Reaction Paper Assignment Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to explore the professional and ethical issues of counseling and referring when dealing with counselor-client value differences.    Directions:  To begin this assignment, you will need to access and read the following sources, the first 3 of which can be found in the Module/Week 2 Reading & Study folder:   1. Kocet and Herlihy’s article on values based ethical decisions: Kocet, M. M., & Herlihy, B. J. (2014). Addressing value‐based conflicts within the counseling relationship: A decision‐making model. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(2), 180-186.   2. The American Counseling Association’s (ACA) position on referrals: Martz, E., & Kaplan, D. (2014). New responsibilities when making referrals. Counseling Today, 57(4), 24-25.   3. Sells, J. N., & Hagedorn, W. B. (2016). CACREP accreditation, ethics, and the affirmation of both religious and sexual identities: A response to Smith and Okech. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(3), 265-279.     For this article you need to focus on the material starting on page 273 at “Embracing the Tension of Humanity” to the end.      Divide your paper into the headings below and address each question under each heading:   Summarize (1–2 pages) In this section, summarize what you have read by condensingthe three articles. Prove that you have comprehended the material by writing a clear, brief summary of the main points of each source. A summarization is not a commentary; rather, it is an insightful précis of the longer, more elaborate article. It must provide a clear overview of the material.    Reflect (1–2 pages) In this section reflect on what you just read and answer the following questions: • Having read the articles, what new realizations and/or questions occurred for you? • How do you feel about the ACA position of not referring clients based on value differences?