Select one of the key social problems discussed in the book (poverty, racism, bullying, etc.), and summarize the author’s findings and analysis of that issue.Racism in The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander

Select one of the key social problems discussed in the book (poverty, racism, bullying, etc.), and summarize the author’s findings and analysis of that issue. Finally, evaluate the contributions of the author’s research to the broader sociological understanding of the issue and make recommendations for future research

Select one of the key social problems discussed in the book (poverty, racism, bullying, etc.), and summarize the author’s findings and analysis of that issue.

Select one of the key social problems discussed in the book (poverty, racism, bullying, etc.), and summarize the author’s findings and analysis of that issue. Finally, evaluate the contributions of the author’s research to the broader sociological understanding of the issue and make recommendations for future research

Write a Research Paper Using Literary Criticism and a Biographical Source

Research Paper Using Literary Criticism and a Biographical Source
Essay #2
Choose one work of literature from the list below. Brainstorm a list of what most interests you about this work. Then, using the scholarly database, get one source of literary criticism about the work, one source about the film, and one about the author. Write a short summary of the work of literature as well as one summary about each source, and then I will meet with you to help you focus on one particular aspect of the work, for example, one theme, one symbol, one character, or one particular use of symbolism.

Write a detailed outline for a “What You Need to Know When the Union Calls” manual.

Questions
1. List and briefly describe what you believe are the three most important steps Hotel Paris management can take now to reduce the likelihood unions will organize more of its employees.

2. Write a detailed outline for a “What You Need to Know When the Union Calls” manual. Lisa will distribute this manual to her company’s supervisors and managers, telling them what they need to know about looking out for possible unionizing activity, and how to handle actual organizing process-related supervisory tasks.

:Discuss the methodological weaknesses that were common to the overall body of literature you reviewed.

Literature Review:This is where you’ll review the current state of the literature concerning your research topic. You’re welcome to include more than the minimum of 6 articles and you can include as many reviews/meta-analyses as you want (but only one can count toward the 6 article total). Start this section with a general overview of the topic and why it’s important, then dive into critiques of individual articles. When discussing a particular article you should start with a description of the research question or aim of the study, then discuss the methodology (sample size, sample selection methods, methods of measuring each variable, confounds that were controlled for, etc.), and briefly summarize the findings. You will close with a discussion of the methodological strengths and weaknesses of the study. This last portion is worth paying special attention to. Be sure to consider as many topics from lecture as possible (e.g., confounds, external validity, internal validity, etc.). Each article summary/review should be a page to a page and a half. Proposed study:Discuss the methodological weaknesses that were common to the overall body of literature you reviewed. Which areas of knowledge or methodology need to be filled in? What questions should be asked to further our understanding of the topic? Both the hypothesis and methodology of your study should directly tie in to the articles you reviewed. Your hypothesis should be a natural extension of those article’s findings and your experiment’s design should address the overall methodological weaknesses you identified in the literature.

Based on your research and readings in the course text, how do you believe the religious content was described or presented?

If you choose the movie option, you will write a thoughtful essay, in which you respond to the following questions:
1. What was the source (library, YouTube, Google Play, Amazon, etc.) of your movie/film and where/when did you watch it?
2. What was the genre of the film (fiction, nonfiction, documentary, etc.)?
3. What religion is portrayed in the movie? (If there is more than one religion, identify them and explain how you identified each one). This is where you will have to document your narrative.
4. How is religion portrayed in the movie?
5. Based on your research and readings in the course text, how do you believe the religious content was described or presented?
6. What stereotypes are broken, which are reinforced?
7. What was your idea of the religion before and after watching the film?
8. What does this movie suggest about the nature of belief and practice?
9. Is there a better or worse format to present the stories and/or religions?
10. Where do you find you connect, relate and/or sympathize with the characters the movie and their experience(s)? Where do you depart from their experience?
11. Additional thoughtful reflections on the movie and its portrayal of the identified religion.
Your critical reflection paper should be written using (and citing from) at least five references from multiple sources, including pre-approved scholarly journals, books, and no more than three pre-approved websites specific to the religion the paper addresses. Sources should include authors from the religious tradition being researched. The paper must evidence higher thinking skills. The paper should be four to six (4-6) pages, not including the title page or bibliography.

Explain the traditional western view of the enduring self as well as one challenge to this view presented in Chapter 2. Which view do you find more compelling and why?

Your completed assignment must be submitted by 11:59 pm on Sunday, April 26. No work after that time will be accepted.

Explain the traditional western view of the enduring self as well as one challenge to this view presented in Chapter 2. Which view do you find more compelling and why?

Discuss in what ways was that decision effective?

Dynamics of diversity drive attention towards decisions and how they are negotiated. But there is a paradox to consider: While decision steps are central to your management authority, there is limited information within success stories and case studies about these details. This situation becomes problematic when there are a range of cultural expectations. In contrast, exploring how to making decisions by being attentive to diverse views adds power and analytical skill to your management performance.

You can observe important lessons about your decision/negotiating process by look at a memorable or “turning point” event in which you recall a decision and how it was negotiated, or not.

In what ways was that decision effective?
Was the decision negotiated? Why or why not?
Would that process work effectively if there were diverse viewpoints? (Course Content Modules 10 &11)