Identify the main focus or key framing point for the chapter (big picture sentence(s) about whatthe chapter focuses on.

Finish reading the chapter 9 of the book Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise (Ericsson & Pool, 2016).Revised Assignment for Assigned Discussion Facilitators:1. Identify the main focus or key framing point for the chapter (big picture sentence(s) about whatthe chapter focuses on.2. Identify and explain five (5) key points made by the authors in the chapter – the importantconcepts as you see them.3. Identify at least five (5) questions that you would use to create and facilitate discussion in theclass (if we were in the class). Provide an answer to each question. You can also substitute an ideayou have about an activity the class could do for any of these questions.4. Identify the key take away or summary point(s) of the chapter as you see it.

How is knowledge being produced and circulated?

Final Paper: Reflexive Analysis (30 points).Students will write a 6-10 page paper that describes their own experiences as a group/team participant or as a facilitator of a group or a team. Using the course readings, students will provide a well-referenced analysis of your own experience as both a facilitator and participant of a group in this course, as well as any other personal or professional experience with a team, a group or organization that you have been a part of. Part 1: Co-facilitation and Participation Reflexive AnalysisDescribe your experience co-facilitation in our class, in another setting, OR in your future plans for how you would like to facilitate:• What theory informed your co-facilitation practice and what informed your participation practice as a group member? •Which concepts did you attempt to apply or will you attempt to apply? Did you attempt to try something new or will you? What went well and what could have gone better? •Based on the readings, what is your analysis of your facilitation and participation approach?Part 2: Discourse Analysis Students will then analyze their own experience with an outside multidisciplinary team, group/organization, or professional network (either currently or reflecting on your past experiences). The task for this portion of the paper is to apply concepts from the course learnings to conduct a discursive analysis of team-based knowledge production, meaning that you are being invited to analyze how the group “created” knowledge.. You may choose to analyze any previous or current experience with a MDT, group or team – the goal is to critically think about the structural and discursive context (and what is enabled and constrained because of those contexts).•Describe the context of the group, a description of the discourse: it’s function, how roles are described, the discursive “culture,” as well as discursive influences on team(or group) members’ actions, and analysis of the team’s communicative and relational practices. How is knowledge being produced and circulated? Which knowledges are valued and/or dismissed?• Include your professional recommendations for the team/group, based on the course readings.

Critically discuss ‘The quest for justice requires more than legal measures’.

Academic essay – ‘The quest for justice requires more than legal measures’. Critically discuss this statement with reference to examples.Try to mention:1. The connection between law and justice2. Other modes of justice- Rectificatory/ reparative justice- Social/ distributive justice3. Limitations of using the legal system as a from of justice- Reduced narratives/ ignores singularity/dehumanise and decontextualise- Not restorative/reparative (MAY mention Van Boven Principles)- Doesn’t address beneficiaries of justice