Category: Essay Help

Document Analysis: Period 6Attached are 5 documents with HIPP being asked of each.H – Historical ContextI – Intended AudienceP – Point of ViewP – PurposeThere’s a copy of the attached document for each. Fill out the google doc directly.Keep in mind that the AP Exam is a 45 min DBQ. This assignment should take you no more than 45 minutes. If it does take you longer, use that as a sign that you need to study this time period before the exam.The problem with our age is the proper administration of wealth, so that the ties of brotherhood may still bind together the rich and poor in harmonious relationship… The conditions of human life have not only been changed, but revolutionized… The contrast between the palace of the millionaire and the cottage of the laborer with us today measures the change which has come with civilization. This change, however, is not to be deplored, but welcomed as highly beneficial. It is well, nay, essential for the progress of the race, that the houses of some should be homes for all that is highest and best in literature and the arts, and for all the refinements of civilization, rather than that none should be so… A relapse to old conditions would be disastrous to both—not the least so to him who serves—and would sweep away civilization with it. But whether the change be for good or ill, it is upon us, beyond our power to alter, and therefore to be accepted and made the best of. It is a waste of time to criticize the inevitable… Andrew Carnegie, Wealth, 1889Historical Context:Intended Audience:Point of view:Purpose: The recent alarming development and aggression of aggregated wealth, which, unless checked, will invariably lead to the pauperization and hopeless degradation of the toiling masses, render it imperative, if we desire to enjoy the blessings of life, that a check should be placed upon its power and upon unjust accumulation, and a system adopted which will secure to the laborer the fruits of his toil; and as this much-desired object can only be accomplished by the thorough unification of labor, and the united efforts of those who obey the divine injunction that “in the sweat of thy brow shalt thou eat bread,” we have formed the Knight of Labor with a view of securing the organization and direction of the power of the industrial classes…Preamble to the Constitution of the Knights of Labor, 1878Historical Context:Intended Audience:Point of view:Purpose: The rapid displacement of men by women in the factory and workshop has to be met sooner or later, and the question is forcing itself upon the leaders and thinkers among the labor organizations of the land. Is it a pleasing indication of progress to see the father, the brother and the son displaced as the breadwinner by the mother, sister and daughter?…The growing demand for female labor is not founded upon philanthropy, as those who encourage it would have sentimentalists believe; it does not spring from the milk of human kindness. It is an insidious assault upon the home; it is the knife of the assassin, aimed at the family circle-the divine injunction. It debars the man through financial embarrassment from family responsibility, and physically, mentally and socially excludes the woman equally from nature’s dearest impulse. Is this the demand of civilized progress?Women as Breadwinners-The Error of the Age, 1887Historical Context:Intended Audience:Point of view:Purpose: There is no longer any room for a Populist Party, and progressive Populists realize it, and hence the ‘strongholds of Populism’ are becoming the ‘hot-beds’ of SocialismIt is simply a question of capitalism or Socialism, of despotism or democracy, and they who are not wholly with us are wholly against us… Oh, that all the working class could and would use their eyes and see; their ears and hear; their brains and think. How soon this earth could be transformed and by the alchemy of social order made to blossom with beauty and joy. Outlook for Socialism in the U.S., Eugene V. Debs, 1900Historical Context:Intended Audience:Point of view:Purpose: An act to provide for the allotment of lands in severalty to Indians on the various reservations, and to extend the protection of the laws of the United States and Territories over the Indians, and for other purposes. The Dawes Act, 1887Historical Context:Intended Audience:Point of view:Purpose:

Q1:~1000,Q2:~1000,Q3:2500-For Q3 (referrence)https://www.coronavirus.gov.hk/eng/index.htmlhttps://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/long-reads/article/3082162/why-american-mother-rushed-her-daughters-backDiscuss Health Assessment & Primary Health Care.

What were the economic impacts of the New Deal that led the country out of the great depression?

