Describe the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report, ″Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.″Outline the four ″Key Messages″ that structure the IOM Report recommendations.

Review the IOM report, ″The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,″ and explore the ″Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition″ website. In a 1,150 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession.Include the following:Describe the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report, ″Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.″Outline the four ″Key Messages″ that structure the IOM Report recommendations. Explain how these have transformed or influenced nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development. Provide examples.Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the IOM report, ″Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.″Research the initiatives on which your state′s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state′s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession.Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers.You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style RUBRICS:Content80.0Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work and IOM Report10.0A desсrіption of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is omitted.An incomplete desсrіption of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.A summary of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are inaccuracies or misinterpretations.A desсrіption of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented. There are slight inaccuracies.A clear and accurate desсrіption of the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report is presented.Key Messages Transforming Nursing15.0The four key messages are omitted.Fewer than four key messages are presented, and the messages contain inaccuracies. An incomplete discussion on how they transformed nursing is presented.The four key messages that structure the IOM report are generally outlined. A summary of how these transformed some aspects of nursing is presented, but there are some inaccuracies.The four key messages that structure the IOM report are outlined. A desсrіption of how these transformed key aspects of nursing is presented.The four key messages that structure the IOM report are clearly outlined. A desсrіption of how these transformed nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development are thoroughly discussed.State-Based Action Coalitions and Their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report15.0The role of state-based action coalitions is omitted.The role of state-based action coalitions is incomplete. It is unclear how these advance the goals in the IOM report.The role of state-based action coalitions is summarized. A summary of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.The role of state-based action coalitions is discussed. A discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.The role of state-based action coalitions is thoroughly discussed. A detailed and accurate discussion of how they help advance the goals in the IOM report is presented.State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession20.0Initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are omitted.Only one initiative spearheaded by a state action coalition is presented. The narrative contains omissions and inaccuracies. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are incomplete.Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition are summarized. How these initiatives advance the nursing profession are generally discussed. There are some inaccuracies.Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are discussed.Two initiatives spearheaded by a state action coalition and how they advance the nursing profession are thoroughly discussed. The discussion demonstrates a clear understanding of the state action committee and the role in advancing the nursing profession.Barriers to Advancement20.0Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are omitted. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is omitted.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are unclear. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is incomplete.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are presented. How nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers is summarized. There are inaccuracies, or more information is needed.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are described.Barriers to advancement that currently exist in the state are thoroughly explored and how nursing advocates in the state overcome barriers are thoroughly described.Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is desсrіptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

What was his argument-purpose of the child saving movement?

base on the Anthony Platt: the triumph of benevolence1.What was his argument-purpose of the child saving movement?2.Makes a composition between the child saving movement and industrialist3.What were the prevailing myths (three) of this movement? 4.What were some of the motivations (during the 1800s) for this movement?5.Who was responsible for crime at the time?6.Medical model what is it?7.What was the purpose of the juvenile court?8.Was this a positive change?9.Policy implications for today

Who governs America?

Who governs America? Discuss the four theories (pluralist, elite, bureaucratic, social movement). Which theory do you agree with? Why?

Describe your personal insight into what you learned in the Basic Leader Course.

1. Describe your personal insight into what you learned in the Basic Leader Course. 2. Describe the NCO 2020 Strategy using your personal experience and future leadership expectations.Essay Requirements: Length: 500 – 750 words Font: Arial, 12 pt. Spacing: 2.0 (double) Margins: Standard (1 inch all around), do not justify right margins Write in first person Use the Army writing styleGraphic.ESSAY 1 Think about the topics covered throughout the course. Reflectively express why these topics are important to you and how you will implement what you learned from BLC when you return to your unit. Describe the possible obstacles or barriers to your implementation of what you learned and how you will overcome the obstacles or barriers. Essay should contain between 500 and 750 words and be written in the first-person narrative.

Discuss frequency, distribution and graphs.

Here’s the instructions for measures A and B:Measure A must be a nominal measure with 3 categories containing a total of at least 10 observations (data points). At least one of the categories must require an operational definition. So you need to 1) choose a measure, 2) define your categories, 3) count the number of items in each category, 4) record this information.You could use articles of clothing (what is the operational definition of a sweater?), items in your pantry (herbs, spices, seasonings – operationally define at least one of those), kitchen items, grooming items/products. The objective of this part of the exercise is to engage your thinking with the process of clearly defining categories. Remember: you need to make sure that the definitions prevent any item from fitting into more than one category. I’ve provided basic tables for reporting the raw data, but you’ll be using this data for next week’s exercise in data presentation by tables and graphs.

How would the board’s increased involvement in the selection of strategies affect a firm’s strategic competitiveness?

