Category: Essay Help

Part 1 Recognizing that a just criminal justice system has limited power and upholds the unalienable rights of the citizenry, consider the following scenario: You are a police officer and you are dispatched to a noise complaint at a residence in your jurisdiction. When you arrive at the residence, you hear loud music coming from the house that would constitute a violation of the noise ordinance in your community. You do not get an answer when you knock on the front door, so you walk around to the back of the house. When you get to the back porch, you see what you recognize to be several marijuana plants based on your training and experience. As you are examining the plants, the resident comes to the door and begins yelling at you to “get off of my property.”Note: for the purposes of this scenario, assume you are in a state where marijuana, medicinal or otherwise, is not legal.Based on this information, respond to the following questions:1.Can you seize the marijuana plants at that time? If yes, what is your legal justification for doing so? If no, what legally prohibits you from doing so? What biblical principles should you be considering?2.Based on your observation of the marijuana plants, do you need a search warrant to enter and search the house and the resident? If yes, what is the basis for this legal requirement? If no, what is the justification for this exception to the search warrant requirement? What biblical principles should you be considering?3.If you enter the residence and seize additional evidence inside and that search and seizure is later deemed illegal, would the additional evidence be admissible in court? Why or why not? What legal ruling(s) should you be considering?Requirements: In your essay, support your views with the required readings and study materials for this week, or other scholarly sources to support your statements. Four in-text citations are required for this assignment. Your paper must be formatted using 12 pt. Times New Roman font, with a 400-word minimum/425-word maximum double-spaced. (Do not include a Title page or Reference page).Part 2 This week you are presented with the body camera footage from two police officers in two unrelated incidents. Watch and listen to the officers in each incident. Be mindful of possible tactical skills and de-escalation skills that were employed or not exercised. Both incidents ended very differently. Body Camera Footage 1https://www.citizen-times.com/videos/news/local/2018/03/01/apd-chase-beat-man-they-say-jaywalked/110950514/Body Camera Footage 2http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/95090133-132.htmlBefore you write your essay, consider the following definitions and research findings:Police discretion is the flexibility police officers have in deciding between multiple courses of action to resolve a situation in the course of performing their duties. Research identifies several factors that determine whether law enforcement officers decide to enforce or not enforce laws: (1) the officer’s personal feelings regarding the severity of an offense and the potential risk it poses to the public; (2) the specifics of a situation; and (3) supervisor expectations of how officers will carry out their job functions (Ishoy, 2016). Other studies find that if an offender is a resident in the community where the offense occurs, an officer is 18% less likely to arrest the offender, especially if the offender is under the age of 21 or over the age of 51 (McCamman & Mowen, 2017).Use of force is the amount of police effort necessary to get a resistant suspect to comply. Below read the case Graham v. Connor (1989). The United States Supreme Court determined that the Fourth Amendment’s objective reasonableness standard should be the measure used in alleged excessive use of force cases.GRAHAM v. CONNOR, (1989) [http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/490/386.html]All claims that law enforcement officials have used excessive force – deadly or not – in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other “seizure” of a free citizen are properly analyzed under the Fourth Amendment’s “objective reasonableness” standard, rather than under a substantive due process standard.Points of interest from this case:a.If use of force is being questioned, it has to be based on a specific constitutional right infringement. You have to judge this claim of constitutional right infringement by the specific constitutional standard which governs that right. What specific constitutional right is being infringed upon?b.Claims that law enforcement officials have used excessive force in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other “seizure” of a free citizen are most properly characterized as invoking the protections of the Fourth Amendment, which guarantees citizens the right “to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable seizures,” and must be judged by reference to the Fourth Amendment’s “reasonableness” standard.c.The Fourth Amendment must be the guide to judge law enforcement excessive force incidents in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other “seizure” of a free citizen.De-escalation is when officers reduce the intensity of a potentially violent situation. It is the actions of the suspect (their level of cooperation or resistance) that impacts the discretionary powers of the police in deciding how to de-escalate the situation, if possible. Based on the above information, respond to the following questions:1.When comparing Body Camera Footage 1 to Body Camera Footage 2, how does the severity of the crime in each incident compare with the discretionary tactics employed by the officers involved? What biblical principles can you apply to the better approach?2.Discuss whether the suspect in each incident posed an immediate threat to the safety of the officers, himself, or the public. Consider if each suspect was actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight?3.When comparing the two incidents, why do you think one ended more appropriately than the other? 4.Why are non-coercive measures such as conversational requests and directives better than coercive measures?Requirements: In your essay, support your views with the required readings and study materials for this week, or other scholarly sources to support your statements. Four in-text citations are required for this assignment. Your paper must be formatted using 12 pt. Times New Roman font, with a 400-word minimum/425-word maximum double-spaced. (Do not include a Title page or Reference page).Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module/Week 4.Ishoy, G. A., & Dabney, D. A. (2017). Policing and the Focal Concerns Framework: Exploring How its Core Components Apply to the Discretionary Enforcement Decisions of Police Officers. Deviant Behavior, 1-18. doi:10.1080/01639625.2017.1335537McCamman, M. & Mowen, T. (2017). Does residency matter? Local residency as a predictor of arrest, Criminal Justice Studies, DOI: 10.1080/1478601X.2017.1420651

What Is VHDL?What Can Be The Various Uses Of VHDL?Is VHDL Concurrent Or Sequential Language In Nature?What is Synthesis?What is the difference between Entity and Architecture?What is the difference between STD_LOGIC and BIT types?What is the difference between Signal and the Variable?