– Read the following case study- At the Markkula Ethics Center at Santa Clara University https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more/engineering-ethics/engineering-ethics-cases/copyright-concerns/ (Links to an external site.)- Give an account of what the main moral problem is, and apply one of the ethical theories we have studied this term to derive a conclusion, along with two original arguments to support the conclusion.I ALREADY WROTE A PAPER BUT THE PROFESSOR WASN’T SATISFIED. SHE GAVE ME A CHANCE TO RE-WRITE IT. I ATTACHED MINE BELOW.Ethics is a moral principle or standard to what is considered to be correct or corrupt within the confinement of human conscience. It is exercised in every aspect of our lives. We distinguish between the good and bad or the right and wrong in every decision and action we make. And people across the world seem to be developing and perfecting it through time in the service of humanity. Of course, that’s not without some catastrophic learning leaps. But overall, it’s warranted to say we have made a pretty good job in the 21st century when compared to anytime in history. And Ralph’s ethical dilemma characterizes a common modern-day challenge.His wrongdoing can be attributed to lack of awareness or pure ignorance and disregard to the law. Either way, it isn’t upright of him to resell a property that was originally his, but ownership rights are transferred and protected by Intellectual Property laws to his former employer. Ralph already traded his creation and was duly compensated by the startup company. One of the vocal proponents of Intellectual Property Rights, Copy Right Laws and Patents is Immanuel Kant. He strongly believed that an author should have complete authority over his or her production and his works on Deontological Ethics are precursors for it. Ralph and SDX Alliance are now faced with two possible moral choices: to ignore the Copyright Law and ethical responsibilities that usher it by using the codes to enhance their new product or to do the legal and honorable thing by avoiding to steal the codes and instead invest on developing a new program.According to Kant, it’s a legitimate argument to think human beings should be owners of their own intellect. It is a fact that the codes Ralph developed belonged to him at one point. And anyone who would have stolen or copied his ideas without permission would have been considered a thief. But that isn’t what his previous employer did. His employment at the startup was the ground for the of ownership of his codes to be transferred to his employer or the company. It is no longer his. Irrespective of that, he attempted to utilize the same program on the new project at SDX Alliance. Though he admitted his mistake, it’s his next move to rectify it that will determine his moral fitness. The company may choose to go with applying the stolen codes, but they’ll risk facing possible legal and moral consequences. If the former employer finds this out, they’ll be sued and probably lose everything they have and will have including wrecking their reputation.Kant believed Intellectual Property to be inalienable yet transferable. It can be commissioned or licensed to anyone the author wanted. Given that he already transferred the ownership, the right thing to do now is to develop a new program that will suit the project. SDX Alliance and Ralph have moral obligation not to steal what’s not theirs. According to Kant, a moral worth springs from reverence and respect for the moral law. And they have a moral duty to act accordingly.In conclusion, the moral paradox SDX Alliance and Ralph found themselves in can only be resolved if they remain true to themselves and society. In another words, to moral and legal laws. From a long-term business point of view, they’ll be avoiding unnecessary risk of losing everything they created, including their good name, which can also worsen the damage. It’s highly likely that they will be more profitable if they avoid the crooked option in front of them. This should also be taken as precedent for future similar circumstances. THE FOLLOWING STORY IS WHAT THE PROFESSOR WANTED US TO REFER FROM. (https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more/engineering-ethics/engineering-ethics-cases/copyright-concerns/)SDX Alliance is a large company that sells computers, computer components, and software. Ralph is hired as an entry-level software engineer at SDX Alliance. His first project was to assist in writing the code for SDX Alliance’s new hard disc controller. He had previously worked on a similar system interning at a start-up and had written a code which greatly enhanced the performance of their product. Ralph quietly re-uses this same code in the SDX Alliance product, and does not think to tell anyone that he has used the code from his last job. His manager is thrilled with the speed improvements this code brings to the product.Before the product is released, it has to undergo a four-month long quality assurance process review. During the review of the product, it was found the code which Ralph developed had been copyrighted by the startup he had previously worked for. Even though Ralph had developed the code, his previous company still owned the intellectual property rights to it.When his manager informed Ralph of the problem, Ralph admits he did not realize he had made a mistake because he was not familiar with copyright laws. Ralph then goes on to explain that the start-up he used to work for is now out of business and is unsure if SDX Alliance would be able to get in contact with the owner of the copyright. If SDX Alliance can’t use Ralph’s code, then it will have to rewrite the entire code of the product, delaying its release by many months.What should they do?

A. Discuss and analyze health information systems by doing the following:

1. Summarize advantages and disadvantages of a system, including the following:

• usability

• interoperability

• scalability

• compatibility

2. Describe how a system will affect patient care and documentation.

3. Explain how using a system to access information will affect the quality and delivery of nursing care and patient outcomes.

B. Discuss how a system will benefit the organization by addressing the following:

1. Provide two ways that quality improvement (QI) data collected from a system can lead to measurable improvement in health care services and the health status of targeted patient groups.

2. Explain how a system will meet HITECH and HIPAA security standards and regulations, including the following:

• data storage integrity

• data backup and recovery

3. Explain how a system will protect patient privacy.

4. Describe how adopting a system will improve organizational efficiency and productivity by addressing the following factors to the organization, including the following:

• standardizing documentation

• reducing waste

• increasing productivity

• human and capital resource

C. Describe four essential stakeholder roles needed to form an interdisciplinary team to work on a system implementation, including the following:

• each team member’s title in the organization

• each team member’s role in the implementation of the health information system

• each team member’s expertise and how it contributes to the success of the project

D. Discuss your plan for evaluating the success of the implementation of a system by incorporating two professional organization standards.

E. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
NOT EVIDENT

A summary of the advantages and disadvantages of a health information system is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The summary lacks key details about the advantages or disadvantages of a health information system, or the summary contains inaccuracies about 1 or more of the given points.

COMPETENT

The summary provides key details about the advantages and disadvantages of a health information system, including an accurate description of each of the given points.