Top executives and members of a corporation’s board of directors have different roles and responsibilities. Traditionally, executives have been responsible for determining the firm’s strategic direction and implementing strategies to achieve it, whereas the board of directors has been responsible for monitoring and controlling managerial decisions and actions. Some argue that boards should become more involved with the formulation of a firm’s strategies. How would the board’s increased involvement in the selection of strategies affect a firm’s strategic competitiveness? What evidence you offer to support their position?

Do the ideas of the 1960s still have relevance today?

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 28, 29, 30 Lesson Minimum of 1 primary source Minimum of 4 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook) Optional Resources to Explore Feel free to review the library guide for scholarly sources and videos at the following link: Link (website): History Library Guide (Links to an external site.) Introduction The purposes of each case study assignment include the following: To hone your abilities to research using scholarly sources To advance critical thinking and writing skills To compile a response to the prompts provided To explore a historical topic and make connections to change over time Instructions Pick one (1) of the following topics. Then, address the corresponding questions/prompts for your selected topic. Use at least one (1) documented example of the corresponding primary source in your writing. Option 1: McCarthyism and Anti-Communist Campaigns The Cold War brought about an irrational fear of communism and communist activities in the United States. As we are learning this week, one of the most vocal instigators of this paranoia was Senator Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy delivered a speech about the imminent threat of communism on February 9, 1950. Perform a search on the internet and locate and read Joseph McCarthy’s speech given in Wheeling, West Virginia on February 9, 1950. Copy and paste the following keywords into your Google search bar: “Joseph McCarthy, Wheeling, West Virginia.” The speech is also referred to as “Enemies from Within.” Construct the case study by responding to the following prompts: Explain how Senator Joseph McCarthy defined communist nations within the speech. What specific threats did these nations pose? Assess if Senator Joseph McCarthy charges were accurate. Analyze anti-communist sentiments during the Cold War era, were these sentiments valid. If so, how? If not, why not? Explain if there are other examples of events similar to the Red Scare that have occurred throughout history and modern day. Examine what happened to people who invoked the Fifth Amendment, refused to appear or were found in violation of the law as defined by the Congressional Committee. Option 2: The Civil Rights Movement Using the Internet, locate and read Martin Luther King Jr’s “I Have a Dream” speech given in Washington D.C., August 1963. Copy and paste the following keywords into your Google search bar: “I Have a Dream by Martin Luther King, Jr.” Feel free also to locate and incorporate additional scholarly sources to respond to this case study, including information on the Civil Rights Movement. Construct the case study by responding to the following prompts: Explain if the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s effectively changed the nation. What effect would the Civil Rights Acts have across the continent on minority groups? Do you think that the tactics and strategies that civil rights activists used in the 1960s would apply to today’s racial and ethnic conflicts? Why or why not? Do the ideas of the 1960s still have relevance today? If so how? If not, why not? Analyze how the Civil Rights Movement would impact diversity in America today. Option 3: American Domestic and Foreign Policies (1953-1991) Complete a search either in the Chamberlain Library or internet for domestic and foreign polices of four (4) of the following Presidents. Please incorporate at least one primary source of either a policy or act that you have chosen to write about. Eisenhower Kennedy Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Reagan Then, compare domestic and foreign polices of your four (4) presidents by answering the following prompts: Explain how your selected presidents worked to improve the United States economically and socially. Give at least one example of each president. Assess if the policies of your choice of presidents strengthen or weaken the United States. Explain how you see your choice of presidents served the public interest and further the cause of democracy. Determine if it is constitutional for the United States to fight preemptive wars. Determine if human rights and morality should be the cornerstones of United State foreign policy.

Define “pseudoscience” simply and in your own words.

Define “pseudoscience” simply and in your own words. For this part, it may help to act like you are explaining it to “your niece or nephew in high school”—not “dumbed down,” just clear, direct, and in your own words. In your explanation, contrast pseudoscience with science. Identify two examples of pseudoscience. Explain why you classify your examples as pseudoscience. Explain the implications of the examples of pseudoscience you have given. Is it really a problem for people to believe in those phenomena (the incidents of pseudoscience that you identified)? Why or why not?

Discuss External and Internal Environments.

Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies Overview In this assignment, you are to use the same corporation you selected and focused on for Assignment 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness and Assignment 2: External and Internal Environments. Research the company on its own website, the public filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR database, the University’s online databases, the Nexis Uni database, and any other sources you can find. The annual report will often provide insights that can help address some of these questions. Requirements Write a six- to eight-page paper in which you do the following: Analyze the business-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the business-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion. Analyze the corporate-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the corporate-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion. Analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporation’s most significant competitor. Compare their strategies at each level and evaluate which company you think is most likely to be successful in the long term. Justify your choice. Determine whether your choice from Question 3 would differ in slow-cycle and fast-cycle markets. Use at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not quality as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. Use the Assignment 3 Template [DOC] to ensure that your assignment meets the above requirements. The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows: Determine business-level and corporate-level strategies for a corporation’s long-term success comparable to the competitive environment. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic and organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the scoring rubric. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.