Category: Essay Help

Begin by brainstorming on the following questions: What are the most important arguments that may be offered in support of the chosen view? What are the most important arguments that may be offered against that view? Which position would you defend? Why? What is the most important objection(s) to your position? How would you respond? Your essay should summarize the opposing arguments in the literature and present your own critical analysis of the evidence offered by the different sides. You should take a side in the debate and defend your position. The essay should start with an introduction, where you motivate the topic, briefly explain the debate, and present your argument. Including a roadmap will help the reader preview your analysis. Your essay should provide an overview of the literature on the topic, the main arguments that have been made, and the evidence that has been offered in support of those arguments. In your analysis, which should constitute the main portion of the essay, present your critical evaluation of the arguments and the evidence. The literature overview does not need to be comprehensive. Focus on the works that you think are most important. This means that before you start writing, you will need to critically read the literature to identify the works you will discuss.

Statistical inference is a concept that is not too difficult to understand when using cross-sectional data. For example, a population mean is not the same as a sample mean. There is uncertainty regarding the population mean given sample information and thus we have to rely on confidence intervals. But what about time-series? How can you make statistical inference about some population, given a sample at hand (using quarterly data from 1960-2020, for example) Describe the relationship between a sample and a population when using time series data.

Describe Epicureanism.

Begin by brainstorming on the following questions: What are the most important arguments that may be offered in support of the chosen view? What are the most important arguments that may be offered against that view? Which position would you defend? Why? What is the most important objection(s) to your position? How would you respond? Your essay should summarize the opposing arguments in the literature and present your own critical analysis of the evidence offered by the different sides. You should take a side in the debate and defend your position. The essay should start with an introduction, where you motivate the topic, briefly explain the debate, and present your argument. Including a roadmap will help the reader preview your analysis. Your essay should provide an overview of the literature on the topic, the main arguments that have been made, and the evidence that has been offered in support of those arguments. In your analysis, which should constitute the main portion of the essay, present your critical evaluation of the arguments and the evidence. The literature overview does not need to be comprehensive. Focus on the works that you think are most important. This means that before you start writing, you will need to critically read the literature to identify the works you will discuss.

Use all of your developing research skills to write an 8-10 page argument (2000-2500 words) that expresses your opinion on Should parents buy robot “companions” for their children? If so, under what circumstances and why? If not, why not?

Are you for or against the death penalty? Why?

Task 1: Report •Title Section – This includes the name of the author(s) and the date of report preparation.  •Summary – There needs to be a summary of the major points and conclusions. It needs to be short as it is a general overview of the report. •Introduction – The first page of the report needs to have an introduction.  You will explain the topic. •Body – This is the main section of the report.  There needs to be several sections, with each having a subtitle.  Information is usually arranged in order of importance with the most important information coming first.  •Conclusion – This is where everything comes together. •Referrences – put more and more citations in each part of report and each paragraph inside the report- Add pictures Task 2 : Make a presentation Structure your presentation Your oral presentations must have three main stages: ⎫The introduction: (what you intend to say) ⎫The body (the presentation itself) ⎫Conclusions (what you have said) Presentation guidelines Instructions for the preparation and delivery of your oral presentations •Presentation should be 10-15 minutes long •A minimum of 15 slides (maximum 20) should be included (excluding cover page and end slide) •As a rule of thumb, the number of slides in your presentation should be less than the presentation time allowed, eg, 10 slides for a 15 minute presentation allows you to speak for 1.5 minutes for each slide. •Use a standard font such as Times Roman, Arial, Verdana or Tahoma •Font size should be large enough to be legible (e.g. 22 – 28 for the text and 28-35 for titles) •Select the key points only for each of your PowerPoint slides. Keep the amount of information on each slide to a minimum.

Assignment: Essay Topic Prompt: In the article “Stage-Based Challenges and Strategies for Support in Doctoral Education: A Practical Guide for Students, Faculty Members, and Administrators,” Pifer and Baker (2016) identified three stages of doctoral education, explaining each one and suggesting strategies to overcome challenges that arise in each stage. The excerpted reading below includes the explanations and strategies aimed at doctoral students in the first two stages of doctoral education: knowledge consumption and knowledge creation. Read through these paragraphs from Pifer and Baker (2016), and then compose an essay in response to these questions: •Based on the challenges and strategies discussed by Pifer and Baker (2016), what challenges do you anticipate you will face in your doctoral program? •What strategies will you apply to work through these challenges in your doctoral journey? Article: http://ijds.org/Volume11/IJDSv11p015-034Pifer2155.pdf Question #1 Based on the challenges and strategies discussed by Pifer and Baker (2016), what challenges do you anticipate you will face in your doctoral program? Question #2 What strategies will you apply to work through these challenges in your doctoral journey? Reference Pifer, M. J. & Baker, V. L. (2016). Stage-based challenges and strategies for support in doctoral education: A practical guide for students, faculty members, and program administrators. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.28945/2347

