Write a letter to your legislator of choice, sharing your view of the topic and advocating for a specific action around the issue.

LETTER TO A LEGISLATOR – Solidify your understanding of what public health is and strengthen your public health communication skills by writing a letter to your legislator. SELECT ONE topic within the guidelines given above. RESEARCH and understand chosen topic, starting with materials presented in class and supplement with other resources available from authoritative sources and news outlets. APPLY core values and principals of ethical public health practice and the 3-step ethical analysis procedure to develop, summarize, and justify your stance on the issue. WRITE a letter to your legislator of choice, sharing your view of the topic and advocating for a specific action around the issue. CHECK for grammar issues, typos, and format: 1-2 type-written pages, double-spaced, 12pt Times New Roman, 1 inch margins. Important Notes Be thoughtful about topic selection. Among the public health related topics being debated today, what is important to you? Get clear on action opportunity. Has a decision been made around the topic that you do not agree with? Is legislative action pending on the topic? Strong letters address current issues with legislative implications. Focus your research. It may prove helpful to use course materials to begin to formulate your opinion of the topic and create a list of questions you think are important to learn more about and consider before you delve into further research. This approach can help with focus and efficiency. Hone and be clarify your message. What is the central message of your letter? What do you want your legislator to do about this issue? Is it simple? Clear? Actionable? All content used in your analysis and letter must be your own original content or/and be appropriately cited/referenced if from an outside source.

Use Tzinman’s essay,discussing what is the boundary/threshold between you and all-that-is-not-you?’

Closely read Tzinman’s essay, ‘Is Romeo Dead? On the Persistence of Organisms’. Use it to answer the following question: ‘What is the boundary/threshold between you and all-that-is-not-you?’ In order to do this, you must demonstrate a thorough understanding of Tzinman’s arguments. Do not take the question to be one of consciousness but of biology. What exactly is an organism for Tzinman and what are its boundaries, both physical and temporal? Remember and use the example we discussed in class of Arnold the lizard who eats Betty the cricket. How does that apply to you as an organism?

In an essay, give two detailed, specific examples of the use of symbolism in the film Whale Rider and describe how they are used to show Pai’s abilities to become a strong leader of her people.

In an essay, give two detailed, specific examples of the use of symbolism in the film Whale Rider and describe how they are used to show Pai’s abilities to become a strong leader of her people. Then discuss whether or not the people in this movie share equally in their culture. How does life change for them during the film, and how does this change affect their families and their community? Using an additional example from your community, the United States, or the world, discuss whether or not these people share equally in their culture. How does life change for them over time, and how does this change affect their families and their community?

Write an essay explaining factors that are normally considered aggravating and mitigating circumstances.

Write an essay explaining factors that are normally considered aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Step one: Select a death-row inmate from the Arizona Department of corrections website. Step two: Research your selected inmate and identify aggravating and mitigating circumstances that placed him/her on death row. Step three: Describe exactly why your case facts are mitigating and aggravating based on the explanation given in your assigned readings. Be sure to cite all of your sources. Evaluate why the factors of this case merited the sentence of death. Use the GCU Library to locate three to five relevant, scholarly sources in support of your content.

Identify A patient problem from the list provided or one of your choosing, then research evidence to determine or support your ideas as to why this is a prevalent patient problem.

Identify A patient problem from the list provided or one of your choosing, then research evidence to determine or support your ideas as to why this is a prevalent patient problem. Find evidence to support why it is a problem and how you think you would be able to solve it. There is a template provided in the attached files, this should be opened right away so that you could review exactly what you’re expected to do for this assignment, because the final product for this assignment is that completed template. Also Please read all the instructions carefully so that you know what needs to be done exactly for the assignment. 5 scholarly recourses are required. Scholarly reference is someone who is an expert in the field who has done research or has been peer reviewed, its been researched to be true and it is evidence based. so it is not something like a stat site or a .com site or something like that. Ideally you will be working with me for the next 4 assignments: The patient problem that you identify here will be used throughout the remainder of the assignments.Each assignment is designed to be a pice of that patient problem. Please see attached files for: Syllabus, instructions, the template you will be using, grading rubric, and recourses you may want to use if you need.

In a micro essay, explain how transcendental ideas and concepts are present in the film through Neil.

In a micro essay, explain how transcendental ideas and concepts are present in the film through Neil. Does Neil trust himself? Can he be defined as an individual? Would you call him a non-conformists? Address these questions in your response, using specific examples from the film. For example, does Neil allow his true feelings to prevail? How so? How does this relate to the ideas of Transcendentalism? Please focus only on Neil, but other characters may be mentioned. You will not be quoting from the movie but you will be expected to back your response with specific evidence. You must use two pieces of evidence followed by (commentary/analysis).