Should we be providing therapy, are we trained to provide therapy, did LACE change the face of PMH education and the role?

There is much discussion among Psychiatric providers as to whether or not it is our role to provide therapy along with medication management. There are differences of opinions between PMHNP’s and PMHCNS’s. The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification & Education (LACE) made for much of this discussion to take place. In your opinion – Should we be providing therapy, are we trained to provide therapy, did LACE change the face of PMH education and the role?

Based on what you know from this course, in your opinion what needs to be done to change the mental health status to a positive direction?

Readings https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/data-search/midcourse-review/lhi https://www.healthypeople.gov http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3649_59bd044d585c803690e1664ca9177e5c.pdf The LHI mental health status is getting worse according to the Healthy People 2020 website. Based on what you know from this course, in your opinion what needs to be done to change the mental health status to a positive direction?

What would it mean to read both Gregor and Bartleby as tragic figures of modernity?

What would it mean to read both Gregor and Bartleby as tragic figures of modernity? In what ways do their respective authors hold them up to us readers as tragic heroes? (Pleasenote: A tragic hero was defined by Aristotle as a figure whose lack of knowledge, deficiency of virtue, or excess of character leads him or her to ruin and/or destruction.) In what ways are these two characters the victims to the social and cultural circumstances to which they belong? How do Kafka (author of Metamorphasis) and Melville (author of Bartleby) indicate this to us as readers? In what ways do they use these characters to comment upon the nature of (office) work and modern society moregenerally? Write an argumentative essay putting any stance forward using the above questions as a prompt(s).Here are the official directions for the assignmentPlease note: these essay prompts are designed to stimulate the development of your own views on the work in question, and so simply answering the questions posed in each prompt is insufficient for the purposes of this assignment. It is vitally important that in developing your reading of the novel, that you substantiate it by means of textual evidence, which you must cite and explain.

What might their conversation teach us about the political and social values of early America?

The essay must each have a thesis (an argument), and your points must be backed up with solid evidence. A good rule of thumb is to try to refer to at least three specific readings in support of your argument. Please remember that demonstrating a mere grasp of factual material is insufficient; rather, you should be using facts to convey an analysis of the important developments during the period we have studied. It is really your ability to analyze and interpret that will determine your grade on the essays. Each essay will be worth 50 points.Imagine that space, time and social conventions could be collapsed in such a way that Mary Rowlandson, Thomas Paine, John Ross and Frederick Douglass were all able to attend the same dinner party. What might these individuals have to talk about? Would they agree on many issues? Would they disagree? What might their conversation teach us about the political and social values of early America.

What are some reasons that someone might disagree with you?

The topic of having a “designer” baby is one that can be very controversial. Dictionary online defines a designer baby as, “a baby whose genetic makeup has been selected in order to eradicate a particular defect, or to ensure that a particular gene is present”.The topic has many pros and cons, and these pros and cons are related to all backgrounds, and beliefs. Research more about designer babies and take a stand either for or against this topic.In your discussion post address the following:Explain your position, and why you made that selection.What information did you find that supports your thinking?What are some reasons that someone might disagree with you?