Using the article https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/ap-norc-poll-pandemic-especially-tough-on-people-of-color/2020/05/06/ef295dcc-8fc3-11ea-9322-a29e75effc93_story.html write a term paper that includes the concept of structural racism (Golash-Boza p. 42) to think about interinstitutional interaction. For example, how inequality in employment can lead to inequality in access to health care. You could also use the concept of intersectionality (Golash-Boza pp. 53-54) to think about how multiple factors combine in a person’s life to create disadvantage. Since where people work and health are central to this paper. Key terms: Gini coefficient earnings gap wage gap underemployment human capital implicit bias deindustrialization skills mismatch hypothesis spatial mismatch hypothesis split labor market ethnic enclave economy racial enclave economy embedded market The article provided in the hyperlink must be central to the paper and included in both in-text citation and reference page.

This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process. Topic Selection Guidelines DIRECTIONS: You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay. B. Research Guidelines DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. 1. Research Question and Working Thesis Keep in mind: The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument. ❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question. ❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question. ❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis. 2. Detailed Outline Keep in mind: Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support. ❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s); at least 7 body paragraphs, an introduction, and a conclusion ❒ Introduction includes your working thesis. ❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points. ❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts. ❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea ❒ Sources: one to three for each subheading, as relevant, indicating the support for the key point ❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or information relevant to your argument (e.g. “Lappé on mono-cropping corn/soy and production”). 3. Reflection ❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities? ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses? ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? C. Reflection Questions DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. Learning to conduct research is important because it is a skill you will use both in academia and in your professional life. It improves critical thinking and empowers you to find information for yourself. Consider the process of researching as a whole. What was the most challenging aspect of the process for you? (2-3 sentences) The working thesis statement is a proposed answer to your research question. It should clearly identify a debatable topic and take a position on one side of that topic. Analyze the effectiveness of your working thesis statement. (3-4 sentences) A detailed outline is an effective tool for laying out the progression of an argument. It allows you to consider the arrangement and organization of your ideas, as well as choose places to incorporate outside source materials. Review your detailed outline and summarize the argument you’ve presented. (3-4 sentences) You will use the same topic on three of the remaining Touchstones in this course. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you? What are specific questions you might have as you go deeper into the research process? (2-3 sentences) D. Rubric Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%) Research Question Pose a meaningful research question on a debatable topic. Constructs a precise and focused research question relative to a current and debatable topic.Constructs a focused research question relative to a debatable topic.Constructs a research question relative to a debatable topic; however it is somewhat too broad or too narrow for the assignment.Constructs a research question; however, the question is too broad or too narrow for the assignment and/or it is not debatable.Does not construct a research question, or constructs a research question that does not meet any of the rubric criteria. Working Thesis Propose a focused working thesis. Includes a working thesis that takes a well-articulated, clear, specific position on one side of an issue.Includes a working thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of an issue.Includes a working thesis that takes a clear position on one side of an issue; however it lacks specificity.Includes a working thesis; however, it lacks specificity and does not take a clear position.Does not include a working thesis, or includes a thesis that does not take a position. Detailed Outline Present a detailed outline that includes coherent headings, subheadings, and source placement notes. Outline is thoroughly developed and clearly labeled with effective notes, such that the reader can easily see how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present.Outline is well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; all necessary elements of the outline are present.Outline is primarily well-developed and labeled with sufficient notes, such that the reader can get an overall sense of how the essay will build its argument; however, a few necessary elements may be unclear or missing.Outline is not fully developed and/or labeling and notes are often unclear, such that the reader cannot easily get a sense of how the essay will build its argument; several necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing.Outline is not developed and/or labeling and notes are unclear or absent, such that the reader is unable to see how the essay will build its argument; most necessary elements of the outline are unclear or missing. Style Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices. Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Conventions Follow conventions for standard written English. There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage. Reflection Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully. Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present. E. Requirements The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded: Double-space the outline and use one-inch margins. Use a readable 12-point font. All writing must be appropriate for an academic context. Composition must be original and written for this assignment. Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited. Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition. Submission must include your research question, working thesis, outline, and reflection questions. Include all of the assignment components in a single file. Acceptable file formats include .doc, .docx, and .pdf. F. Additional Resources The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment: Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style Guide This site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types. Frequently Asked Questions About APA Style This page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course. APA Style: Quick Answers—References This page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.