Prepare a literature review, charting the development of the concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution from its inception until the present day..

1. Establish the scenario for your report by selecting an organisation of any type, sector and size to focus your report on. Describe:
a) Which organisation is it? (type, sector and size)
b) What are the main products and/or services provided by the organisation?
c) Who are the main customers?
(10% of word count)

Adequate

2. Prepare a literature review, charting the development of the concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution from its inception until the present day.

Ensure that you include references to at least 10 peer-reviewed articles, including the 2017 paper by Szozda that has been supplied. You may also find relevant reviews in the trade press and from other authoritative sources.
(45% of word count)

The section does not delve into key issues on the 4th industrial revolution- key benefits (operational and/or customer outcomes

3. Replicate Szozda’s case study (as illustrated by Figures 4 and 5 in the supplied paper) in the context of your chosen company.

How will the company change?
(45% of word count)

You have balked at the idea of producing two illustrations as outlined in the assessment brief meaning you are missing key deliverables for this section

General comments: The submission falls below the standards of level 7

Explain what [policy] changes need to be made to make sure that persons like the main character in your story do not engage in crime.

Based on your knowledge of the theories and our discussion in class, this paper will require you to select one of the films from the list below and utilize three theories we have covered this semester to explain the criminal behavior depicted in the film.
*NOTE: When choosing a theory, focus on one theorist and go into detail about their interpretation of the theory, instead of explaining all the variations of the theory. For example, Anomie/Strain theories include Merton, Agnew, and Messner & Rosenfeld—choose only one theory from that group.

You should choose three theories you believe explain the character(s) and provide in-depth details from the film that support your argument highlighting the major assumptions of each theory you choose. Most importantly, make sure your facts are specific enough and relate to the theory’s assumptions. You are to answer the following questions:
How do the theories you have chosen explain the main character’s behavior (e.g. how can each of the three theories be applied to explain the behavior)?
Explain what [policy] changes need to be made to make sure that persons like the main character in your story do not engage in crime.

Watch the full documentary The Weather Underground that I will show in class after Exam 2 and determine the filmmaker’s purpose. Identify four questions and themes that the producer attempts to answer.

Watch the full documentary The Weather Underground that I will show in class after Exam 2 and determine the filmmaker’s purpose. Identify four questions and themes that the producer attempts to answer.

Research the claims made in the documentary. Consult at least five academic sources. Wikipedia and encyclopedias don’t count.

In your review, creatively introduce the documentary in a half page. In other words, what is the filmmaker seeking to demonstrate? Then raise the questions the producer is seeking to answer and tell me the four themes from the film you are going to investigate.

In the body of the paper, describe and analyze the four areas you investigated (one page pure theme). As you summarize tell me if you find the evidence compelling or not. From your research, are the facts reliable and the conclusions sound? If you find “missing information,” would it strengthen or weaken the case put forth in the documentary? You cannot cover everything, so choose wisely the information you think is worth your attention or criticism. Unlike the introduction, do not just give me a statement of opinion, but rather explain your reasoning process.

For your conclusion (a half page to a page and a half), summarize and state the significance of your major points. What is the key to understanding the documentary? What historical impacts can be identified? What lessons can be drawn from your review?

Make sure to properly document your sources. To reiterate, you need to consult and cite within your film review at least five academic sources, not encyclopedic articles. In other words, Wikipedia doesn’t count. All short articles or copies of the pages from books or longer articles that you cited within your essay must be turned in with your paper. Failure to follow this instruction will result in a failing grade.

Discuss Mao II as DeLillo’s response to the global controversy surrounding publication of Salman Rushdie’s 1989 novel, The Satanic Verses.

ources: DeLillo’s Mao II novel is your primary source and should be acknowledged on the “Works Cited” page. Secondary sources are required, must substantiate the paper’s content and be academically credible. Those sources must include electronic library holdings and/or articles from peer-reviewed, scholarly publications. To translate: library databases, such as JSTOR and Academic Search Complete, will be helpful in this regard— and don’t forget to explore electronic books in the library catalogue as well..

How Evaluated: See “Essay Grading Rubric” attatched file

Essay Prompts:

Select ONE of these topics as the basis for the paper

Discuss Mao II as DeLillo’s response to the global controversy surrounding publication of Salman Rushdie’s 1989 novel, The Satanic Verses.
or
Elaborate on Bill Gray’s proclamation that Karen carries “the virus of the future.”
or
Elaborate on the novel as a polemic against the commodification of the novelist.
or
Discuss the prescient nature of DeLillo’s novel, elaborating on how Mao II foreshadows post-9/11 America.

Compare and contrast the event/person to another historical event/person we discussed in class.

For your final essay,(Introduction, 3 body paragraphs, conclusion) you are required to discuss one historical event, organization/group or person that we’ve read about or discussed in class. Provide an analysis of the historical event/person. You will need to support your argument with readings and films viewed in class. If you decide to use other sources, remember to cite.

Consider the following questions based on your topic:

Who is the person? What part of history did they contribute to? What impact did he/she make?

Compare and contrast the event/person to another historical event/person we discussed in class.

Why is this event/person important today?

Your essay should have an Introduction, Thesis, Supporting Details, and Conclusion, and Work Cited.


book: Brian Behnken. Civil Rights and Beyond: African American and Latino/a Activism in the Twentieth-Century United States. chapter 6

Discuss what other ethical issues might be associated with the relationship between Bill and Joe?

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

View this Ethical Dilemma (https://resources.careered.com/LCMSFileSharePreview/Resources/MSWordDocument/Scenario_A.docx ) to learn more about the relationship between Joe, the salesman for UWEAR, and Bill, the customer. Bill and Joe have a history of business dealings which you will analyze using ethical principles. It seems that their dealings are in the grey area of business conduct and it’s important to discuss the dilemma to understand the implications of this behavior.
Once you have read the ethical dilemma, discuss the following questions with your classmates:

Are Bill’s gifts a form of bribery?
Which ethical theory supports your view? Why?
What other ethical issues might be associated with the relationship between Bill and Joe?

Create a researched essay focused on one or more of the course’s assigned readings.

Purpose: This assignment relates directly to all primary course objectives:
1. awareness of major writers and literary periods in the canon of British Literature,
2. competence in literary analysis,
3. an understanding of fundamental literary and critical terminology, and
4. an awareness of aesthetic experiences as a dimension of life by demonstrating competence in literary studies.
Specific Assignment Objectives:
 Create a debatable focused thesis, an argument based on one or more of the assigned readings in the course.
 Develop the focused thesis in an organized essay that flows in a logical presentation.
 Support the focused thesis with both the primary source(s) and secondary scholarly sources.
 Use scholarly research to support the focused thesis.
 Incorporate and cite scholarly sources using MLA format.
 Create a researched essay focused on one or more of the course’s assigned readings.

Requirements for the Polished Research Essay
 Your essay will propose a central idea (thesis) that is supported and developed with body paragraphs that grow systematically out of the central idea. Everything in the essay must be directly related to the central idea and must contribute to the reader’s understanding of that central idea.
You started with a question, which you may have refined over time. The essay should provide a thoughtful answer to that question, using ideas and information from your sources. An essay makes an argument (tries to prove a point), so the essay should reflect at least solid critical thinking skills. (See the descriptions of A-level, B-level, etc. work in the course syllabus.)
Spring 2020 REVISED 2
 Both the primary source, the literary text you are using from this course, and the secondary sources are required to support the thesis.
 From three to five secondary, scholarly sources are required. Do not use unreliable online sources, such as Wikipedia or SparkNotes. Only scholarly sources are accepted. Ask a librarian for help.