Category: Essay Help

The class is Business Law Your score on this assignment will be based on the following: The depth of understanding you display Citation to reliable authority to support your comments – NOTE: Wikipedia is NOT an acceptable source due to the fact that it can be changed by almost anyone with a computer. Cites to Wikipedia will not count toward the required citation to authority in Biz Law Talk! The accuracy of your cites Your writing skills REMEMBER: It is not enough to just state your opinion on the topics discussed in Biz Law Talk. Instead, your opinion must be supported by citation to reliable authority. Examples of reliable authority include your textbook and sites such as www.findlaw.com. Failure to cite authority will adversely affect your grade for Biz Law Talk. Here is a site that you may find helpful in drafting well-reasoned comments: http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/irac.html

I need an expansion on a critical analyst as my final exam. I did not do well for the first part. I will put my teachers notes in this section. I will also put screenshots of her feedback in the additional material section. She wants 5 pages and has provided 2 pages of instructions for us. TEACHERS FEEDBACK “You are off to a strong start with your ideas here. Ok, the ideas here can work, but you must present a debatable thesis statement. What are you attempting to prove? The ideas here function more as summary because they focus solely on the literature. The literature is the evidence for your argument. The goal here is to move beyond the literature to create analysis (what do character actions and behaviors reveal and mean?). Right now, the thesis statement needs work to be more specific to name the risk your argument seeks to prove about undocumented immigrants. I have a few ideas to help strengthen your overall argument. The thesis needs more specificity, especially with naming the subject, but it can definitely work since you have already identified aspects of imagery and irony. Use the Introduction to explore the subject of your essay. Move beyond the literature to state the larger subject. Look to the body paragraphs to identify the aspects. Expand the body paragraphs to explore each aspect. What is the impact? Develop a specific thesis statement that states what you plan to argue, how (specific aspects) and why ( significance). Each body paragraph should work to reinforce the overall argument.

Pick one of the following two options: Option 1: Social engineering attacks typically involve some form of psychological manipulation, fooling otherwise unsuspecting users or employees into handing over confidential or sensitive data. Commonly, social engineering involves email or other communication that invokes urgency, fear, or similar emotions in the victim, leading the victim to promptly reveal sensitive information, click a malicious link, or open a malicious file. Because social engineering involves a human element, preventing these attacks can be tricky for enterprises. Describe the most effective example of social engineering you have seen in your personal or professional life. Option 2: Discuss a specific technical or legal challenge when sniffing network traffic during a pentest. Comment on at least one other student post by explaining how you would get around it. Keep in mind the Grading Criteria (Writing Competency, Thinking Skills, and Positive and Timely Interaction) as seen in the rubric: Discussion Rubric Click for more options Discussion Rubric – Alternative Formats – Word Document (11 KB)

Scenario You have been contracted to conduct a penetration test of a medium-sized DoD contractor with offices in San Diego and Washington, DC. The organization has 75 employees. They mostly use Windows with a few Linux servers. All of their IT infrastructures are hosted on-premise. Social engineering is authorized. Penetration Testing Frameworks Explore one of the two pentest frameworks listed below. Penetration Testing Execution Standard (http://www.pentest-standard.org/index.php/Main_Page) Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual (OSSTMM) (http://www.pen-tests.com/open-source-security-testing-methodology-manual-osstmm.html) Write a paper that: Describes the framework and how it can be used. OR Discuss how you would use the pentest framework to conduct a penetration test of an organization based on the scenario below. For example, discuss some of the tools and methods listed here (http://www.pentest-standard.org/index.php/PTES_Technical_Guidelines#Intelligence_Gathering) that you would use to gather OSIINT on the target. Submission Requirements Submit as a Word document in this format: No cover/title page – just use a heading at the top of the page which has Course #/Title, Assignment Title (e.g., Week Four Writing Assignment), your name, and date 1-inch margins Single-spaced Standard font (e.g., Arial, Calibri, Times Roman) 12-pt font size only Page length: 5-8 pages APA format as demonstrated in this example: Apa_example_sixth_edition – Word Document (28 KB) Please use the following Grading Rubric for this assignment: Written Assignment Rubric – Word Document (48 KB)

1: Terrorism is one kind of warfare. Therefore it can be also a category of cyber warfare. The Stuxnet virus/worm attack on the Iranian nuclear facility is a good example of a cyber weapon. Describe another use of a cyber weapon that involved malware or system hacking and explain what you think the terrorists were hoping to accomplish. Were they successful? Explain to what degree or how they failed in their attempt. Option 2: Post at least one tip on any tool that can be used for scanning or enumeration during a pentest (penetration testing) that might be useful to the class. Don’t repeat other tips but you can amplify previously posted tips. Post any questions you have on a pentest tool. If you correctly answer a question, that will count as your tip.

A 4-8 panel demon, using Lynda Barrys One! Hundred! Demons!(https://ares-its.ocad.ca/ares//ares.dll?SessionID=X021725127C&Action=10&Type=10&Value=12318) or Maia Kobabe’s Gender Queer(https://ares-its.ocad.ca/ares//ares.dll?SessionID=X021725127C&Action=10&Type=10&Value=12319) as an example. -Storytelling techniques – Formal elements – Emotional experience of reading Which discusses your experience of reading your selected author’s autography, and your experience of creating your own. This must refer specifically to moments in the inspiration text and be cited correctly using MLA, both in text and in the works cited. This should not be a summary or overview, but instead a deep look into some aspect of the text that inspired you. Rubric: Autography Content: Does the student use a course author’s work as a jumping off point to tell an interesting story? Does the work engage with the limits and possibilities of autography? (/5) Reflection: Does the reflection indicate that the student gave deep thought to the process of encountering someone else’s demons and to creating their own? Is this more than a superficial reporting of “what happened” but rather a narrative about the emotional experience of reading/ creating autography? Does the student engage closely and carefully with an author’s work, referring to specific moments in the text?

There are significant legal and ethical implications associated with penetration testing. A significant amount of trust is placed on penetration testers, which means they must always act in an ethical manner. Review the material below and write an essay on the ethical conduct required of ethical hackers and penetration testers. The essay should discuss: Why ethics are important The impact of unethical behavior for the cybersecurity industry The ethical aspects of preventing fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) Potential References Potential References Penetration Testing Professional Ethics: a conceptual model and taxonomy – PDF (135 KB) EC-Council Code of Ethics – PDF (1.42 MB) GIAC Code of Ethics (https://pen-testing.sans.org/certification/ethics) Submission.

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice. This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s). In each week’s entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below. In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission. New practice approaches Interprofessional collaboration Health care delivery and clinical systems Ethical considerations in health care Practices of culturally sensitive care Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients Population health concerns The role of technology in improving health care outcomes Health policy Leadership and economic models Health disparities.

For this blog assignment, you will do two main tasks: 1) Write about the company you select for your project, explaining why you chose that company, and 2) think of a new product your chosen company could launch. It can be anything, so do not limit your ideas, because you do not have to justify your new product idea, just explain how you would do market research for it.

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice. Develop a written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal: Background Clinical problem statement. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system. PICOT question. Literature search strategy employed. Evaluation of the literature. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created. Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Question Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review.