Provide guidance to President Xi Jinping of China on the question of should China continue to pursue cooperative political and economic relations with the US?

Specifically, you are expected to provide guidance to President Xi Jinping of China on the question of should China continue to pursue cooperative political and economic relations with the US? OR to President Donald Trump of the US on the question of should the US continue to pursue cooperative political and economic relations with China? In your briefing paper, you must provide the president with a recommendation that is based upon the principles of International Relations and rooted in historical evidence. To this end,you must identify which theory or theories of International Relations your recommendation is based on and explain how this theory (or theories) has informed your argument.Furthermore, you must cite supporting evidence from at least 2 of the cases we have examined in this course and explain how the evidence from these cases has informed your recommendation. This is where you are telling the President why this paper matters.Current status: a short outline of the current situation – including who is involved, what is happening now, and what has happened in recent history (the last 6-12 months) to shape the situation. Options: a statement of the various (usually 2 or 3) options available to the President and a brief summary of the anticipated impacts of each option.Recommendation & evidence: a statement of the course of action that you are recommending the President take and a detailed analysis of the evidence – both theoretical and historical (from the cases) – supporting your recommendation. This is where you are putting forth your argument to the President and explaining to him – using evidence drawn from a theory or theories of International Relations and from at least 2 cases – the reasoning behind your argument. You should also feel free to use other sources – including the framework readings or articles from reputable media outlets (such as Foreign Policy Magazine, Foreign Affairs, the Financial Times, the New York Times, etc.) – to provide additional support for your argument.Conclusion & restatement of recommendation: a summary of the main points of your briefing paper and a restatement of your recommendation.

Submit a paper, written with the English faculty as your audience, explaining which of the elements is most expendable (and could be cut) and which one is most necessary (and should therefore not be cut) and why.

Imagine you are a high school English teacher. Though the English department initially allotted one week for studying each of the literary elements listed below, due to a possum infestation, the principal has announced that the school will need to be closed for a week, requiring one of these elements to be cut. To help faculty reach a consensus on what to cut, the department chair has asked all Engl ish faculty members to write and circulate their recommendations with detailed support for which element should be cut out and which elements are essential. Submit a paper, written with the English faculty as your audience, explaining which of the elements is most expendable (and could be cut) and which one is most necessary (and should therefore not be cut) and why. Please analyze at least three specific readings from LIT100 to explain why certain elements are essential or inessential to appreciating literature, as your colleagues value concrete examples.Literary elements under consideration: Plot, point of view, character, setting, tone, imagery, rhyme sche me, figurative comparisons, word choice, tragedy, and identification of theme.The English Department is composed of busy faculty members whom you know from casual conversation hold a range of different positions on what is vital and expendable in the curriculum. Thus, lead with your main idea, develop your argument through prominent topic sentences, respectfully anticipate counter-positions, identify and analyze possible assumptions that might contribute to different conclusions, and write clearly and concisely. Proofread your essay so your readers take your argument seriously.

Write a case Study that describes how Abercrombie & Fitch engaged in “creative” recruiting to fill sales jobs with candidates who matched the company’s carefully constructed marketing image.

Write a case Study that describes how Abercrombie & Fitch engaged in “creative” recruiting to fill sales jobs with candidates who matched the company’s carefully constructed marketing image. The high-profile clothing retailer staffed its stores with good-looking young white men and women and touched off a lawsuit that ultimately cost the company $40 million and a barrage of bad publicity.
Do you think Abercrombie should be allowed to staff its stores in a way that reinforces its marketing image? Why & why not? Present both sides of the argument.
What are some alternative ways Abercrombie can staff its stores legally and still project a desirable image?
Book: Strategic Staffing 3rd Edition: Phillips, M. Jean, Gully, M. Stanley 2015

Write a paper analyzing both the year 1964 and the characteristics of the decade that followed. What were the characteristics of the Sixties?

After completing the assigned readings for module 7, craft a thesis-driven essay discussing the cultural climate of the 1960s. Base your essay on the relevant sections of of the Out of Many textbook and the article (click here) 1964- The Year the Sixties Began by Joshua Zeitz.Your paper should analyze both the year 1964 and the characteristics of the decade that followed. What were the characteristics of the Sixties? What is the author trying to accomplish in the article? Do you agree with his key points?

Explain the time period in which each of these sources were written. (This is historical context.) Do these sources show a change over time, or no real change?

Final Essay AssignmentIn a formal essay, compare two sources, (from class) that are from two different time periods. It is suggested that one source is from the 1700s/1800s and another is from 1900s/2000s. Explain how these sources relate to each other. Explain the time period in which each of these sources were written. (This is historical context.) Do these sources show a change over time, or no real change?You will be graded on the following:1.Use of two sources from class. 2.Accurate and in-depth description of sources. 3.Placing the sources within their time period. (historical context). Not treating the source like it is a present-day source. Not treating something from 1900 like it is from 1800, etc. 4.Comparison of sources in a way that takes into account the historical period of the sources. 5.Discussion of whether these sources show historical change or not. 6.Include an introduction and conclusion. 7.Use of a paragraph structure that is organized. Generally, one main idea per paragraph. 8.Demonstrate knowledge of your topic. 9.Demonstrate knowledge of this course.