Compare and contrast Dé Leon’s book- land of open graves And Abu Lughod’s book- Veiled sentiments in terms of the relationship they establish with their informants? What are the authors’ socio-economic, ethnic and gendered backgrounds? What do the authors say about the way their own identities define the relation they establish with their informants? How do their specific relations influence the data they present us? (Please include examples from the book)
Identify how your selected sources are relevant to the major components of your paper. You will be required to account for the instructor’s feedback in your final version of the project. For more information on w
Write a literature review on data Loss Prevention.
Provide a clear and succinct explanation using evidenced based literature to support your discussion, and we recommend that your essay covers all of the specialty tracks you selected on your application. Describe the reason for selecting the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing for graduate studies in nursing. Explain your plans for pursuing the MSN degree. Briefly summarize your background professional experience relevant to your specialty selection and rationale for the specialty selected and future career goals, and how does the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing influence your decision.
For the paper, you are required to write a paper similar to a scientific article. Explain the importance of the subject, the aim of this paper and an outline of the study – give an agenda for the rest of the study. Literature review: Describe the history of the topic, explain necessary terms and theories.What can we learn from the history? How do you see the future of the topic?Give full reference to any source that you used in your assignment. Citations in the body of the paper should refer to a bibliography at the end of the paper. Use English sources, so all the readers can read the source as well. Otherwise translate the title of the source in the reference list. Use APA system or Harvard.
In “‘Testimony Against the Whole,’” Bregazzi discusses some ways that political co-existence could be achieved. How are individuals able to break with their legal or social context in order to relate to people who are different from them? Explain how “solitude,” according to Bregazzi and Irigaray, is necessary to being able to live with others, especially others who are different? How, according to Irigaray, is it possible to develop solitude and singularity? What are vertical and horizontal knowledges? How can gratitude help to break from the past and create a new future together? How can solitude help to perceive who the other actually is, as opposed to a misleading representation of them? How could this help to achieve peace?
Write a research paper on the role of the Divine covenants in the old Testament.
Write a term paper on the Cost-benefit of Well Employees”
PHIL 101: Introduction to Philosophy Term Paper Topics: The point of these papers will be to focus on one particular argument or theory. The goal is not to do research (looking up stuff in the library) but to focus your thoughts on one argument or one position and dig deep. Your grade on these essays will be primarily based on the clarity of your writing (that means grammar is important), the command of the material and the “depth” of your explanations. Which side of the issue you are on is completely irrelevant, what matters is how well you state your case. Please consult the course calendar and syllabus for the due date. Please upload your essays into Blackboard through the appropriate dropbox. Please choose one of the following topics: 1. Is the human being purely material, or is there an immaterial component? If the human being is purely material, what does that imply about free will? If there is an immaterial component, what does that imply about free will? In other words: address the question “are human beings just complicated machines, or is there something more to us”? and explain what is implied on both sides of the argument. Don’t just give the argument you happen to agree with; consider objections to it and respond to those objections. Note: students often write essays relying on emotion or sentiment in response to the topic above (“How bleak the world would be if we didn’t have souls” and the like). That is not what you are supposed to be doing: rather, you should write an essay that argues for a specific position and responds to counterarguments. 2. Is there a basis in nature for morality? Is there such a thing as a natural right, natural law, or natural justice? Can human beings know something about right and wrong through the use of unaided reason (i.e., without the help of revealed religion)? Is morality relative to culture, or does morality transcend culture? Explain. 3. Explain, what Socrates might have meant when he said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Do you agree with this position? Why or why not? 4. When we say that pursuing knowledge or wisdom for its own sake has intrinsic value, what does that statement mean? If you disagree, please explain the grounds for your disagreement.
Write a literacy analysis on “Their Eyes were watching God” by Zora Neale Hurston.
