Create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed references published within the last ten years to inform the diagnosis and treatment recommendations.

For this assignment, students will investigate and propose a psychiatric diagnosis based on the case study from the Gorenstein and Comer (2015) textbook Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology, chosen in the Week One “Initial Call” discussion. This paper will include an in-depth overview of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, treatment options for the diagnosis, and a sound rationale that explains why this diagnosis was made. Note that the diagnosis may include more than one psychiatric disorder.

The paper must present a thorough overview of each disorder within the diagnosis. Assume the audience has no prior knowledge of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, and provide relevant and easy to understand explanations of each for the readers. When writing the paper, it is critical to convey all the necessary information in a straightforward manner using non-technical language. (Reference the Professional Voice and Writing (Links to an external site.) resource provided by the Ashford Writing Center for assistance.) Support the analysis with at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last ten years in addition to the course text.

The Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper must include the following:

  • Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation using professional terminology. Identify symptoms and behaviors exhibited by the patient in the chosen case study.
  • Match the identified symptoms to potential disorders in a diagnostic manual.
  • Propose a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms and the criteria listed for the disorder(s) in the diagnostic manual.
  • Analyze and explain how the patient meets criteria for the disorder(s) according to the patient’s symptoms and the criteria outlined in the diagnostic manual.
  • Justify the use of the chosen diagnostic manual (i.e., Why was this manual chosen over others?).
  • Summarize general views of the diagnosis from multiple theoretical orientations and historical perspectives. Include a discussion on comorbidity if the diagnosis includes more than one disorder.
  • Evaluate symptoms within the context of an appropriate theoretical orientation for this diagnosis.
  • Use at least two peer-reviewed articles to assess the validity of this diagnosis, and describe who is most likely to have the diagnosis with regard to age, gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. Provide a brief evaluation of the scientific merit of these peer-reviewed sources in the validity assessment.
  • Summarize the risk factors (i.e., biological, psychological, and/or social) for the diagnosis. If one of the categories is not relevant, address this within the summary.
  • Compare evidence-based and non-evidence-based treatment options for the diagnosis.
  • Evaluate well-established treatments for the diagnosis, and describe the likelihood of success or possible outcomes for each treatment.
  • Create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed references published within the last ten years to inform the diagnosis and treatment recommendations. In the annotated bibliography, write a two- to three-sentence evaluation of the scientific merit of each of these references. For additional assistance with this portion of the assignment, access the Ashford Writing Center’s Sample Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external site.).

Write a paper discussing whether employers should concern themselves with the personal finances of applicants and current employees?

Should employers concern themselves with the personal finances of applicants and current employees? Should personal finances only be a concern with jobs having significant financial responsibility? If someone has a “bad” credit score, what does that tell employers about that person?

Discuss your current organization or one with which you are familiar, whether local, regional, national, or international in scope, in terms of these negative and positive organizational traits as they relate to innovation and entrepreneurial behavior.

The following are common organizational barriers to innovation and entrepreneurial behavior:

  • Lack of management commitment
  • Vague or missing measures of performance
  • No incentives for success
  • Penalties for failure
  • Resistance to change (desire to keep a narrow market focus or cling to present products)

Conversely, the following are characteristics of organizations that encourage innovation and entrepreneurial behavior:

  • Supportive
  • Protective
  • Tolerant
  • Trusting
  • Sharing
  • Experimental

Discuss your current organization or one with which you are familiar, whether local, regional, national, or international in scope, in terms of these negative and positive organizational traits as they relate to innovation and entrepreneurial behavior.

Based on Kohlberg Moral Reasoning, what will happened if you take action into your hand and kill the person who molested your child and prevent him to hurt other children, which the legal system failed to do so.

A. Based on Kohlberg Moral Reasoning, what will happened if you take action into your hand and kill the person who molested your child and prevent him to hurt other children, which the legal system failed to do so.

B.By killing your child molester, should you been charged? What type of jail prison you should received?

Write an Essay of compare and analysis between the two culture of Paris and New york city.

Write an Essay of compare and analysis between the two culture of paris and nyc the difference and similarities with the summaries.How is culture engaged in this essay? Culture = Methods for dealing with the harshness of existence. The Birth of Tragedy (1872) by Friedrich Nietzsche What cultural activity is described in the essay? How is culture engaged in this essay?  Culture plays a major role in urban life, both in the U.S. and around the world. The paper will compare how culture happens in two major world cities: New York and Paris. This is a multi-method project that will employ primary historical data and visual ethnography. Essays about first-person experiences of culture in Paris and pictures of culture in New York will be used to understand how culture happens in these two cities. Culture is often a personal experience, so this type of experience will be the starting point. Next, historical data concerning culture in Paris will be summarized and analyzed. Afterwards, visual data concerning culture in New York will be summarized. Finally, culture in New York and Paris will be compared. [Insert your thesis].

Describe the penalties for the filing of a frivolous lawsuit in your home State.

Act a legal adviser writing a memo (total of no more than 700-1000 words) advising the Police Chief or Sheriff as to below issues. As to geographic location information you should use, use your CURRENT physical location (ie. where you live in the USA ( Honolulu Hawaii) to answer the below questions and assume the law enforcement agency is located in your same physical location). Your memo should be marked “Confidential/Attorney Client Privilege”. Your memo should be single spaced and have separate sections for each of the below issues (it can be in bullet format if you wish): If the police agency gets sued, what is the individual State Court System Website and copy/paste its hyperlink. [each state court system has an official website–you must use that site] How many courts of appeals does your State court system have? Which State court of appeals is your home located in? Go to www.uscourts.gov (US Federal Court System Official website) If the police agency gets sued in federal court, which Federal Trial Court (lowest level federal court) covers your home town or current residence location should the agency be sued in that jurisdiction. If the police agency gets sued in federal court, identify which Federal District Court of Appeals your particular state falls under its jurisdiction. If the police agency gets sued, it is important to understand your particular State’s frivolous lawsuit statute or rule. Find it, cite it and explain what it says and also copy/paste its link. Describe the penalties for the filing of a frivolous lawsuit in your home State. If the police agency gets sued it is always important to understand the statute of limitations in your State. Find the statute of limitations in your state and cite it and provide the hyperlink to it. Then, give the statute of limitations for three (3) different types of a State civil lawsuit claims (like battery, assault, theft, breach of contract, negligence, conversion, medical malpractice etc…) that a police agency may be exposed to and NOT criminal acts (DUI, Murder, Rape etc…) If the police agency gets sued in federal court, the case may be dismissed based on the federal court not having “subject matter jurisdiction”. What does that mean? In your explanation include a discussion as to what types of cases that can be heard in federal court (ie. federal courts have limited jurisdiction and can hear only hear cases that trigger their limited jurisdiction). If the police agency gets sued, the plaintiff must carry the burden of proof to what legal standard to prove their claim?