rticle Critique: Scientific Discoveries in the News
Purpose: To use critical writing and critical thinking skills to research new discoveries and investigations in science. Use the popular media including newspapers, magazines, and the Internet Databases to locate a recent article about new scientific technological discoveries and new applications. You could research topics such as global climatic change, new going green technologies, alternative fuels, hazardous materials, chemical additives, environmental toxins, cloning/stem cell research, genetic research, nanotechnology, etc… It is important to find a topic that catches your interest and a topic that is meaningful to you. The article should be no more than one year old. You will be required to review, summarize, and respond to the article. You will need to write a minimum of 2 full pages. One full page must be a summary of the information presented in the article and one full page must be your reaction to the research and topic. Summarize the science behind the article, and provide a thoughtful critique of the importance of that work to our society. All writing must be in APA format: Times New Roman font 12, 1 inch margins, double spaced. You must provide a reference in APA format and have appropriate in-text citations.
Objective: The objective of this assignment is to demonstrate the student’s ability to research and evaluate current issues, think critically, communicate effectively, and argue persuasively.
Guidelines:
A. Article Summary: Analyze the article (45%):
Read the article completely and identify the author’s main point.
Highlight and define unfamiliar words. Look for the main idea of each major section.
Write down the main ideas as you perceive them. Insert parenthetical reference citations in APA format while drafting your critique.
Identify the author and determine the author’s relationship to the subject. What are the author’s credentials? Can he/she be considered an authority on the subject?
Analyze how the author supports his/her ideas with examples, facts, or opinions). Has the author convinced you of the main ideas of the article? Why and how?
What are the principal contributions of the science behind the article? (That is, why is the science being done — does it seem important to the environment, medicine, the human condition, etc.?)
B. Reaction to the Article (45%):
In your opinion, is the research justified, or frivolous? Does it deserve public funding and attention?
Does the article raise any moral or societal dilemmas? In your judgment, are those dilemmas valid, or are they ‘hype’? Does the article provide evidence that humans should change their behavior? Could these issues affect daily life in America or other nations? Will these issues present a positive and/or negative effect on living things?
Is your reaction to the article based on your own experiences or other reading that you have done? Did this article change your viewpoint on the science being reported? Explain.
Do you feel that the author(s) ignored certain evidence or alternative viewpoints? Did the author’s reasoning persuade you or do you think he/she made mistakes in logic?
Summarize your main points, and develop a strong position that you are prepared to support. Don’t be afraid to take a stand! If you think the research should be continued or discontinued, state your reasons.
C. Format (10%)
