Category: Essay Help

Since 2010, law enforcement agencies in America have been using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to locate criminal activity in America. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution deals with search and seizure issues. Americans are generally protected from unreasonable search and seizure without a search warrant having been issued by a magistrate.

Share your responses to the following points:

Define Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and discuss how these vehicles are used by law enforcement agencies.
Identify how drones are used currently and by which agencies.
Discuss how states are reacting to the prospect of using drones to collect evidence.
Explain your opinion on whether a search warrant is required before a drone can be flown over or near private property for the purpose of obtaining evidence of criminal activity.
Discuss the other legitimate uses of drones as a law enforcement resource.

Learning outcomes and assessment criteria specific to this assignment: On completion of the assignment, students should be able to demonstrate their ability to:
1. Critically analyse and evaluate the nature of the relationships between an organisations environment and forces for change.
2. Critically evaluate key issues arising from the management and leadership of change.
3. Critically appraise management and leadership responses in relation to change forces, and emerging organisational dynamics.
4. Structure and communicate ideas and arguments effectively in writing, and reference source materials consistently and accurately using the Harvard referencing system.

1. Assessment Overview
1.1. Overview The Assignment context the competencies that helped the current leaders succeed may not be appropriate for the next generation of leaders. Next generation leaders require different skills, behaviours, and insights for the challenges ahead (Conger 2004) One of the most significant of these challenges will be the necessity to understand change and its underpinning, emergent dynamics in order to lead and manage successful and sustainable organisational change. Many organisations such as CMI, CBI, CIPD conduct and commission research across a range of sectors to help inform effective organisational responses to the opportunities and threats arising from change.

1.2. Assessment Responding to the challenges of change:
a Briefing document This assignment requires you to conduct research, then plan and produce a 3000 word Briefing report Document. As a graduate you are likely to be involved with Briefing documents/papers to support a range of organisational activities, and will see them presented in various formats dependent on the purpose. They are often used within organisations to clearly and concisely present research findings when considering strategic options and choices. Given this purpose they are particularly helpful for contemporary organisations when trying to assess and make sense of strategic opportunities and threats generated by a complex and dynamic mix of both external and internal forces. Building on this feature effective briefing documents can then be used to inform and evaluate appropriate organisational responses in support of sustainable development and change.

2. Assessment Brief
2.1. Required task(s) The Briefing report document for this assignment has three sections and the requirements for each of the sections are introduced below; Section 1 (a) Select and justify an appropriate focus for the Briefing document (i.e. chosen sector/industry etc.). See the notes below offering ideas for shaping a focus. (b) Research and identify the current trends and drivers for change that are influencing and impacting on organisations operating within the chosen sector/industry. (c) Given the trends identified above identify two or three key areas of change that managers/leaders within organisations may be required to work with.

Section 2
Drawing on the key findings of Section1 you are required to apply ideas and theory from appropriate academic sources in order to evaluate how managers/leaders and organisations may respond effectively to key aspects of the organisational dynamics likely to be generated by the areas of change identified.

Section 3
As a conclusion the final section requires you to draw on the evaluation and discussion within the Briefing document to establish the key elements of learning in terms of approaches, skills and qualities etc. for leading/managing sustainable responses to change.

2.2. Word count
The maximum word count is: 3,000 words (+/- 10%). The word limit is for your coursework assignment, and does not cover material submitted as an appendix. Material submitted as an appendix provides background for your coursework, but it will not be marked unless specified in the brief. Also, it is important that you cross-refer between the main text of your assignment and any appendices, in order to demonstrate the linkage, and that the appendices do not constitute additional material unrelated to that included in the body of your assignment. If you do not refer to this work in the Appendix, then this included work in the Appendices are not marked. Your references page will not be included in the word count, but inline citations used in the main body of the assignment (e.g. Smith and Jones (2010) identified that) will be included in the word count. You are required to declare the number of words used in your assignment. If you produce less than or exceed the stipulated word count by more than 10%, a deduction of the mark awarded will be made to reflect that you have not met the assessment requirements.

Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Criterion Score
Introduction
4 points
Disease process, prevalence in the U.S., and disease category(ies) identified.
2 points
Incomplete or incorrect identification of disease process, prevalence in U.S., and/or disease category(ies).
0 points
Disease process, prevalence in U.S., and disease category(ies) not identified.
/ 4
Pathophysiology
8 points
Pathophysiology at organ and system level thoroughly explained.
Connection between pathophysiology and common signs and symptoms thoroughly discussed.
6 points
Pathophysiology at organ and system level partially addressed.
Connection between pathophysiology and common signs and symptoms attempted, but incomplete.
2 points
Pathophysiology at organ and system level missing significant information or absent.
Connection between pathophysiology and common signs and symptoms not included.
/ 8
Pharmacological Interventions: Medication 1
4 points
Thorough description of mechanism of action.
Thorough discussion of common and lethal side effects.
2 points
Partial description of mechanism of action.
Discussion of common and lethal side effects incomplete.
0 points
Mechanism of action not addressed or incorrect.
Common and lethal side effects not addressed.
/ 4
Pharmacological Interventions: Medication 2
4 points
Thorough description of mechanism of action.
Thorough discussion of common and lethal side effects.
2 points
Partial description of mechanism of action.
Discussion of common and lethal side effects incomplete.
0 points
Mechanism of action not addressed or incorrect.
Common and lethal side effects not addressed.
/ 4
Independent Nursing Interventions
4 points
3 to 5 nursing interventions identified.
Each intervention connected to providing care/comfort specific to the identified disease process.
2 points
2 nursing interventions identified.
Nursing interventions partially align with identified disease process.
0 points
Fewer than 2 nursing interventions identified.
Nursing interventions not specific to the identified disease process.
/ 4
Nursing Interventions to Reduce Risk
4 points
3-5 Nursing interventions identified to reduce risk of complications.
Each intervention is directly tied to specific disease process.
2 points
2 Nursing interventions are identified to reduce risk of complications.
Interventions are identified to reduce risk of complications.
Interventions partially align with identified disease process.
0 points
Fewer than 2 nursing interventions identified to reduce risk of complications.
Nursing interventions are not specific to the identified disease process.
/ 4
Conclusion
2 points
Summary cohesively ties paper together.
1 point
Summary does not tie together the main points of the paper.
0 points
Conclusion is missing from the paper.
/ 2
Resources
5 points
1 or more peer-reviewed journal, 2015 or more recent.
One or more resource used in each of section of the body of the paper [Sections 2, 3, 4, 5].
3 points
Incomplete use of resources in the body of the paper [Sections 2, 3, 4, 5].
0 points
No resources included in the body of the paper.
/ 5
APA/Format/Length
5 points
No more than 3 errors in APA formatting.
No more than 3 errors in spelling/grammar.
No more than 5 pages.
3 points
4-6 Errors in APA formatting.
4-6 Errors in spelling/grammar.
No more than 5 pages.
0 points
More than 6 APA formatting errors.
More than 6 errors in spelling/grammar.
More than 5 pages.
/ 5
Rubric Total ScoreTotal

Write a paper with a References List. Your written assignment must follow APA guidelines. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this weeks Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Pocket Guide to APA Style to ensure in-text citations and reference list are correct.

You will synthesize your understanding of why Clintons Health Plan was unsuccessful. Discuss the features of the Clinton health care reform plan and provide reasons why it failed and describe the influence of the various interest groups and governmental entities during this process. Make sure to discuss both the policy process and the policy environmentthat is, the key players involved and other circumstances that shaped this policy-making effort. Consider and discuss the following:

Take a position in support or opposition
Discuss the context of this legislation – name the expected demanders and suppliers as outlined in our textbook, Chapter 3.
Describe the expected interest groups and there specific arguments.
Describe the expected interplay between demanders and suppliers, interest groups and analyze the public policy environment.

Discuss genetic diversity and phylogeography of flare horned makhor in Gilglit Baltistan Pakistan

Write a comparison between Hospital Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator associated pneumonia

Watch one of the videos at https://www.storyofstuff.org/movies. Then, read What Is An Academic Argument?

In either a 1-2 paragraph essay or numbered list form, respond to the prompt below.

Essay Prompt: Answer the questions below. Make sure to use evidence from the video and the article on the topic that you located.

1. What is the argument being presented in the video you chose?

2. What specific visual elements of the video you chose work to support or enhance central claim?

3. Relate three examples (statistics, stories, explanations, definitions, details) that are used by the video to support its argument. (A specific example is something like “According to the video, 33% of Americans buy single-use plastic bottles daily.” A specific example is NOT “Many people buy plastic water bottles.” Because the second sentence uses general terms such as “many people,” it’s a general idea, not a specific example.)

4. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the argument, did the video do a good job of presenting evidence in support of the argument? Why or why not?

no plagiarism please

below is instruction from syllabus:

Essay 3: Discuss the Great Depression and New Deal. Describe the causes and effects of the Depression. Identify and describe several New Deal programs and explain how they were intended to address the crisis. (Use ONLY Outline 3 and any relevant information from the textbook).

*

Discuss the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India.

Explain how the death of Harambe led to where we are today.