Write an essay summarizing the history of climate change science, politics, and policy in the American context.

Write an essay summarizing the history of climate change science, politics, and policy in the American context. Questions to consider: How did the scientific understanding of the problem of global warming/climate change evolve in the post-WWII period? Who were the key individuals who brought concern about the long-term threat of global warming to the U.S. government? What events did they set in motion? When and how did opposition coalesce to question scientific certainty about global warming? Who was behind this opposition? How did the debate over climate change reflect the growing polarization in American society over environmentalism? What policies did they bring about, or fail to bring about? Is climate change related to the larger “ecological crisis” identified by many environmentalists in the 1960s and 1970s, or is it a unique and unprecedented environmental problem in American history? Please consult the following assigned materials in writing your essays, as well as your notes from class discussions on 11/19, 11/21, 12/5, 12/10, and 12/12 (you will have PPTs to consult for the 12/10 and 12/12 classes). You are not required to cite every single one of these sources, but your essay should be informed by a majority of them. • Nathaniel Rich, Losing Earth: A Recent History • Roger Revelle, Testimony Before the House Appropriations Committee, May 1957 (PDF in Canvas) • James Hansen, Testimony Before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, June 1988 (PDF in Canvas) • Climate Investigation Center, “Exxon Knew” Documents,

Exxon Knew
• ExxonMobil, Climate Change, https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/energy-and-environment/environmental-protection/climate-change. • Patrick Allitt, “Anti- and Counter-Environmentalists,” in A Climate of Crisis (PDF in Canvas) • S. Fred Singer, “The Costs of Environmental Overregulation” (1993) (PDF in Canvas) • Chris Mooney, “When Did Republicans Start Hating the Environment?” Mother Jones (August 12, 2014),
When Did Republicans Start Hating the Environment?
• Patrick Allitt, “Deep and Radical Ecology,” in A Climate of Crisis: America in the Age of Environmentalism (2014) • Tyler Priest, “Oil on the Edge: The Interrelated Histories of Oil in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Alaskan Arctic” (Draft) (PDF in Canvas)

Write a research paper on can a president be charged with a crime while in office?

You are required to write a paper on an American policy problem/issue that you have picked and submitted to me by the set date. I want to know the source for your material (bibliography) and any quotes taken from specific works or people are to be documented (footnotes). Spelling and grammar count. Papers must be double spaced with 1.25” side margins. Pick a topic that there is ample resources and support material to support it. Papers are due during the exam period as assigned. No exceptions. Tip: get your topics in as early as you can. Run your topics by me and I can help you choose the better topic. Additionally, I want your papers to be issue oriented and not just a report.

Evaluate the appropriateness of a specific psychotherapeutic approach for diverse populations by discussing the strengths and limitations of using this theory with your client’s cultural attributes.

This assignment requires you to apply the theory that you analyzed and evaluated in the previous assignment to the case study that you developed. You will address the following: Describe your client. Provide a summary of your case study. Identify the case goals you will work on with the client and the techniques and interventions you will use. Evaluate the appropriateness of a specific psychotherapeutic approach for diverse populations by discussing the strengths and limitations of using this theory with your client’s cultural attributes. Written communication: Develop accurate written communication and thoughts that convey the overall goals of the project and do not detract from the overall message.

Discuss the normal marital satisfaction pathway over time, and describe a reason for these changes.

1. Describe your own path toward achieving social clock milestones such as financial independence, nest leaving, relationships, and career. If you are or were backsliding, how does that feel? What are (or were) your social clock priorities for getting married and having a career? If you are a nontraditional returning student, did your twenty-something timetable work out? Do you now feel “off time” for your age? To get credit for this question, in your discussion you must specifically refer to concrete studies and examples cited in the text. 2. Outline the four identity statuses described by James Marcia, then describe people you know who seem to fit into two of these categories. Make reference to their emotions and feelings (you can also discuss your own identity status, if you wish). 3. Describe the three different attachment styles and offer real-life examples of people you know who seem to fit each category. 4. Discuss the normal marital satisfaction pathway over time, and describe a reason for these changes. Then discuss what happens when couples become parents. Finally, offer one personal example to illustrate (or not illustrate) these trends derived from a couple you know. (Please don’t use names.) 5. Describe the three poles that Sternberg spells out in his triangular theory of love, and give examples. Then describe two different kinds of relationships that occur when we combine these love poles. 6. Discuss some worries people have when they contemplate divorce. Then suggest a question that best predicts when divorcing may be “the better choice.” 7. Describe what Holland’s category (or categories) might best fit your personality. Then target what you expect from your career in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic career rewards. 8. Your elderly loved one is still driving, but it’s clear that her sensory-motor impairments are making this activity difficult. First spell out the dilemmas you and society face in this situation and then suggest some creative actions to take. 9. Describe the three major criticisms of Kübler-Ross’s stage theory of dying. Which specific emotion would you be most apt to find in a loved one with a “fatal” diagnosis? 10. Argue for and against legalizing active euthanasia. Where do you stand on this question? 11. Spell out a main purpose/function of hospice programs. 12. Target the key difference between a living will and a durable power of attorney for health care. 13. Spell out the difference between “passive” and “active” euthanasia. 14. Describe the core brain changes that produce Alzheimer’s disease. 15. Give a real-life example of generativity in action that you observed recently. 16. Briefly describe two problems inherent to the grandparent role. 17. Briefly list two forces that make caring for caring for an elderly parent more difficult. 18. Briefly list two communication patterns associated with marital happiness. 19. List three major changes in the work world over the past few decades.

Create a comprehensive policy package that builds on China’s growth patterns, and explores new avenues for growth for China.

Look forward to the next 20-25 years.Carefully consider the current growth patterns in China, and the sectors that contribute most to economic growth.Ensure that have reviewed fiscal policy and macroeconomic policies that we are studying in class this week. Create a comprehensive policy package that builds on China’s growth patterns, and explores new avenues for growth for China. Your policy package should be designed to solidify and encourage sustainable economic growth for China over the next 20-25 years.

Write a definition essay in which you provide an extended explanation of your particular understanding of both “hate speech”by Richard Stengel and “free speech”by Conor Friedersdorf.

Read “’Why America Needs a Hate Speech Law” by Richard Stengel and “Bad Arguments for Limiting Speech” by Conor Friedersdorf. Then write a definition essay in which you provide an extended explanation of your particular understanding of both “hate speech” and “free speech,” focusing on this question: are “hate speech” and “free speech” compatible or incompatible—in other words, does/should “free speech” include “hate speech,” or not? Include examples to help you illustrate and explain your definitions.