Write a film review of ‘Who the Bleep is Jackson Pollock?’ Directed by Harry Moses.

Must follow attached rubric Organizational structure defines the hierarchy within an organization by identifying each job and where it reports to within the organization.
Explain the organizational structure where you work or an organization you are familiar, include an organizational chart, you may remove specific names.
Discuss if the organizational structure supported by theory or not
Describe the formal leadership
Describe the informal leadership
Discuss the importance of informal leadership, is the informal leadership a positive or negative influence?
Identify at least two best practices from the literature that could benefit your organization
Support your discussion and opinions with facts, relevant examples from personal nursing practice.
After reading the… Are we there yet.. article answer the following questions; you may use quotes from the article to enhance your response; make sure to add quotation marks and the page number.
After you Post please read and comment/respond to 2 classmates impressions as well.
Remember writing counts as does quality in your comments…
1. What were your impressions of the ECE-early childhood education or CYC-child and youth care field before you read this? How have they changed?
2. How are child and youth workers portrayed in our culture and society?
3. What are the comparable work situations (jobs that are underappreciated by the public) that you know of when working with young children?
In one or two (double-spaced) paragraphs, explain what it means to say that a moral claim is objective (as explained in class.)(a) You should pretend that the person you’re writing for doesn’t know anything about objectivity in the relevant sense. As such, you should write as clearly as possible. If a friend or family member doesn’t understand what you write, that’s a sign that you need to write more clearly.(b) Explain things in your own words (don’t use quotations) and come up with your own examples.(c) You should not say anything about whether moral claims are objective—we don’t want you to give reasons for or against the view. You could do that in a bigger assignment, but not this one.(d) It’s crucial, so I’ll say it again: Write clearly. The only way I know how to write clearly is to write and then rewrite and then rewrite and then rewrite again. Writing is rewriting. Writing is rewriting. Let this be your mantra for this course.(e) Don’t try to impress us with fancy jargon or complicated sentences. We’ll be annoyed. We like things that are easy to read. Write concisely.(f) When explaining a technical concept there are four main things you can do.(a) give a definition(b) give a rough characterization(c) explain what you are talking about, by distinguishing it from what you are *not* talking about.(d) Examples. Examples. Examples.
1. What is the specific problem with communication?
2. Does the problem represent an example of one of the barriers that the articles from MSG, Pandita, and Jain identify? If so, which one(s)?
3. What are some possible communication strategies in notifying someone about the problem?
4. What is the best course of action to take in solving the problem?
5. What is the best way to communicate this problem to the relevant individuals?