Analyze Argumentation Techniques.
Do the following:Use Outline Format (easier for students to read & instructor to grade – or you will not earn points)”Summarize” 5 Key Points featured in posterIdentify & List 5 Key Points featured in poster.Do not copy and paste student poster material for this list or you will not receive points!Please use your own words and ideas which requires you to actually interpret & synthesize pertinent content.Be specific – you need to prove that you’ve actually read and have learned specific details, about the topic, or you will not earn pointsCritique Assignment: Identify what was done well, areas in need of improvement, and specific suggestions for improvement. A total of 5 items for maximum points. (Review Rubrics For Ideas)Offer additional material (5 items total) related to topic (you must research topic to find additional websites, compositions, content, terms, visuals that could be added to student’s poster…this will assist you with also learning about the topic ). Note: You must perform research in order to complete this portion of the “peer review/critique” & cite your sources by including activated url addresses or you will not earn points!Review Directions & Rubrics prior to submissions!
We started this course by considering that everyone is a theologian because everyone has thoughts about God. You considered how you form your thoughts of who God is and what God does. In Module/Week 1, you reflected on your experience with theology and your study of theology in the past. For this module/week, you will write a 600-word essay answering the following 3 prompts that will allow you to reflect on how you’ve grown in your understanding and study of theology.1.How has your view of theology changed over the duration of this course? (approximately 200 words)2.How have you been able to practice the principles you learned from the course in your own life? (approximately 200 words)3.How will you pass on the information you have learned in this course to those within your circle of influence? (approximately 200 words)Refer to the “Course Policies” in the course syllabus for the formatting expectations in this course.previous experience with theology;Name: Abdullah Hassan 1.When you hear the word theology, what comes to you mind?Each time I stumble upon the word Theology, I frequently consider “faith” and “God”. However, the word itself is a solitary element which makes theology altogether considered as mysticism. Some may contend and argue for an explanation that religious philosophy is the foundation of all religion. Etymologically, Theology is derived from the Greek words Theos which implies “god” and logos which means “study”, “reason”, or “work”; therefore, philosophy is a science that studies the life and work of God. As an adherent Cristian, it is my duty to reinforce my confidence to God, to strengthen my faith. For this reason, utilizing Theology as an instrument to extend my comprehension to his works, life and reason may bring productive and consistent experience. God’s presence is within us. It is unseen yet felt as the inquisitive brain addresses what is beyond the physical aspect of life, considering our spirituality and meanings. Theology is not restricted uniquely to the crafts of god; it additionally thinks about our faith. Faith can be characterized differently. However, technically speaking, we as a whole have a comparable setting. For instance, when we believe that tomorrow will be better, we wish that by the day’s end, we will be satisfied regardless of what the conditions are, having said that “believing” and “wishing” are the equivalent of having faith to the work of God—believing in him, and giving up our grievances, problems to his capable hands.2.What experience have you had in your past with the study of theology?My experience contemplating theology in past is awful and not as productive as it is presently. I believe in the platitude, “maturity accompanies age”. Indeed, as a student with a youthful brain, with a youthful point of view, I frequently depend on the ramifications of my faculties, my senses, what I feel, what I think, what I see and what I touch. Every one of my contemplations rotates around these faculties. Imagine a twelve-to-fourteen-year-old student taking up theology, learning about non-existential entities, learning about meanings and purpose of life as well as words encrypted in the Bible with no sort of background and experience. He has to learn something about a man making marvels with no significant clarifications. In this contemplation, I used to find myself interrogating myself: Will the student be enlightened? Will it make sense? Will it bode well? Will the course serve and pass what it is expected to? The appropriate response is yes and no. Perhaps, for some with related knowledge, extraordinary foundations and with learning with some mastery on the field, it is guaranteed. However, for somebody who really has experienced the realities of life at an early stage, seeking endlessly the cause and effect with a constrained source to shape total and concrete concluding thoughts, it will be unlikely. Theology will sound baseless, totally taken as a myth. To the extent I can recollect that, I am on the last mentioned.3.Besides a passing grade, what do you hope to take away from this course over the next 8 modules/weeks?Besides passing the course, I would like to extend my insight and comprehension of the Divine Being’s words and crafts. Having so may help me boost my confidence in proclaiming the Almighty’s nobility.
Describe substainabilie in the food chain.If you make a statement, it is often helpful to push yourself to think deeper and elaborate your thinking by asking yourself “why?” or “how?” Providing this support for claims is crucial to critical thinking and writing. As you think about the future of our food system, what bothers you the most and whyplease use this as a reference.Watch “A Farm for the Future” -https://vimeo.com/136857929 and Website: https://fightfor15.org
play the part of sociologists and explain why we have the problem of toxic wastes and environmental injustice. One way in which sociologists make visible and interpret our daily lives and experiences is through theories. A good theory should help us to make sense of our lives in a new way, it helps us to interpret seemingly unrelated facts, sometimes it might even help us to predict what will happen. Barry Commoner offered one theory or perspective about the environment. He said that the economy created environmental problems because it was more focused on profit than the environment. Political sociologists offer another. They offer different explanations about who has power in this country. Sociologists don’t always agree, hence we have different interpretations of the same facts. So for example, where Commoner focuses on the economy, other sociologists focus on the relationship between the economy, politics, and citizens.As we discussed in class, Pluralist theorists ( who believe in structural functional perspectives) argue that government is successful in resolving social problems because government acts as a kind of balancer. They believe that we are a stable society where all groups are treated equally and no one group has too much influence. Elite and Critical theorists wish that pluralists were right and hope that someday what they say will be true. They believe, however, that for today pluralists fail to examine the power inequities among different groups— that certain groups have more influence over government than others, such as industry’s need for profit and health. In addition critical theorists disagree with elite theorists on one point: elite theorists believe that citizens have no power—that there is no democracy in the US, only the pretense of democracy. Critical theorists believe, in contrast, that that we end up with a partial democracy; citizens have some power through voting, boycotts and protest, but the structure of political and economic power ends up excluding most citizens, who have to fight for what they want. Unequal treatment in a democracy leads to conflict and not stability, they argue, because most people in the U.S. believe in the values of democracy and justice and do not like to see these values violated. 1) Play the part of different sociologists and explain the views of pluralist, elite and critical sociologists 2)) Choose the theory which you feel best explains the structure of power in our country– the relationship between citizens, government and industry. Which one best explains what happened at Love Canal? at Chester PA? 3)Use illustrations from the video and readings on Love Canal, and the film on Shintec in Cancer Alley in Louisiana, and the article on Environmental Racism.to support the theory you chose. You do not need to summarize the article or video or film, but rather write about specific examples which illustrate the theory you selected. (see final review sheet for illustrations) 4) What are your personal thoughts about what we have been reading? 5) What did you like best about this class? What would you change? Which articles and videos did you like best in this class? Which did you like least?How did you find taking this class online?
The interpretation of research in health care is essential to decision making. By understanding research, health care providers can identify risk factors, trends, outcomes for treatment, health care costs and best practices. To be effective in evaluating and interpreting research, the reader must first understand how to interpret the findings. You will practice article analysis in Topics 2, 3, and 5.For this assignment:Search the GCU Library and find three different health care articles that use quantitative research. Do not use articles that appear in the Topic Materials or textbook. Complete an article analysis for each using the “Article Analysis 1” template.Refer to the “Patient Preference and Satisfaction in Hospital-at-Home and Usual Hospital Care for COPD Exacerbations: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial,” in conjunction with the “Article Analysis Example 1,” for an example of an article analysis.