What three things would you consider to be the primary driver of successful work-life balance culture in an organization?

Work Life Balance Locate a peer-reviewed journal article on the topic of work-life balance. The article should be no more than 5 years old. Create proper citation for the article, and answer the following questions. 1) What are the main themes of the article? 2) How is work-life balance defined? 3) What three things would you consider to be the primary driver of successful work-life balance culture in an organization?

Write a paper on ‘How to Lie with Statistics’ using real life examples, including your take or opinion.

Book report on “How To Lie With Statistics” and the form for you to fill out for your journal article examination. Firstly, read ‘How To Lie With Statistics’, here is a free on-line version – https://www.horace.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/How-to-Lie-With-Statistics-1954-Huff.pdf Write a paper on ‘How to Lie with Statistics’ using real life examples, including your take or opinion.

Write a detailed plot summary which emphasizes points of continuity with the Greek or Roman play and your sequel, list and briefly describe your cast of characters, and write a representative scene or two (with dialogue).

The introduction is on the file of Final Project Possibility, please chose one of three to write. Only pick one you think is better to write. Use the study guide to help you. 1) Aristophanic Comic Scenario In the two Aristophanic plays we have read, Lysistrata and Acharnians, we see exemplified what has been called “comedy of the Great Idea,” in which a comic hero or heroine tries to solve a serious, real-life social and/or political problem by means of a creative though hilariously unrealistic plan. For this assignment, channel some of the artistic spirit of Aristophanes by identifying a social and/or political problem of relevance to us today. Then try to solve it by concocting an outrageous and unrealistic solution along the lines of what we find in Aristophanic comedy. Write a detailed plot summary of a play, movie, sitcom episode, book (or any other visual or written medium of your choice), and populate your comedy with a cast of characters, including a comic hero or heroine. 2) Prequels and Sequels In modern cinema, sequels are all the rage. As far as we know, they were unheard of in Greek and Roman comic theater: each play had its own independent storyline which did not spill over into a second play. But for this assignment, imagine that ancient comic writers did have a concept of sequels. Choose one of the plays we have read (preferably one by Menander, Plautus, or Terence), and devise a sequel to it. Write a detailed plot summary which emphasizes points of continuity with the Greek or Roman play and your sequel, list and briefly describe your cast of characters, and write a representative scene or two (with dialogue). 3) Ancient Comedy in Modern Comedy During this semester we are reading a sampling of plays by Aristophanes, Menander, Plautus, and Terence. Each of the four playwrights represents a unique form of comic theater (Greek Old Comedy, Greek New Comedy, Roman Comedy), and each form had its own set of unique dramatic conventions, types of plot, characterization, and so on. For instance, Greek Old Comedy preferred fantastical plots and political satire, whereas Greek New Comedy and Roman Comedy focused instead on the comic dynamic in interpersonal relationships on the homefront. As we fastforward from ancient Greece and Rome to present-day America, we find that comedy assumes a vast number of forms—from late-night political satire (Daily Show, SNL, etc.) to family sitcoms (Modern Family, Simpsons, etc.). For your final project, choose at least one form of comedy—a film, episode (or multiple episodes) of a sitcom, or some other digital or visual medium for comedy—and analyze it closely to find the ways in which its conventions, plot(s), characterization, etc. parallel and trace their roots ultimately (even if indirectly) back to the comic theater of Greece and Rome. Be very specific, citing all relevant character names, comic conventions, scenes or episodes, and so on.

Compare and Contrast Augustine’s and Aquinas’ views concerning laws and virtues and discuss how these views relate to their understanding of the good life for human persons.

1. Compare and Contrast Augustine’s and Aquinas’ views concerning laws and virtues and discuss how these views relate to their understanding of the good life for human persons. 2. Compare and contrast Augustine’s and Aquinas’ views concerning the possibility for human society to express and exemplify goodness. Which of the two thinkers has a more positive view of the possibility of goodness in human society and why?

Consider how individuals are affected – physically and psychologically – by their biological gender?

Based on the novel the handmaids tale, explore the representation of men and women. Consider how individuals are affected – physically and psychologically – by their biological gender? Do the texts challenge or reinforce stereotypes about men and women? Are relationships between men and women sources of conflict, or do they provide respite from the challenges of life? How does presentation of gender relate to the work’s overall theme?

Write a literature review on does sexual abuse impact childs socialization post foster care?