A2:PATIENT CARE AND DOCUMENTATION
NOT EVIDENT

A description of how a system will affect patient care and documentation is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description is illogical or lacks key details about how a system will affect patient care or documentation or both.

COMPETENT

The description is logical and provides key details about how a system will affect patient care and documentation.

A3:QUALITY AND DELIVERY OF NURSING CARE AND PATIENT OUTCOMES
NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how using a system to access information will affect the quality and delivery of nursing care and patient outcomes is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation lacks key details about using a system to access information, or the explanation illogically addresses how accessing information will affect the quality or delivery, or both, of nursing care and patient outcomes.

COMPETENT

The explanation provides key details about using a system to access information, and the explanation logically addresses how accessing information will affect the quality and delivery of nursing care and patient outcomes.

B1:WAYS QI DATA CAN LEAD TO MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT
NOT EVIDENT

The submission of 2 ways that QI data can be used is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission is missing information about how QI data collected from a system can lead to measureable improvement in health care services and the health status of targeted patient groups.

COMPETENT

The submission appropriately details 2 ways that QI data collected from a system can lead to measurable improvement in healthcare services and the health status of targeted patient groups.

B2:HITECH AND HIPAA SECURITY STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS
NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of security standards and regulations is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion is illogical or lacks key details about the security standards and regulations, or the discussion contains inaccuracies about the given points.

COMPETENT

The discussion is logical and provides key details about the security standards and regulations, and the discussion accurately addresses the given points.

B3:PROTECTION OF PATIENT PRIVACY
NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how a system will protect patient privacy is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation is illogical or contains inaccuracies about the features of a system, or the explanation lacks key details about the system’s ability to protect patient privacy.

COMPETENT

The explanation is logical and accurately addresses features of a system, and the explanation provides key details about how the system will protect patient privacy.

B4:ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY
NOT EVIDENT

A description of how a system will improve organizational efficiency and productivity is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description is illogical or lacks key details about how adopting a system will improve organizational efficiency and productivity, or the description contains inaccuracies about 1 or more of the given points.

COMPETENT

The description is logical and provides key details about how adopting a system will improve organizational efficiency and productivity, incorporating all of the given points.

C:INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM IDENTIFICATION
NOT EVIDENT

A description of 4 essential interdisciplinary team members on the project committee is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description of the 4 essential interdisciplinary team members on the project committee lacks key details about 1 or more of the given points, or the description does not relate the team to the migration project.

COMPETENT

The description of the 4 essential interdisciplinary team members on the project committee provides key details about all of the given points, and the description logically relates the team to the migration project.

D:PLAN FOR EVALUATING SUCCESS OF IMPLEMENTING A SYSTEM
NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the plan to evaluate the success of implementing a system is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion lacks key details about the plan to evaluate the success of implementing a system, or the discussion illogically incorporates 1 or more of the required professional organization standards.

COMPETENT

The discussion provides key details about the plan to evaluate the success of implementing a system, and the discussion logically incorporates 2 professional organization standards.

E:SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION:
NOT EVIDENT

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

COMPETENT

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

M2A1: Evaluate the EvidenceYou have viewed the scenario provided to you at the beginning of this week. You will be working with this case throughout your capstone course.The purpose of the assignment is for you to demonstrate your mastery of the following BHS program outcome (PO):PO1: Identify and evaluate evidence to guide decision making. In this scenario, your role is that of a new employee in a health setting related to your declared emphasis. The scenario also depicted your new supervisor, who has given you a problem to address. Review the montage of photographs, your supervisor’s explanation of the issues the organization is facing, and the folder of information provided to you. Your first assignment is to evaluate the packet of evidence (your Portfolio handout provided by your instructor in response to your emphasis submission in Module 1) related to the problem including data, existing research, and other information, provided by your supervisor. You will evaluate each piece of evidence (e.g., articles, reports, etc.) provided in the portfolio for the credibility of sources and usefulness, relevance, and applicability of the evidence to the problem or issue presented in the case scenario that you are charged to address. To accomplish this, please carefully refer to the Evaluating Evidence (Links to an external site.) page of your BHS Capstone Library Course Guide. Then you will write a paper based on your analysis of the evidence provided in your portfolio.Your paper should include an analysis of the information provided and address the following:Briefly explain the issue you are being asked to address and the context in which you will be working.Of the information provided by your supervisor in your portfolio, which sources did you find credible and why? Which were relevant to the issue you were asked to address at the end of your case scenario video? Please explain.What information in the portfolio was not as credible or relevant? Please explain.

Students should get paid for good grades?

Describe Infant mortality.

Compose collective written project Dirty Dancing film 1987, from the perspective of aesthetic, economic, social history .use articles scholar, articles,

wite a research paper on the drawbacks of zinc oxide and eugenol, alginate, and addition silicone impression materials and methods to overcome each one. write on recent developments in silicone impression materials.