Category: Essay Help

Select a case involving conflict between different corporate stakeholders. This case can be from your own experience or research. Cover the following topics: Describe the case, assess how different stakeholders were affected by the case, explain the stakeholder and shareholder positions on corporate responsibility, determine how an adherence to the shareholder view of moral responsibility would resolve the case, determine how an adherence to the stakeholder view of moral responsibility would resolve the case.

Create a company and write a mission and vision statement.

Assignment: Read the two letters from the period of Reconstruction – one from 1865 and one from 1870 – and address ALL of the following questions. The letters are posted on Canvas. Your assignment should be in essay format, with separate paragraphs, full and complete sentences, and free from grammar and spelling errors. It should be approximately 2-3 pages in length, double-spaced. Proofread and edit your paper before submitting. Your paper should be written at a college-appropriate level. What does freedom mean to Jourdan Anderson in 1865? In other words, what things can he (and his family) experience and do now that he is free that he could not do before? Use some specific examples from the letter. What was his life like on the plantation as a slave? What is the overall meaning of his letter? Do you think he was serious? Why do you think he wrote this letter? What do his tone and word choices tell us? According to Albion Tourgee, what is the Ku Klux Klan doing and why? Who are their targets? Be specific and use several clear examples from the letter. Who does Tourgee blame for the KKK’s actions? What is his suggested solution? What does Tourgee fear will happen next? Judging from this letter, do you think the KKK is a large or small organization at this time (in 1870)? Why do you think so? FINALLY, thinking of both of these primary sources, how do we see “freedom” changing in the five years between 1865 and 1870?

