Write a at least 3 to 5 or more sentences) for each question. 1. What do you feel is the best approach/tools to use for making management decisions? Please think about what tools/approaches and write a paragraph about why you feel it the best approach and if you would use it. 2. What do you feel is the worst approach/tools to use for making management decisions? Please think about what tools/approaches and write a paragraph about why you feel it is the worst approach and why.
Answer each question that belongs to the scenario below : One page per scenario . 1. A local police department suspects that three individuals, Alvin, Simon, and Theodore, are growing marijuana on their property and selling it around town. The officers, though, do not have probable cause to obtain a warrant. As a result, the officers begin discussing some creative avenues for acquiring information about these individuals and their activities. A rookie officer who majored in Political Science in college offers three options: 1) looking through trash left outside of the suspects’ home; 2) flying over the suspects’ backyard and using standard binoculars to search for marijuana plants; and 3) using a newly developed piece of equipment that can scan the suspects’ house and detect the presence of large quantities of organic plants. 1. The Supreme Court’s decision in Kyllo v. United States has implications for which option? Why? 3. The Supreme Court decision California v. Greenwood has direct implications for Option 1, Why? 4. Which of these options is most likely to be deemed unconstitutional? Why? 2. Three college students are travelling from upstate New York to Florida for spring break. In Buford, Georgia, they come to a stop at DUI checkpoint. An officer approaches the driver’s side window, determines that the driver is sober, and tells the college students to head on their way. However, a second officer, suspicious of the out-of-state license plate, attaches a GPS locator to the car’s rear bumper just before the students drive off. Police conduct surveillance on the car’s movements for the next week, and after determining that the car went to Florida—movements that the officers deem consistent with drug trafficking—the Buford police determine that they will stop this vehicle the next time it enters their jurisdiction. Sure enough, as the car enters Buford on the college student’s trip home after a week in Florida, it is pulled over by an officer. As the driver hands the officer a driver’s license, the officer says that he smells marijuana in the car and initiates a search of the vehicle. Inside a zipped backpack on the backseat, he finds contraband and makes an arrest. 5. Discuss the constitutionality of a DUI checkpoint and an officer’s act of visually inspecting the inside of the car. 6. Discuss the constitutionality of the act of placing a GPS locator on the rear bumper of the car and conducting surveillance on its movements. 7. Assume that the traffic stop on the student’s return trip had in fact been a valid one. Further assume that an officer legitimately smells marijuana. Discuss the constitutionality of the seizure of the contraband. Three college students who attend a public university share an apartment in Collegetown, USA. Police have heard that three members of the local college’s varsity swim team live there and have all recently failed university-administered drug tests. Police show up at the apartment hoping they can acquire to consent to enter. As they approach the apartment, police see that the landlord is standing outside the door. Police ask the landlord to let them in. The landlord, who is a lawyer, refuses, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Chapman v. United States. Irritated, police instead knock on the door. A student who is exiting the apartment allows the police to enter. While the police are standing in the common area, a resident of the home exits his apartment and tells police to leave, but immediately before his door completely close the police observe marijuana plants and drug paraphernalia inside the resident’s home. The police then rush into the resident’s apartment and seize this evidence. They then place resident under arrest. 8. Was the landlord’s refusal to grant police access to the apartment appropriate? Why? 9. Discuss the validity of the consent of the student who allowed the police to enter the common areas in the home. 10. Discuss whether the seizure of the contraband from the point of view of the police was valid? How? 11. Discuss the argument that you think arrested resident’s lawyer will make as to why evidence seized should be suppressed.
Research question: How has the stereotypes and social structures of the past contributed to the unjust incarceration of African Americans in society today? You must approach it from a sociological viewpoint. This means taking into account how the issue is embedded within a social structural, cultural and institutional context. In general, a good rule is to ask yourself: “How does what I’m studying intersect with other social structures/institutions, and how might those structures/institutions be reformed or adapted to better deal with the issue and/or improve the outcomes for those affected by it?”
Write an essay on the Importance of Early Childhood Development (infant-preschool).
Write a paper that addresses the ways leaders can meet the future ethical challenges of technology and diversity in organizations. Include the following in your paper: 1. A discussion of the potential ethical issues leaders may encounter in managing technology and diversity in an organization. 2. A research supported discussion of strategies a leader can use to mitigate potential ethical issues created by technology and diversity. (Benchmarks C5.1: Develop a leadership style that can respond to the challenges and opportunities inherent in a global environment.)
You are encouraged to be creative when choosing a new business idea. Just bear in mind that it must be one that can be researched so you are encouraged to do some preliminary research in the EBSCO Business Source Premier or ProQuest Central databases at the eLibrary or on the internet. t: Your proposal should include the following five sections in the order presented below, and run between 7-10 pages, double-spaced, not counting your works cited and any appendices you might include, in APA (American Psychological Association) style. Your assignment should be submitted as a Word documentWord logo.png, or an equivalent format. Index Five Sections of Completed Research Proposal I. Problem or objective: Research proposals generally begin with an introductory section that describes the research problem and establishes its significance. This section answers the following kinds of questions: What exactly do you want to study? Why is it worth studying? Does the proposed study have theoretical and/or practical significance? Does it contribute to a new understanding of a phenomenon (e.g., does it address new or little-known material or does it treat familiar material in a new way or does it challenge an existing understanding or extend existing knowledge)? II. Research question: Your specific research question or hypotheses should be stated clearly at the end of the description of the problem/objective. III. Literature Review of articles published on your proposed research topic (at least two articles from scholarly journals must be included in your review): The literature review presents a discussion of the most important research and theoretical work relating to the research problem/objective. It addresses the following kinds of questions: What have others said about this area(s)? What theories address it and what do these say? What research has been done (or not done) previously? Are there consistent findings or do past studies disagree? Are there flaws or gaps in the previous research that your study will seek to remedy? IV. Procedures – Methods Section: This section describes how you will conduct your study. Regardless of the type of research you plan to do, you need to indicate how you will carry out your study so others may judge its viability. This section should cover the following four points: Subjects for study. Describe the subjects (people or objects, e.g. texts) for your study, considering carefully the type and number you need. Explain your method of selecting your subject(s) (and if a sample, describe the population and how the sample will be drawn). Discuss the subject(s) in relation to your research question or hypothesis, to availability, and to your research design. That is, you need to identify the subjects and make clear whether they will be available and how you will reach them. This section typically answers the following questions: Who or what will you study in order to collect data? Is it appropriate to select a sample from a larger pool? If so, how will you do that? How do these subjects relate to your research question(s)? Measurement. Describe the kinds of measures you intend to use and explain why you have selected these (have they been used previously? if not, have you piloted them?). A discussion of measurements generally considers the following questions: What are the key variables in your study? How will you define and measure them? Do your definitions and measurements draw on or differ from those of previous research in this area? Data-Collection Methods. Describe what you plan to actually do and the kind of research you will conduct. Your data-collection methods obviously need to be consistent with your research problem, your subjects and your measurements. This section typically considers the following question: How will you actually collect the data for your study? Analysis. Describe the kind of analysis you plan to conduct, and explain the logic and purpose of your analysis. The kind(s) of analysis you plan will, of course, be contingent on the subjects, the measures and the data collection as well as on your research question so you will need to explain how you will analyze the data you collect.
Write an essay research/informative paper on “the citizen and regime”
Create a critical Thinking / Review on Communication in Educational Setting difference between Men and Women.
