Explain two competing solutions to this problem while addressing the responsibilities of each level of government (federal, state, and local) and the three branches of the federal government (executive, legislative, and judicial).

Assignment InstructionsThis is part one of the class project assessments. See the attachment for more details of the overall project.An important purpose of this assignment is to examine what the different branches and layers of government do to address a policy using a current issue to illustrate it.Complete a research essay on the government and healthcare. Remember this is being written for the president to read. The U.S. healthcare system has been a controversial topic for decades. Here are the aspects and questions to address for this essay:Identify a current issue being debated about the American healthcare system and state a preferred solution to it and why it’s preferred (This is your thesis statement).Explain two competing solutions to this problem while addressing the responsibilities of each level of government (federal, state, and local) and the three branches of the federal government (executive, legislative, and judicial).Build the argument for why your chosen solution is preferable, what critics say about the solution, and finally why the critics are wrong.

Describe Canada’s Growth Towards Full Autonomy.

these are the instructions written by my socials teacher; Throughout this 1920s-30s unit we have examined various events that led Canada towards autonomy. These developments for Canada can be categorized into three classifications-Political developments, Economic developments and Social developments. The developments in each of these three areas did not individually give Canada independence, but they did give a little bit more autonomy over time in these areas which eventually led to full independence. It is important to remember this point as independence was earned, not given in one shot. Thus, you will now write an essay discussing just this very idea of autonomy gained over time, but giving one example per category to prove this. essay should contain the following: thesis paragraph, a paragraph for each point discussed and a concluding paragraph. Remember too that in your thesis paragraph, you are identifying what you will be talking about, not explaining in detail what you’ll be talking about. Three categories/types of Autonomy-Political, Social and Economic-it doesn’t matter what order you put these in but each must be identified and discussed. 4. Supporting Evidence-which will consist of one event per category that fits that category. Your discussion must not only include a brief history of the event but also and Most Important, a connection to why overall autonomy became closer for Canada because of the autonomy gained in each event. For example, if you discuss signing a treaty for the first time, explain how that one autonomous event helped Canada get closer to overall autonomy. 5. A topic sentence for each paragraph-

Who is this book primarily aimed at, the professional historian or a more general reading audience?

These are the kinds of aspects you should address:A brief overview of the book’s biographical figure and their major contribution/impact on early American history.Did the book offer a balanced account, or was it seemingly biased (either in favor or against)?Did the book use the kind of sources that demonstrate strong academic quality and reliability?Who is this book primarily aimed at, the professional historian or a more general reading audience?Did the book offer adequate general context for the biographical figure in question?What unexpected, unique, or otherwise interesting things did you learn from this book?

What are your next steps in speaking with your classmate?

Imagine the following scenario: You are taking the evidence-based practice course and one of your classmates shares an EBP project draft with you. You notice that some of the research has not been cited correctly or even at all. When you approach your classmate, the response is that “no one will notice and it is not a big deal anyway.” What are your next steps in speaking with your classmate? Consider how this could reflect on the credibility and integrity of the individuals involved, the University, and the profession.

What is the dilemma facing President Johnson?

Re-read all four of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution Documents A–D primary-source documents. Using at least three of these, answer the following questions:Citing and quoting from at least two documents, what did the North Vietnamese do in the Gulf of Tonkin, and why did the Johnson administration feel compelled to respond? What is the dilemma facing President Johnson?According to these documents, was the US planning to go to war in Vietnam before August 1964? Explain your answer, drawing on the documents provided.Min. 150 words, citing and quoting from the specified documents, and numbering your responses to correspond to the questions asked. Responses that do not meet this criteria will not be graded. You must use in-line citation, and can cite the documents simply as (Document A), (Document B), (Document C), etc.Written-Response Question Set 2 (Anti-Vietnam War Movement)Re-read the section “Vietnam: The Downward Spiral” from chapter 30.3 in OpenStax U.S. History. Also, view the Sound Smart: Vietnam War Protests short video from the History Channel website.Then read the Anti-Vietnam War Documents A–B, which include the following: Martin Luther King’s speech “Beyond Vietnam,” delivered April 4, 1967, at a meeting of Clergy and Laity Concerned at Riverside Church in New York City; and John Kerry’s testimony to the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, April 23, 1971. John Kerry was a veteran who returned from Vietnam in April 1969, having won early transfer out of the conflict because of his three Purple Hearts. He joined a group called Vietnam Veterans Against the War.Citing and quoting from MLK’s 1967 speech in Document A, why is King opposed to the Vietnam War? What examples does he give as to the public confusion, misinformation, and/or hypocrisy about the war effort? How and why does King connect the Civil Rights Movement with opposition to the Vietnam War?Citing and quoting from John Kerry’s 1972 speech in Document B, why are some veterans opposed to the Vietnam War? What examples does he give as to the public confusion, misinformation, and/or hypocrisy about the war effort? What indictment does Kerry make on the America’s political leadership?