic.3. clarifying your audience’s understanding of the topic.• Declare your position on the issue by making a claim.• Develop your argument by supporting your claim with evidence.