Use the articles you have identified for the topic statement assignment as well as additional ones as needed, to write a review of the literature. If this is your first time writing a literature review, you are encouraged to seek assistance from the Writing Center, which is a free service to all SDSU students: https://writingcenter.sdsu.edu/ I strongly encourage you to begin writing the literature review early so that you may seek assistance as needed. Since this is a research class, we will not cover the basics of writing a literature review, therefore, you’ll need to seek assistance, if needed, through the Writing Center. Additionally, every research article you review will consist of a literature review, pay close attention to how the authors synthesized the literature. The content of the literature review should be focused on the description of the topic, its causes, and consequences. In writing your paper, follow the outline below: 1.Identify your topic and provide a brief introduction of the topic area. 2. Problem Overview – Provide an overview of the problem area. How prevalent is the problem? How is the problem defined in the research that you read? What are some of the consequences or impact of the problem? 3. Causes – What are some theories about the causes of this problem, including contributing factors? Are there different or competing theories related to the topic? 4. Based on your literature review, end with a research question you would like to answer. 5. Make sure to identify the type of research question you have included (e.g., descriptive, exploratory, etc.). Also, identify the independent and dependent variables that are part of your research question(s). Section 2 – Methodology This section follows the literature review where you ended with a research question to answer. In this section, you’ll propose the steps you’ll take in developing a research study to answer your research question. The methodology (i.e., methods) section of a research proposal allows the reader to understand how the data will be collected. It should be detailed enough for a researcher to be able to replicate the study from reading the methods section. Since you will not collect actual data, you 1 M.Villagrana, PhD SW 391 – Fall 2019 will propose the steps you would have taken had you collected data to answer your research question. Since every methodology will vary in terms of the steps taken, the page number for this section should be minimum 4 pages. This section should include the following: 1. What research design will you use? (e.g., cross sectional, pre/posttests, experimental, etc.) 2. Operationalize and conceptualize your variables (i.e., IVs and DV). 3. What measurement tool(s) for the data collection will you use? Part of the data collection is identifying the measurement tool (e.g., survey, questionnaire, etc.) you will use to collect data. In identifying an appropriate measurement tool, include research literature (minimum of 2 research articles) that supports the use of the measurement tool you have identified for your study. 4. Participants: Who will you recruit into your study? a. Provide details such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, etc. b. Include any criteria that needs to be met by the participants and how you will determine whether the criteria are met. For example, homeless military veterans with PTSD. c. Number of participants. 5. Procedures: Include the type of sample used (e.g., convenience sample, random sample, etc.) NOTE: It’s important to show the order in which things will occur. a. How will the sample be identified? b. How will the sample be contacted and/or recruited? c. What method will be used to recruit them? For example, flyers in local grocery stores. d. Who will collect the data? e. Where will activities take place? For example, data will be collected at a school, agency, church, etc. Or at the participant’s home. f. What process or activities will participants engage in? For example, will participants be surveyed, interviewed, etc. Will participants take a test or view a film, etc.? g. Will data collection take place more than once? h. How long will whatever activity (e.g., survey, interview, etc.) take? i. Other important details to include – if using interviews, will the interviews be recorded? Will data collection take place at a certain time of day? Will participants receive an incentive (e.g., money, gift card, etc.)? 6. End with how you will store the data (e.g., questionnaire answers will be inputted into an excel sheet and questionnaires stored in a locked file cabinet or destroyed, etc.). FYI: It’s important to pay attention to the research articles you have reviewed for the literature review, and in identifying a measurement tool, as these research articles will have examples of how the authors/researchers developed their study. Pay attention to the 2 M.Villagrana, PhD SW 391 – Fall 2019 methodology, or methods, section of these articles in writing your own methods as these will serve as sample methodology sections. Section 3 – Limitations This is a brief discussion (i.e., 1-2 paragraphs) where you discuss the potential limitations of your proposal, had the study been conducted. These are factors that are out of the control of the researcher and/or restrictions imposed by the researcher that may potentially influence the results of your study. For example, if you propose to survey only social work students at SDSU, this will limit the generalizability to only SDSU social work students, where you can’t generalize your findings to all social work students. The following link explains what limitations should be include: https://www.edanzediting.com/blogs/how-write-about-your-study-limitations-without- limiting-your-impact Section 4 – Contributions and Implications All research studies need to have been designed to answer a research question or questions that will have an impact and/or contribute to the field of social work. Therefore, you should wrte a paper that describe the potential contributions and implications of your research proposal to the field of social work. The research articles you have used up to this point should all include a last section where the authors/researchers discuss their study’s implications/contributions.

What are the implications of the Indian Act both historically and in contemporary times?

Tobias (1989) outlines there are three eras of Canada’s Indian policy, which are protection, civilization, and assimilation. Using 21 Things You May not know about the Indian Act (Joseph, 2018) and other course readings and course material, what are the implications of the Indian Act both historically and in contemporary times?