Primary Text: Max Shulman’s “Love is a Fallacy” Rhetorical Devices and Literary Devices are Critical Tools to Analyze and Explicate the Play Explication occurs when a writer attempts to clarify or bring meaning to a work of fiction; analysis takes place when writers study the creative process of establishing that meaning. To put it another way: analysis divides something that looks like one thing and breaks it into little things. Explication expands each of the little things by assigning meaning, trying to unite lots of little things underneath one bigger thing. Logos Ethos Pathos Kairos Definition Ethos Pathos Logos Kairos Effective Ineffective Chart Rhetorical Appeals Kairos Questions Literary Devices List 1  (Links to an external site.) Literary Devices List 2  (Links to an external site.) ESSAY 1 PROMPT:  Write a thesis-driven, well-organized, 4-5 page essay to provide a rhetorical and literary analysis of one character from Max Shulman’s “Love is a Fallacy.” You will analyze your character of choice (unnamed main character; Polly Espy; or Petey Bellows) using rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos, kairos. Also, you will analyze your same character of choice (unnamed main character; Polly Espy; or Petey Bellows) using literary devices. Literary device suggestions for analysis of any character: symbolism, metaphor, irony, logical fallacies, and verisimilitude – note: I would like to choose the main character.  Provide two pieces of textual evidence (variations between direct quotes and paraphrases) in each paragraph to support your claim in proper MLA in-text citation. Your essay must contain at least five body paragraphs. Review Essay 1 Outline format on how to generate content for body paragraph 1. In body paragraphs #2, 3, 4, 5: you must feature one rhetorical device and one literary device analysis.   Your thesis statement (main claim) must address: What rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos, kairos) and literary devices (select 4-5 of your choice) does the writer employ to effectively render your selected character?  How does the play use your selected character as a vehicle (conduit, platform, device) to comment on love, logic, gender, money, sexism, and/or fads?  FORMAT:  Your essay should follow proper MLA formatting, MLA in-text citations, and MLA Works Cited page. Use Times New Roman 12, 1 inch margins all around.  Any essay turned in without appropriate citations will NOT receive a grade.  Keep turnitin.com “quoting matches” below 20%. “Quoting matches” above 30% WITHOUT a strong thesis statement = in danger of automatic fail.   2) Outline Introduction Paragraph Hook statement: avoid quotes, play summary, obvious statement of facts, and rhetorical questions.  Background / contextual information: What is the play’s argument?  What is the play’s commentary on love, logic, gender, money, sexism, and/or fads?  Declare which Character you will analyze: What is your character’s argument? The play’s argument should not overlap with your character’s argument.  What does your character represent in the world of the play (literary world) -vs.- what does your character metaphorically represent outside the world of the play (our real world)? Thesis Statement: Your thesis statement (main claim) must address: What rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos, kairos) and literary devices (select 4-5 of your choice) does the writer employ to effectively render your selected character?  How does the play use your selected character as a vehicle (conduit, platform, device) to comment on love, logic, gender, money, sexism, and/or fads?  Transition sentence after thesis statement. Do not end your introduction paragraph with your thesis.  Body Paragraph 1 = Character analysis = overview What is your selected character (unnamed main character; or Polly Espy; or Petey Bellows)  truth, epiphany, paralysis, challenges?  What does your selected character represent in the world of the play? What does your selected character metaphorically represent beyond the world of the play (in the real world)? Character analysis: Is your selected character flat, round, stock, stereotypical, static, dynamic? How do they contribute to the plot’s movement? How do they contribute to the play’s theme? Body Paragraph 2 = Rhetorical Analysis = Ethos + Character analysis via literary device #1 (use a different literary device per body paragraph)  Literary Devices Links: https://literary-devices.com https://literarydevices.net Topic Sentence (TS) Format = “Shulman employs (uses, utilizes, wields) ethos (effectively -or- ineffectively) because … [why? // insert a specific reason] How does Shulman use literary device #1 to effectively -or- ineffectively employ ethos?  Provide a specific scene as evidence  Body Paragraph 3 = Rhetorical Analysis = Pathos + Character analysis via another literary device #2 Topic Sentence (TS) Format = “Shulman employs (uses, utilizes, wields) pathos (effectively -or- ineffectively) because … [why? // insert a specific reason] How does Shulman use literary device #2 to effectively -or- ineffectively employ pathos?  Provide a specific scene as evidence  Body Paragraph 4 = Rhetorical Analysis = Logos + Character analysis via another literary device #3 Topic Sentence (TS) Format = “Shulman employs (uses, utilizes, wields) logos (effectively -or- ineffectively) because … [why? // insert a specific reason] How does Shulman use literary device #3 literary device to effectively -or- ineffectively employ logos?  Provide a specific scene as evidence  Body Paragraph 5 = Rhetorical Analysis = Kairos + Character analysis via another literary device #4 Topic Sentence (TS) Format = “Shulman employs (uses, utilizes, wields) kairos (effectively -or- ineffectively) because … [why? // insert a specific reason] How does Shulman use literary device #4 to effectively -or- ineffectively employ kairos?  Provide a specific scene as evidence  Conclusion Paragraph  Your conclusion paragraph must include two distinct and specific parts: A) the 1st half of your conclusion paragraph: recap essay quickly; review thesis with fresh words B) the 2nd half of your conclusion paragraph: provide insight; concrete micro and macro call to action = -mirco (local) realistic: How does the moral of the play and the understanding of your selected character affect an individual reader? -vs.- How does the perspective of your character impact a small group of people’s understanding of love, logic, gender, money, sexism, and/or fads? -macro (global) idealistic: How does the moral of the play and the understanding of your selected character affect a large group of readers? -vs.- How does the perspective of your character impact various communities’s understanding of love, logic, gender, money, sexism, and/or fads? A) the 1st half of your conclusion paragraph: ads

In this assignment, you are to use the same corporation you selected and focused on for Assignment 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness and Assignment 2: External and Internal Environments. Research the company on its own website, the public filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR database, the University’s online databases, the Nexis Uni database, and any other sources you can find. The annual report will often provide insights that can help address some of these questions. Requirements Write a six- to eight-page paper in which you do the following: Analyze the business-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the business-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion. Analyze the corporate-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the corporate-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion. Analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporation’s most significant competitor. Compare their strategies at each level and evaluate which company you think is most likely to be successful in the long term. Justify your choice. Determine whether your choice from Question 3 would differ in slow-cycle and fast-cycle markets. Use at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not quality as academic resources.  Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.  Use the Assignment 3 Template [DOC] to ensure that your assignment meets the above requirements. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows: Determine business-level and corporate-level strategies for a corporation’s long-term success comparable to the competitive environment.

