Write a research paper on Law7.

Assuming Mayo is found guilty at trial, the most appropriate sentence from the standpoint of a prosecutor would be a lengthy prison sentence, such as a life sentence without parole. This can be attributed to how prosecuting attorneys often attempt to convince the judge that an accused befits a severe punishment for the crime committed. On the other hand, the defense attorney representing Mayo would argue for a more lenient sentence, such as imprisonment for a term of not more than 30 years with parole. A defense attorney serves the interests of the client, and arguing for a more lenient sentence is key. It can be argued that there would be a mandatory minimum sentence at issue in this case. A mandatory-minimum sentence affects broad categories of crimes, including repeat offenders and many drug crimes. Some cases of mandatory-minimum sentencing target offenses committed while possessing or using deadly weapons. Mayo’s case involved the use of a deadly weapon, the gun. Using mandatory sentencing guidelines ensure fair sentencing for crimes for the guilty since they help guarantee that defendants, especially those who commit similar crimes as well as have similar criminal backgrounds, receive similar sentences (Warner et al., 2018). I believe that there is an appealable issue for Mayo’s attorney to file. Stand your ground law entitles a person to the right of self-defense, such as through the use of deadly force. In the appeal, it will make sense to argue that Mayo believed that such force was necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm based on the circumstances permitted under stand your ground law (Thomson Reuters, 2019). Under the circumstances permitted according to stand your ground law, using deadly force may be unjustified if the person retreats or stops a threatening behavior. Mayo was justified in standing his ground; he did not have to try to get away before resorting to reasonable, even deadly force (Fair, 2014).   Referencee Fair, M. (2014). Dare defend: Standing for stand your ground. Law and Psychology Review, 38, 153. Lawrence, A. (2015, June). Making sense of sentencing: State systems and policies. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures. Prince, J., & Thompson, A. (2015). The inalienable right to stand your ground. St. Thomas Law Review, 27(1), 32. Thomson Reuters. (2019). North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 14. Criminal Law § 14-51.3. Use of force in defense of person; relief from criminal or civil liability. Retrieved from https://codes.findlaw.com/nc/chapter-14-criminal-law/nc-gen-st-sect-14-51-3.html

Discuss George and Martha’s behavior from the perspective of the various theories of communication that we have discussed in class (IST, URT, Relational Control Theory, family myth readings).

I will explain the assignment in much details as possible, but please contact me for any clarification.  This is two separate assignment. 3 pages addresses a question and the other 3 pages another question. The resources for the first part are the Interplay chapters and the Film Who is Afraid of Virginia Wolf and Watzlawick article. The movie could be rented many sites, I will pay the fee. It is $1.99 here is a link to Amazon, but you can use any other; https://www.amazon.com/Afraid-Virginia-Woolf-Elizabeth-Taylor/dp/B0012NO316/ref=tmm_aiv_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= Here the professor instructions: The answers for questions 1 and 2 should each be no more than 3 pages (using standard margins, Courier font, 12-point, double-spaced), for a maximum total of 6 pages.   (3 pages max) — 1. In the Interplay chapters (13th edition) on Listening (Chap 7), Emotions (Chap 8), Communication in Close Relationships (Chap 10), and Managing Conflict (Chap 12), various aspects of relationships are discussed. Analyze George and Martha’s relationship and communication from the perspective of each of these chapters. Reference specific ideas and research from the chapters whenever possible.  And be aware that some chapters have more relevant information than others.  Do not just mention a couple of points from each chapter–think about what is relevant to understanding the interactions in the film in each chapter. (3 pages max)  —  2. Discuss George and Martha’s behavior from the perspective of the various theories of communication that we have discussed in class (IST, URT, Relational Control Theory, family myth readings). How do each of the theories apply? Which theory makes the best explanation of George and Martha’s behavior? Explain why. Make specific reference to the readings and lectures on these topics whenever possible.

Discuss how the Risk-Needs Assessment (RNA) is used in making determinations about granting bail.

You are an attorney who represents Joey Maltese. Joey has been charged with six counts of tax fraud and six counts of tax evasion, embezzlement, and conspiracy to commit murder. The prosecutors in Joey’s case contend that Joey poses a threat to public safety. They filed a motion seeking to have Joey held without granting bail pending trial. You conduct a little legal research as follows to see if prosecutors will be successful on their motion: Please read the Syllabus portion of United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987); https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/481/739. Pay particular attention to the Bail Reform Act of 1984. Discuss its provisions. Discuss how the Risk-Needs Assessment (RNA) is used in making determinations about granting bail. Lay out the factors that work for or against Joey. In other words, create a fictional actuarial instrument for your client based on objective criteria. Discuss, too, how much risk Joey poses to the community. Please read the following article as well, which will also help you in preparing your analysis: https://www.ca.gov/archive/gov39/2018/08/28/governor-brown-signs-legislation-to-revamp-californias-bail-system-protect-public-safety/index.html Explain what the U.S. Supreme Court said in United States v. Salerno regarding whether the Eighth Amendment requires release on bail.

Evaluate the controls needed for securing the system/application domain.

The learning outcome for this unit involves the process of developing an information system (IS) compliance audit plan for an organization. There are many factors involved in this process including examining the requirements, developing a plan, creating documentation, and anticipating corrective measures. All these considerations are brought together and addressed in this assignment. Assume you are in charge of an anticipated IT compliance audit for the system/application domain. The chief information officer (CIO) wants to be prepared and asks you to create a plan. Address the following in your plan: Explain the information security systems requirements for securing the system/application domain. Evaluate the controls needed for securing the system/application domain. Develop the compliance requirements for the system/application domain. Describe the general procedures and best practices for system/application domain compliance. Summarize potential corrective measures for audit findings in the system/application domain.