Analyse How does it make a unique contribution to the source list that you are collecting for this project?

What is the main purpose of the source? Who is its audience? What is the main thesis or argument of the piece, or the main findings?a 2- to 3-sentence statement about what this source offers you as the researcher / analysto How does it make a unique contribution to the source list that you are collecting for this project? What distinguishes it from other sources?How do you plan to use this source in your project?

Discuss what this data means to you and how you might support people with a disability during the middle years to prevent additional mental and physical health problems.

1. Explore the concept of ‘midlife crisis’ and discuss what the term means and suggest some ways a person may be supported (either individually, as part of a group or at a population level) to manage it effectively.The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2012) reported that half (50%) of people aged under 65 with a severe or profound disability had mental health conditions, compared with 8% for those without a disability. Discuss what this data means to you and how you might support people with a disability during the middle years to prevent additional mental and physical health problems.Please respond to the following questions by clicking ‘Reply’.Define the terms co-morbidity and multi-morbidity highlighting the differences between the terms.Discuss how multi-morbidities impact the ageing populations of Australia and describe two or three evidence based prevention strategies to minimise their impact.Discuss the issue of the double burden of disease impacting later years of life in low income countries.

Personal worldview of Origins.

You are to provide (i) a description of your own answers to any 6 (out of 8) of the fundamental questions and (ii) at least one critique of your own worldview, preferably using the criteria for worldview analysis (explanatory scope, coherence, etc). In part (i), you should interact with the different Sages and their views. That is, when offering your answers to the fundamental questions, compare and/or contrast your views with some of the Sages. When you provide your own answers, you do not need to quote from a source but you can if you like (e.g., a Muslim student might quote the Koran, another student may not quote anything at all). However, you should quote from the different sages from the class in order to explain some of your agreements or disagreements with their views. So, if you were addressing the FQ on condition and the soul, one might say, ‘I disagree with Socrates who holds that we each have individual, immortal souls (The Defence 455c) but I do agree with the Buddha who denied that we have any sort of soul (The Dhammapada 455). A good paper will: (a) provide 1 or 2 comparisons/contrasts in each fundamental question. For example, you might write on Origin that you hold to an ex nihilo creation by God and this is in contrast to Krishna who held to …., as the Bhagavad Gita says in….. A good paper will also (b) interact at least once with all four sages covered in the class. (c) always keep the ‘why’ question in mind. Why do you hold to this answer about Origins?, and why do you agree or disagree with the Buddha?, etc.