What are some of the issues you should be concerned about regarding verbal and nonverbal communication for this group to avoid misinterpretations and barriers to communication?

Your coffee franchise cleared for business in both countries (Mexico, and China). You now have to develop your global franchise team and start construction of your restaurants. . You invite all of the players to the headquarters in the United States for a big meeting to explain the project and get to know one another since they represent the global division of your company. You are concerned with the following two issues. Substantively address each in a two-part paper, applying Beyond the Book, MUSE, Intellipath and library resources to support your reasoningPart 1: Effective communication with participantsWhat are the implications of the cultural variables for your communication with the team representative from each country in the face to face meeting?Address Hall’s high and low context regarding verbal and non-verbal communication. The United States is a low context culture, while each country is high context.Tip: Write at least one substantive paragraph for each countryVideo on Hall’s high and Low Context CommunicationPart 2: Effective communication among participantsWhat are examples of barriers and biases in cross-cultural business communications that may impact the effectiveness of communication among the meeting participants and in potential negotiations? What are some of the issues you should be concerned about regarding verbal and nonverbal communication for this group to avoid misinterpretations and barriers to communication?

Using at least 10 words from the Classical Music word cloud, describe specific elements that relate to your musical selection.

Using at least 10 words from the Classical Music word cloud, describe specific elements that relate to your musical selection. Note that the following words do not count towards the 10-word requirement: music, musical, composer/s and Classical. Write in complete sentences. The ten terms need to be used in a way that relates to music and/or culture in the Classical era. Initial posts are to be a minimum of 250 words.
Bold or highlight the ten words in your answer chosen from the Classical Music word cloud.
Post your completed answer to the WK4 Forum.

Listening List
Mozart, “Piano Sonata No. 11 in A major, third movement”
Mozart, “Piano Concerto No. 21 in C major, K. 467”
Mozart, “Symphony No. 40 in G minor, K. 550, fourth movement”
Mozart, “Der Hölle Rach” from act 2 of The Magic Flute
Mozart, “The Marriage of Figaro, Overture”
Haydn, “String Quartet No. 62 in C major”
Haydn, “String Quartet No. 53 in D major, Op. 64, No. 5” (“The Lark”)
Haydn, “Symphony No. 94 in G major” (“The Surprise Symphony”)
Haydn, “Trumpet Concerto in E-flat major”
Beethoven, “Piano Concerto No. 4 in G major, Op. 58, second & third movement”
Beethoven, “Symphony No. 5 in C minor, Op.67, Allegro con Brio”
Beethoven, “String Quartet No. 6 in B-flat major”

Write a 2000 (make sure it’s 2000) word review essay for an international relations journal.

Write a 2000 (make sure it’s 2000) word review essay for an international relations journal. Review essays are not the same as a book review. They critically assess and engage with one or more texts and bring in other sources (for example to support a weakness identified or to place a piece in relation to a wider debate). They will also usually articulate what this text or group of texts contributes to a particular political or academic debate.

A review essay needs to include the following:

· A good summary of the articles and/or books under review, especially their key arguments.

· What you learned from them that you think is important for readers to know, in particular contributions to your understanding of war and the specific topic discussed, and key political, conceptual, and/or policy issues that the authors introduce.

· Shortcomings of or weaknesses in the analysis and/or the argument.

· Overall evaluation of the contribution the articles and/or books make for our understanding of war and the specific topic.

· You also need to consult at least two other academic sources and include them substantively, i.e. supporting your review, in the essay.

Your essay will be evaluated in terms of how well it does the above.

PLEASE NOTE= you can pick either 1 or 2 (depending which one you’ll have access to online as I have no pdf version)

1. Compare and critically review the following two articles on ‘lawfare’.

Irani, Freya (2018), “’Lawfare’, US military discourse, and the colonial constitution of law and war,” European Journal of International Security 3(1): 113-133.

Jones, Craig A. (2015), ‘Frames of law: targeting advice and operational law in the Israeli military,’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33(4): 676-696.

2. Compare and critically review the following three articles on militarism/militarisation.

Mabee, Bryan and Srdjan Vucetic (2018), ‘Varieties of militarism: Towards a typology,”Security Dialogue 49(1-2): 96-108

Abrahamsen, Rita (2018), ‘Return of the generals? Global militarism in Africa from the Cold War to the present,’Security Dialogue 49(1-2): 19-31.
Howell, Alison (2018), “Forget ‘militarization’: race, disability and the ‘martial politics’ of the police and of the university”, International Feminist Journal of Politics 20(2): 117-136.