Write a research paper about Sports Managment and discuss hoew to increase efficiency in modern sports.

1. Write an essay A) explaining the proper way to understand the Christian doctrine of creatio ex nihilo showing exactly why thinkers such as Karl Barth and Etienne Gilson would want to avoid saying that “To be God is to be the Creator.” What were they affirming and what were they negating? B) Then, explain the difference between pantheism and panentheism. C) Finally, using examples from our class discussions (Moltmann, Knitter, Whitehead, Ogden and Migliore) to make your points, explain exactly why panentheism either succeeds or fails to maintain the freedom of God and therefore the intended meaning of the doctrine of creation from nothing. D) Finally, How does the thinking of Angelus Silesius and Paul Fiddes relate to these issues? 2. Explain the main teaching of the Council of Chalcedon regarding the person and work of Jesus Christ by discussing why the bishops in 451 wanted to avoid monophysitism, adoptionism (Nestorianism) and extreme forms of Alexandrian and Antiochene Christology. What were these extreme forms of Christology and what was the problem with them from a Christocentric standpoint? Make sure you give examples to illustrate your points. Then, relying on the PowerPoint presentations, discuss the proper understanding of the hypostatic union explaining why the terms enhypostasis and anhypostasis were used by theologians in the Patristic era to understand the mystery Jesus Christ as the incarnate Word.
Five fictional tort-injury scenarios are described below. Create a “legal overview” and comment on each scenario. Please provide approx. For each scenario, carefully review the client’s case facts. If the client is seeking to file suit, identify what tort claim(s) may exist, the elements of those tort(s) and application-based analysis of the elements based on the facts as pertains to the claim(s).If the client has been sued, determine what defenses may exist, the requirements for those defenses and evaluate viability. Remember, a client may have NO claim or defense, so, examine the facts carefully to correctly assess the client’s case. Incorporate on-point statutory and case law research to support your conclusions. Case #1 Moran v. Franks, Inc. Your client, Rick Moran, wants to file suit for injuries he alleges occurred as the result of riding the ‘ Bat Outta Hell ‘ roller coaster at Seaview Amusement Park, owned by Franks, Inc. Mr. Moran says he fell out of the coaster on an upside down turn, due to a failure of the seat bar to hold him in the seat.Medical reports indicate two broken ribs and a sprained neck resulting from physical impact. Investigation shows the coaster car Rick was in had a loose safety bar which had not been inspected as required by city ordinance. Investigation also indicated Rick was standing in the car at the time of the accident, a violation of ride rules.Case #2 Harvey v. Schmoltz Your client, Elvira Schmoltz, was recently sued by Bart Harvey based on her statements to a PTA meeting, with over 50 members in attendance, that “Bart is a poor father and a pedophile who enjoys sex with minor children.” There is no independent evidence Bart has engaged in any such conduct and, to the contrary, Bart is a model father to his 2 sons. Witnesses at the meeting confirm the statement was made. Bart does have a prior conviction for speeding and for trespass on Elvira’s property over 10 years ago. Case #3 Rhand Corporation v. Justine Rhand Corporation has hired your law firm to sue Emil Justine based upon his filing of a baseless lawsuit last year alleging that Rhand’s subsidiary served a soft drink which was too cold, causing an alleged stomach irritation. Justine ultimately produced no evidence to support his claim, after strenuously trying to settle the case with Rhand for several months before the case was ultimately dismissed in Rhand’s favor on a Motion for Summary Judgment. Rhand suffered over $75,000 in legal fees and other expenses related to defending the case. Justine even confided in one of Rhand’s employees that he was hoping to get “anything he could to get Rhand back for firing him a year earlier.”Case # 4 Yutz v. Schmuck Jack Yutz wants your law firm to file suit against Henry Schmuck for emotional injuries resulting from Schmuck’s actions at a local restaurant. Investigation indicates that Yutz and his wife were having dinner at “The Steak Pit” and, upon receiving their order, Jack complained to the waiter that the prime rib was overdone and dry, demanding a new order as originally requested, i.e., medium rare. Moments later, the restaurant owner, Schmuck, approached Yutz and while shaking his butcher knife in Yutz’s face, yelled at Yutz “You have some nerve, you moron, complaining about my cooking! I’m gonna cut your rib out and cook it medium rare!” Though