CONSIDERATIONSAND EVALUATIONThere are three key things to consider when designing and implementing your project: audience, affordances of your chosen medium, and interventionwith course materials.Since many formats for the project may leave some or much of these considerations implicit, itis recommended that students include some written information separatefrom the projectproductthat explains what sorts of decisions were made with respect to audience, affordances, and intervention(e.g. a paragraph ina document accompanying your submission).(1) Audience:who is your target audience?What other audiences mightview or hear your product. In other words, who might be auditors, overhearers, eavesdroppers? How haveyour choice of medium and the content of your project(e.g. how academic/ technical your content is) responded to your identified audiences?(2)Affordances:how does your selected medium for your project shape the possibilities for communication and the probable ways that audiences might engage with your project? How was your choice of medium related to your target audience? Are there any ways that your selected medium has limited what you were able to accomplish with your project?(3) Intervention:how does your project’s intervention connect to course materials and key theories about language and social justice? If you have chosen for these theories to remain implicit in your final product, why did you make this choice? Be as specific as possible about which theories, which aspects of which theories, and where you got this information from.Students will be evaluated primarily in terms of how each project addresses these three considerationsin the final product and/or in an accompanying document. If these considerations are primarily addressed in theaccompanying document, it needs tobe fairly clear to mehow the accompanying document is connected to the final product (in other words, if a student writes a great accompanying document but that document has nothing to do with the final product, the student will not have earned a high mark on the project).The evaluation is holistic and fairly subjective and there is no rubric for this assignment beyond this information. Try not to worry too much about evaluation, please also source this book does not include the other 4 sources (Avineri, Netta, Laura R. Graham, Eric J. Johnson, Robin Conley Riner, and Jonathan Rosa (eds.). (2019). Language and Social Justice in Practice. New York: Routledge.[LSJ]