Choose any two of the philosophers that we read in Unit 2. Recap each philosopher’s main view about consciousness/the self/personal identity. Explain at least one difference between the two philosophers’ views and state which view you prefer. Then, offer an argument (i.e., evidence) against the view that you reject.
dentifies the various ethical aspects of the topic
-Analyzes, at least, two practical examples
-Relates the topic to the theories and principles studied in the class
-Discusses the potential challenges resulting from real-life ethical dilemmas and points toward solutions that are suggested in scholarly resources.
-Compares to Christian worldview and principles
2) Positive and negative critique
-Shows critical thinking in assessing the strong and weak points of relevant ethical theories applicable to the chosen topic
-Suggests new possible avenues for understanding and solving the practical challenges of the chosen topic
3) Biblical evaluation
-Compares to biblical principles in a clear and objective manner
-Critically asses the topic in the light of biblical revelation
(6 points)
4) Application
-Makes clear and relevant practical application of analysis and principles discussed in the paper to modern day life situations. (2 points)
5) LANGUAGE AND STYLE
-The paper contains no serious errors in grammar, spelling or mechanics.
-Single format (Turabian-Vyhmester System (Nancy W. Vyhmeister, Quality Research Papers, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2007)) is used for in-text and bibliographic references to external resources.
-Font: size 12, Times New Roman, Arial or Calibri
-Line spacing: double
-Front page must contain the title of the paper, the student’s full name and ID#, and date of submission.
Write a brief argumentative paper following the material presented in the course. Use the specific structure as discussed on p. 220 of the Terryberry (2017) textbook.
Choose a topic that has some differing opinions on it; perhaps a controversial one. The topic need not be one from your professional discipline as it is the writing that is important not really the topic.
n Writing Assignment #1, you will identify various communication inhibitors in the context of your workplace or community, define the inhibitors in your own words, prepare a table with descriptions of the inhibitors, and write a brief summary rating the effectiveness of communication in the chosen context. The analysis you prepare for this report might pave the way for your final paper, the Research-Based Report.
For this Assignment, select and view one movie from the list provided in this week’s resources below. Begin to conceptualize the couple’s or family’s problem through your theoretical orientation, and identify interventions that you might use. Finally, begin to locate articles in the Walden Library that could be used to justify the interventions you selected.
Gilbert, B. (Producer), & Rydell, M. (Director). (1981). On golden pond [Motion picture]. United States: IPC Films.
Demme, J., Armian, N., & Platt, M. (Producers), & Demme, J. (Director). (2008). Rachel getting married [Motion picture]. United States: Sony Pictures Classics.
Schwary, R. (Producer), & Redford, R. (Director). (1980). Ordinary people [Motion picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures.
Fischoff, R., & Jaffe, S. (Producers), & Benton, R. (Director). (1979). Kramer vs. Kramer [Motion picture]. . United States: Columbia Pictures.
Pratt, C. (Producer), & Carlino, L. J. (Director). (1979). The great Santini [Motion picture]. United States: Warner Bros. & Orion Pictures.
The Assignment (2–3 pages)
• Identify the movie you selected and the life transition and developmental issue present in the couple or family.
• Conceptualize the couple’s or family’s problem through your chosen theoretical orientation.
• Design a treatment plan including short- and long-term goals.
• Explain two evidence-based interventions you would use to address these couple’s or family’s issues and how you would use them.
1. Assess framework requirements for information systems integration processes
2. Explain the importance of establishing strategies for information sourcing strategies across various industries
3. Contrast system integration processes related to merger and acquisitions with integrating new technology with existing information systems
Read
1.Antecedents of information systems sourcing strategies in U.S. hospitals: A longitudinal study (http://ezproxy.sckans.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=125996708&site=eds-live&scope=site)
2. Beyond integration readiness level (IRL): A multidimensional framework to facilitate the integration of system of systems. (http://ezproxy.sckans.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=126959401&site=eds-live&scope=site)
3. Understanding information systems integration deficiencies in mergers and acquisitions: A configurational perspective. (http://ezproxy.sckans.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=121235105&site=eds-live&scope=site)
Describe an argument that you found convincing. Who or what was making the argument (a person, an article, or an advertisement, etc.)? What viewpoints were argued? Why was it convincing?
Choose any two of the philosophers that we read in Unit 2. Recap each philosopher’s main view about consciousness/the self/personal identity. Explain at least one difference between the two philosophers’ views and state which view you prefer.
What should be done to lower the national debt?
Objectives
1. Assess framework requirements for information systems integration processes
2. Explain the importance of establishing strategies for information sourcing strategies across various industries
3. Contrast system integration processes related to merger and acquisitions with integrating new technology with existing information systems
Read
1.Antecedents of information systems sourcing strategies in U.S. hospitals: A longitudinal study (http://ezproxy.sckans.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=125996708&site=eds-live&scope=site)
2. Beyond integration readiness level (IRL): A multidimensional framework to facilitate the integration of system of systems. (http://ezproxy.sckans.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=126959401&site=eds-live&scope=site)
3. Understanding information systems integration deficiencies in mergers and acquisitions: A configurational perspective. (http://ezproxy.sckans.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=121235105&site=eds-live&scope=site)