Yutz admits not being afraid when Schmuck was yelling, he still suffered sleepless nights and is in therapy for DSS (Delayed Stress Syndrome). Case #5 Threlkiss v. Ashcroft, Pizzarama, Inc. Ms. Happy Threlkiss, 67 years old, recently released from the hospital after receiving treatment for a nervous breakdown, retains your law firm to sue Richard Ashcroft and Pizzarama, Inc., on her and her niece’s behalf, for injuries resulting from an incident which occurred on January 7th of the current year.On that date, Happy was walking hand in hand with her three-year-old niece from their car to the Pizzarama restaurant door when Ashcroft, a maintenance worker for Pizzarama, was operating a weed-eater to trim the lawn by the sidewalk Happy and her niece were walking on.As Happy and her niece approached Ashcroft to enter Pizzarama, Ashcroft looked up at them, smiling, and then viciously attacked the niece with the weed-eater, chewing up her legs and back requiring 30 days hospitalization, over 200 hundred stitches and extensive plastic surgery. Happy was immediately admitted to the hospital as well. Investigation shows Ashcroft was working for Pizzarama at the time, but Ashcroft had no known history of violence.Here’s some vocabulary to keep in mind. Try to incorporate as many of them into your essay as you feel are applicable: “personal injury” “tort law” “ADR“ “negligence” “breach of duty” “burden of proof” “res ipsa loquitor” “liability” “vicarious liability” “absolute liability” “emotional distress”NOTE > Please cite all sources.
Having read George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” create an analysis to formulate a paper that demonstrates your understanding of the material.Course materials can be used. Handouts such as Fukuyama, Political Spectrum, (Ferris) and Clausewitz are especially useful. On the “tools of analysis” page there are links for outside information including links for recommended news sources to include current events.We also reviewed Voting, Historical Documents, The Constitution, and Current Events. Can you compare any of these? Use any three types of analysis you wantFeel free to reuse your summaries and analysis from previous essays and current events, but reword to avoid plagiarism.Paper might look like: Summarize a theme/chapters or characters from the book. Apply the summary to the Administration, compare with Fukuyama, and use the Political Spectrum to explain ideology
First of all hello and thanks for writing this. However, It is really important that you do things in a certain way. Write a research paper criticizing Okonkwo from a psychoanalytical point of view. And for the structure of the paper, please make it as the following: The cause, use his father as an example. The core issues, talk about his insecurities regards to his dad, and a couple other ones that you see fit.How his core issues show in his role in the family. How this shows in his role in the tribe and his understanding of his culture.How this shows in his reaction colonialists.
Think of some challenges you have faced in your current or previous employment. Summarize the problem, develop a research question, and state the null and alternative hypotheses that could be used to solve this problem. Explain whether the hypotheses are concerned with relationships between variables or differences between groups.Select a current issue within your workplace, social organization, or home, and briefly describe a workable research design to help solve that problem.our journal entry must be at least 200 words in length.Ebook Link https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/webapps/bbgs-vitalsource-bb_bb60/app/launch/content?course_id=_101899_1&content_id=_6221242_1
For this discussion, respond to two of the five prompts below:1. Considering the North Native American Apache myth of the Vagina Girls, discuss the objectification and repression of female sexuality. What other myths possess similar characteristics? Why is this issue present with such frequency? Explain.2. Considering the Indian myth of the Cosmic Tree, discuss any significant links to the Chinese creation myth of the Cosmic Egg.3. Discuss Jeffrey Hopkins’s conclusions regarding the differentiation of urban and rural mythmaking. Why is this distinction important for Hopkins? What does this distinction reveal about the values of urban and rural communities? Explain.4. Discuss Park and Coppack’s analysis of symbolic landscapes within the larger framework of a city. What makes these spaces necessarily symbolic? What do these symbols represent? Why is it necessary to view these same spaces outside the context of a specific history? Explain.5. How does the Black Mirror episode “White Christmas” conceptualize the labyrinth as an interior space? Why might this characteristic become the more effective form of isolation or punishment? Explain.