Interview an individual over 70 years of age to discuss his or her health history and describe how health care delivery has changed in his or her lifetime.

Interview an individual over 70 years of age to discuss his or her health history and describe how health care delivery has changed in his or her lifetime.Include the person’s age now, geographic location(s) over lifetime, types and sources of health care received and the estimated costs, how often health care was sought and how it was paid for, significant personal health conditions if the person is willing to share, types of preventive care received like immunizations, and finally the person’s perspectives about quality, cost and access then and now. Add anything else that you feel is relevant to this assignment.

What are some of the things an officer can do to put a witness at ease during the interview process?

write two page
1. What are some of the things an officer can do to put a witness at ease during the interview process? 2. Why is it important that an officer take the time to do these things?
3. How can an officer remain objective while helping a witness tell his or her story?

Assess the importance of technology in providing patients with clear and accessible information about health care organizations and the product(s) / service(s) that they provide.

1. Justify the purpose of the selected health care establishments’ product(s) / service (s) and their associated life cycle(s).
2. Suggest one (1) strategy to improve the marketing mix of the selected health care establishment. Support your strategy by highlighting one (1) benefit of (1) portfolio analysis and providing two (2) examples that display differential advantages.
3. Assess the importance of technology in providing patients with clear and accessible information about health care organizations and the product(s) / service(s) that they provide.
4. Outline a survey to capture patients’ expectations regarding the delivery and / or accessibility of product(s) / service(s) identified.

Which resource (hard copy or mobile app) would be a more effective tool for you in the workplace and why?

The Hazardous Materials Safety Administration published the Emergency Response Guidebook and has developed a free, mobile web app of the Emergency Response Guidebook (2016). Reflect on the information available in this guidebook or through the app and on the format in which it is presented. Which resource (hard copy or mobile app) would be a more effective tool for you in the workplace and why?

Consider the top three strengths (values) and how those would be challenged under the duress of the camp.

Overview
“What are my values?” is not always a question that we think consciously about, but assume we know intuitively – perhaps best recognized when we encounter something that goes against our sense of what is right or just. In this insight activity, you’ll be asked to complete a quiz that identifies a hierarchy of your values and from that, you’ll consider how these could be challenged under the duress of the camp. These are the questions we’ll grapple with for the following discussion.

You can make a list of your values. Provide at least three, or alternatively, you can sign up to take the free personality test survey on character strengths to find out your strengths (values).

Consider the top three strengths (values) and how those would be challenged under the duress of the camp. What does Levi (Primo Levi’s Survival in Auschwitz) describe that would challenge these and what is needed to be able to live in accordance with these values?

What are the steps you would take to convince a department not using evidence-based policing to use it?

Read Chapter 2 of the Bachman textbook, Chapter 2 of the Mosher textbook, and the website article “Evidence-Based Policing” before discussing the following prompts:
Describe the major elements of evidence-based policing.
How do the elements relate to research in criminal justice?
In what areas is evidence-based policing already being used?
What are the steps you would take to convince a department not using evidence-based policing to use it?