To create a positive learning environment in any setting , it is important to have a strong set of community values. Please describe a set of community values or central tenets that you believe should guide participants in an online learning community.PS: Talk about respecting each other’s background and ideas.

What Connection Carl Jung’s ideas on the concept of the “shadow” and Midsummer night’s dream darkness?

Examine the role of risk management within the homeland security enterprise. Drawing upon your class readings and additional research, examine how risk management is used by the homeland security enterprise including such efforts as resource/grant allocation, strategic planning, and other homeland security-related initiatives (from the federal level to state and local efforts).Topic 2: Examine the role of cyber-security within the homeland security enterprise. Specifically address how cyber-security relates to our national critical infrastructure and its protection.

1. Discuss impact of the problem. 2. Identify social policies that address the problem. 3. Identify social services that address the problem. 4.what are the roles of private troubles and public issues in contributing to the problem. 5. Identify and discuss stressors in the social environment that contribute to the continuation of the problem. 6. Identify and discuss resources in the social environment that could be used to address the problem. 7. What are the impact of the problem on diverse populations and populations at risk? Provide statistics. 8. What do you think should be done to address the problem.

What are the capabilities and limitations of domestic intelligence efforts in supporting the homeland security enterprise? Do you feel that the U.S. is appropriately structured and resourced to adequately provide timely, accurate and actionable domestic intelligence to support the entire spectrum of intelligence users (customers) from the Federal government down to state and local agencies (both now and into the future)?

White-collar crime refers to offenses committed by workers in the course of their commercial activities. For this case study, use the Internet and/or the Strayer library (https://research.strayer.edu) to research and explore a white-collar crime committed within the last three years. Write a paper in which you address the following thoroughly. Cite specifics from the case wherever possible to support your arguments: 1) Examine three elements of white-collar crime and then determine whether or not the defendant committed a white-collar crime or any action that requires prosecution. Provide a rationale to support your position. 2) Identify and summarize the law which you believe the defendant infringed upon, and identify three of the most significant portions of the law related to this case. Provide support for your rationale. 3) Examine whether the actions of the defendant are supported by others in society and why. If the actions are supported, analyze to what degree they are and analyze the significance of this support. Then, give your opinion as to whether the defendant got the intended outcome as a result of the defendant’s actions. Provide a rationale to support your response. 4) Debate the likelihood of the Department of Justice categorizing the defendant’s behavior as deviant. Next, determine three possible effects on the pursuit of justice if the Justice Department does or does not consider the defendant’s behavior deviant. Justify your response. 5) Use at least three quality academic resources in this assignment.

Describe Racial Disparities In The Judicial System.

am/Policy Planning and Analysis found in the appendix of the Welsh textbook which are Stage 1. Analyzing the Problem (Document the need for change: – Collect and analyze data to define what the problem is, where it is, how big it is, and who is affected by it. What evidence of the problem exists? -Describe the history of the problem: How long has the problem existed? How has it changed over time? Examine potential causes of the problem: What causes the problem? – What theories do we have? The intervention to be chosen must target one or more specific causes supported by research. Examine previous interventions that have tried to change this problem. Identify the most promising interventions and choose a preferred intervention approach. (DARE) E. Identify relevant stakeholders: Do different groups of people have different definitions of the problem? Who is affected by the problem? Conduct a systems analysis: Conduct research on the justice system where the problem exists, and determine how the system may create, contribute to, or maintain the problem. -Identify barriers to change and supports for change: Who is likely to support a certain course of action? Who is likely to resist it?)Stage 2. Setting Goals and Objectives Stage (Write goal statements specifying the general outcome to be obtained. Consider the goals of criminal sanctions and normative values driving desired outcomes.- Write specific outcome objectives for each goal: These should include a time frame for measuring impact, a target population, a key result intended, and a specific criterion or measure of impact.- Seek participation from different individuals and agencies in goal setting. Consider top-down versus bottom-up approaches.- Specify an impact model: This is a description of how the intervention will act upon a specific cause so as to bring about a change in the problem.- Identify compatible and incompatible goals in the larger system: Where do values of different stakeholders overlap or conflict?-Identify needs and opportunities for inter agency collaboration: Whose cooperation and participation is needed to achieve the goals of this program or policy?) 3. Designing the Program or Policy Stage (Choose an intervention approach: Integrate the information collected at previous stages to decide what the substance of an intervention will be. Decide whether a program or policy approach is appropriate.- Program design requires four major activities:- Define the target population: Who is to be served, or changed?) 4. Action Planning Stage (Identify resources needed and make cost projections: How much funding is needed to implement a specific intervention? Identify the kinds of resources needed, estimate costs and make projections, anddevelop a resource plan.- Plan to acquire or reallocate resources: How will funding be acquired? Identify resource providers, and be prepared for making adjustments to the resource plan.) 5. Program/Policy Implementation and Monitoring Stage () 6. Evaluating Outcomes Stage (Decide which type of evaluation is appropriate, and why: Do major stakeholders (including those funding the evaluation) want to know whether the program or policy is achieving its objectives (impact)) 7. Reassessment and Review (Initiate the program or policy design and the action plan developed at Stages 3 and 4: Make sure that specific individuals are responsible for coordinating all program or policy activities.).