Discuss the history of any periodic element.

Weight: 5% of course gradeGrading RubricInstructionsCase AnalysisDave is a driver for Empire Courier Service. Around the company, Dave is known as sort of a hothead. During his previous employment at another company, Dave had been involved in a workplace fistfight with a fellow employee, resulting in criminal charges.One day, between deliveries and in a company vehicle, Dave decides to get lunch. While leaving the parking lot at Big Burrito Bistro, the favorite lunch spot for most Empire Courier employees, Dave negligently causes a car accident with another vehicle, resulting in injuries to Victor, the driver of the other car. As Dave and Victor are waiting on the side of the road for the police to arrive, Victor comments to Dave, “Oh, you drive for Empire Courier Service. It doesn’t surprise me that Empire hires bad drivers because their service stinks, and their prices are too high!” Dave is so offended that Victor would insult his employer’s professional reputation that he punches Victor in the face, causing Victor to suffer even more injuries. Empire Courier Service does not, as a matter of policy, do criminal background checks on its employees.Considering the legal principles discussed in Chapter 20, explain who is liable for Dave’s negligence for causing the car accident, and explain who is liable for Dave’s intentional tort for punching Victor.
Describe, compare and evaluate 3 articles
In this essay task we want you to analyse three existing qualitative research papers from one of nine research domains (see list of domains below). The aim of this exercise is for you to demonstrate that you can critically evaluate existing research papers and the use of qualitative research methods.
1. Choose 3 key articles that use qualitative methods such as observation, interview, case study, and discourse analysis. Please DO NOT select articles that use survey methodology.
2. Explain your selection process, as well as the rationale behind selecting these specific articles
3. Concisely summarise the articles
4. Describe, compare and evaluate the main research questions explored in each study
5. Describe, compare and evaluate the methodology (data collection, sampling, setting description)
6. Describe, compare and evaluate analysis
7. Describe, compare and evaluate the findings/conclusion/discussions
8. Personal reflexion
9. Once you submit your essay, please also submit the 3 articles you selected as Appendix. You do that by merging your essay and the three articles into one PDF. See how to do that here: https://www.wikihow.com/Merge-PDF-Files
Research domains:
1. Organisational culture
2. Organisational identity
3. Small-group/ team studies
4. Cross-cultural studies
5. Joint ventures/collaborations
6. Organisational change
7. Decision making processes
8. Organisational control / emotional control
9. Organisational accidents/incidents/failures
Please read the file dated 4-19-2020 titled “Inspection Report” (This is uploaded in the files section of this course, in the event the link does not work). Click on Files, then April-19-2020 inspection report.pdf , the link is below:-April-19-2019-inspection-report.pdfPreview the documentOnce you have completed reading the 35-page report of citations from the surveyor citing deficient practices in nursing (left side of the page). Please read the plan of correction (right side of the report) which is where the facility responded with what they would do to become compliant.Prepare a 3-page typed paper inclusive of introduction, respond to the questions below, and provide a summary. Times New Roman, 12 size font, typed, cover, reference page, and 3 cited references are required. It is recommended you use the paper template provided by VNI. Support your opinions with authoritative references (references in the past 5 years, not Wikipedia, WebMD, but published articles, peer-reviewed, or textbooks). Please review the last paper you submitted and show progress by not making the same errors in this paper. Point deduction for repeat errors can be up to 20 points.Question 1: Which deficiency was the most egregious in nature, in your opinion and why.Question 2: If you were the manager on the unit where the most egregious deficiency occurred, what would you have done differently to correct/prevent the issue from occurring again. This must be different than what the plan of correction already states.Question 3: What was your impression after reading this survey report on the types of overall deficiencies cited? Did you feel the surveyor was fair in writing the deficient practices? why or why not?Question 4: How did reading this survey report help you to become a better nurse in practice? Please be very specific and share at least two ways this assignment will help you to improve your nursing practice.Rubric:Topic DescriptorPoint ValuePoints AchievedCover Page /spell check/ semantics /diction10Introduction10Question 115Question 215Question 315Question 415Summary10References10Total Points100The due date for the paper: 5/8/2020 at 9:30 am