Are fictional scientists usually the heroes, villains, or a combination of the two?

For the Unit 9 Assignment, you will complete a reflective essay to address the following questions: When you hear the word “scientist” what do you envision? Discuss at least three characteristics of your vision of a scientist. Which famous people or characters from the media come into your mind? What characteristics do they have in common? Has your image of what a scientist does and how they look changed over time? If so, how has this changed and what influenced you? Are fictional scientists usually the heroes, villains, or a combination of the two? Provide at least two detailed examples to support your position. How is science portrayed in fictional media (i.e., television shows, movies, music, books, etc.)? Is it seen as a positive, negative, or neutral force in the world? Give specific examples supporting your position. Do you think the portrayal of scientists in the various forms of media influences how society views people in this profession? Why, or why not? Can the portrayal of science in media influence how certain research and technology is viewed and accepted by the general public (e.g., cloning)? Read this resource from the Writing Center on how to write a reflective essay: https://campus2.purdueglobal.edu/article/reflective-writing

Were there scenes/actors that stood out as strong or weak?

In your papers you are to address: The Acting: Start with Did you Believe It? Was the acting effective? Were there scenes/actors that stood out as strong or weak? How about specific moments that worked well or didn’t work? How and Why? You must use terminology from class such as GOTE, Beats, Given circumstances etc throughout your entire paper. Don’t summarize the plot, talk about the Given Circumstances that influenced the performances. It is strongly advised that you take notes during the show Pick one fro below: Joker – Joaquin Phoenix (Joker ) 2019 A star is born- Lady gaga 2019

Describe the current basis for tax exemption for non-for-profit healthcare firms.

1. Describe the current basis for tax exemption for non-for-profit healthcare firms.
2. What are the relative community benefits provided by proprietary and not-for-profit hospitals?
3. What are (and describe) the basic methods of payment for healthcare firms?
4. Discuss some of the important considerations when negotiating a health plan contract.
Quality of posts
• Each of your posts (original posts & replies) must demonstrate your understanding of the topic.
• Post should show connections between lecture content, textbook content, and discussion.
• Relate new information with material previously covered in the class as well as with personal experience.
• Discuss at a critical level – don’t just recite facts from your reading, discussion, or lecture.
• Critical discussion includes your opinion of items mentioned, but also includes the reasons you hold that opinion, and why it may be inconsistent or consistent with what you’ve learned. Justify your reasoning with facts. How does what you’re presenting affect present and future situations?

Discuss The Impact of Innovation.

Write a 260- to 350-word article that reviews a recent innovation in health care and its impact on existing systems (e.g., first- and second-movers, wearables, printed organs, genetic testing). Include a citation of your article in your assignment. Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).

Presentation:Discuss “Biggest Challenges Facing Organizations in the Next 20 Years”

In this assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that outlines what you believe will be the biggest challenges facing organizations in the next 20 years. Write an eight (8) slide presentation in which you: Provide a title slide (as indicated in the format requirements below) followed by a slide with an introduction to your presentation. Presentation should include your choice of the five (5) challenges you believe organizations will face in the next 20 years. Only include one (1) challenge and your explanation for choosing that challenge per slide for a total of five (5) slides. Provide one (1) summary slide which addresses key points of your paper. Provide notes on each slide, indicating what you would say if you were actually presenting in front of an audience. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. Format the PowerPoint presentation with headings on each slide and three to four (3-4) relevant graphics (photographs, graphs, clip art, etc.), ensuring that the presentation is visually appealing and readable from 18 feet away. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a title slide containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.

Demonstrate written communication skills by using complete paragraphs, accurate grammar, and proper mechanics.

Chapter 2 was about moral reasoning in criminal justice under the idealistic and pragmatic models. Chapter 3 was about legal philosophy under the idealistic and pragmatic models. Let’s put these things together using a federal court case that considers society’s right to make rules versus people’s right to direct their children’s activities:AANR-East [American Association for Nude Recreation–Eastern Region, Inc.] is one of several recreational organizations affiliated with the American Association for Nude Recreation, a national social nudism organization. In June 2003, AANR-East opened a week-long juvenile [kids] nudist camp at a licensed nudist campground operated by White Tail near Ivor, Virginia. AANR-East leased the 45-acre campground that ordinarily attracts about 1,000 weekend visitors who come to engage in nude recreation and interact with other individuals and families who practice social nudism ….Modeled after juvenile nudist summer camps operated annually in Arizona and Florida by other regional divisions of AANR, the 2003 AANR-East summer camp offered two programs: a “Youth Camp” for children 11 to 15 years old, and a “Leadership Academy” for children 15 to 18 years old. The camp agenda included traditional activities such as arts and crafts, campfire sing-alongs, swimming, and sports. The camp also included an educational component designed to teach the values associated with social nudism through topics such as “Nudity and the Law,” “Overcoming the Clothing Experience,” “Puberty Rights Versus Puberty Wrongs,” and “Nudism and Faith.” A total of 32 campers attended the 2003 summer camp [and AANR-East planned to operate the camp the subsequent year].Prior to the scheduled start of AANR-East’s [next] youth camp, the Virginia General Assembly amended the statute governing the licensing of summer camps specifically to address youth nudist camps. The amended statute requires a parent, grandparent, or guardian to accompany any juvenile who attends a nudist summer camp.White Tail Park v. Stroube (2005) (p. 455) (taken from the end of Chapter 3’s “Criminal Justice Problem Solving” inset)Before this new law, there was no requirement that guardians accompany their children at nudist camps. AANR-East, White Tail, and three sets of parents sued Robert B. Stroube, Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Health (responsible for issuing the licenses). The complaint stated that the new law violates parents’ rights to raise their children how they see fit. In other words, the complaint alleges that parents should have the right to send their children to a properly licensed nudist summer camp without having to accompany them.Step 1. Post your response with the following: Take a side in this court case, and justify your position using key terms and concepts from Chapters 2 and 3. Hint: You can find a list of key terms and concepts on the first page of each chapter. To support your analysis, use at least one moral reasoning concept/perspective from Chapter 2 and at least one legal philosophy from Chapter 3. Demonstrate written communication skills by using complete paragraphs, accurate grammar, and proper mechanics. Your original post should be a minimum of 300 words.Key Terms:Social contract theoryLegitimacyStrategyTacticsA priori reasoningDataEmpiricismParadigmsIdealistPragmatistLegal principleRulesSix concepts of lawHart-devlin debateWolfenden reportLegal moralismCollective judgementHarm principleLegal positivismJurisprudenceIdealistic theories of lawLegal naturalismNatural lawCritical theories of lawLegal paternalismLegal pragmatismLegal realism

Analyze your two chosen artifacts.

Now that you have chosen your artifacts and identified the common theme, you will develop a draft of your exploration document. Analyze your two chosen artifacts. Then, identify a common theme and compare your examples to one another as expressions of the same theme in different cultural artifacts. To document your analysis and research, you will develop a reference list. In preparation for the presentation you will develop in the final two modules of the course, you will also consider how you would present your research to a specific audience.