This assignment is the first step in a three part project. You only need to focus on part one at this point. Each step will build on earlier steps. However, it is not a matter of providing a rough draft of all or even part of the entire project here in week three. That is, further steps might require completely new and original text. At the same time, completing each step will aid you in completing a future step or future steps. And, you should use the same topic in all steps. First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia, the death penalty, abortion, cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here. Next, detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct. Now, we want to evaluate these positions using the moral theories we studied this week: What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action. What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action. Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code.

1. A summary of the documentary: what is the main theme? What are the theory he presents and what evidence (more than one) does he use to support it? 2. What is the argument about the henge in modern Turkey (Gobekli Tepe)? 3. What particular part of the documentary did you find most interesting? Why?  4. Any other comments you would like to include. https://youtu.be/eQWKpKbvc9M this is the video and this is the source.

How Has Electronic Prescribing Increased Patient Care?

Discussion prompts are posted under the “Discussions” tab. You must start a new thread to respond to the prompt. Responses to each question within a prompt must be at least 150 words in length. Also, you must respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts on the thread. Discussion posts and peer responses are always due on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. (EST). In Theories of General War, you have reviewed many theories of international war. Which theory do you like most and why? Can you apply any theory to explain the ongoing U.S.-China trade war?  What is your reflection on the biological theory of aggression? Do you see any limitation of this theory?    What’s your overall ‘take-away’ from the discussion on war (Chapter 1) in Approaches to Peace?

This reaction paper will reflect student understanding of the following SLO: Demonstrate proficiency in critical thinking by evaluating the impact of training and development / performance management on a company’s culture and bottom line What to Do in a Reaction Paper Research the topic thoroughly and ensure read the material you find very carefully: (web site; current event, news story, textbook, and etc.) Think about and evaluate what the impact of training and development / performance management on a company’s culture and bottom line Do not just summarize what you read – provide thoughtful professional opinions on the topic (this should be a response or reply not simply a rehashing of what the original author is saying!) Think about 1 or 2 major points you want to articulate in your reaction paper and define those clearly (normally one argument per one paragraph) Describe your point first (“Lessons Learned,” “What you agreed on…” or “What you disagreed on…”) Justify why you think that way Provide real-world examples or evidence – you may use any example you are familiar with (including examples we discussed in class or from the textbook) Do not assume the reader automatically knows what you are talking about when you mention a name or theory (i.e. Enron or Wal-Mart) Provide sufficient background information and explain how your examples support your argument and reinforces your point of view Provide how your points relate to Human Resources / Organizational Behavior / the impact of training and development / performance management on a company’s culture and bottom line Include a conclusive statement at the end after you finish articulating all the points Include a works cited section for all sources used within the research paper Points will be based upon the student’s ability to demonstrate proficiency in critical thinking by evaluating the impact of conflicts on organizational effectiveness. It is important to express your thoughts clearly and have a focused well-honed thesis. Since this is a “reaction paper”, students should include an abundance of reactions / personal perspectives that reflect their thoughts. Treat this as if it were a professional document. That means it must be presentable and coherent – please proofread your reaction paper carefully and check for diction, syntax, grammar, typos, and etc. LINK TO ONLINE TEXTBOOK: https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/ Username: collinleary@gmail.com Password: Vitalsource123! The book is Human Resource management, the chapter we need to report on is Chapter 8, starting on page 208